Leaderboard

Почему ты тогда ведешь спор если не владеешь информацией?

От меня - нельзя.

Плохо что ты не заметил конструктива. У реальной 120 расстояние срабатывания взрывателя 8 метров. ЕД сделали 15. Мы задаем вопрос зачем это было сделано нам не отвечают. Не конструктивно, но как бы с другой стороны.

Да-но ракеты летают 99%и 9 процетнов вероятности...И против этих ракет нету манёвров уклонения ? Докажите обратное...

ok, before i get flamed for not using search, im making this thread, because when i do search, all i keep getting is a list of possible next DCS modules, NOT actually being developed module.. SO MY QUESTION IS.. WHAT IS MOST LIKELY THE NEXT DCS MODULE that is in development, which will be slated after A-10C? before the Ka-50 release, it was stated that the AH64A was after the Ka50, which later changed to the A-10A, to the A-10C. i have seen AH-64A cockpit models, and they have mention AH64A was more or less unclassified? i mean what aircraft is there that info is available for a high fidelity sim, and again, i am just wondering what is the next module being develop in which DCS has info, etc to make the next module possible.. i have the feeling im going to get the inevitable, "when they announce, that is what it will be". would be great if it was AH-64A wich dual pilot copilot gunner operation F-16.. classified or not? on top of F-18, F15, etc.. so lets be real..

*UPDATED TO V1.7!* Another mod put together for your enjoyment, this time i've hunted around and pieced together a single .cdds skinpack for a bunch of some of the ugliest looking stock model jets/objects in lockon :D ******IMPORTANT! : PLEASE UNINSTALL PREVIOUS VERSIONS IF YOU'RE UPDATING TO A NEWER VERSION, OR SOME TEXTURES MAY NOT SHOW!******* Some details: 2048x2048 resolution C-17A Skin by iViper MiG-31 "Tambovskiy Wolf" 2048x2048 resolution 1024x1024 resolution detailed R-27 missile skins 10x F-14 Tomcat skins in 2048x2048 by Alexandra E-2 Hawkeye 2048x2048 resolution skin 2048x2048 resolution KC-10 Skin by Flanker 6x Mirage2000 skins in 2048x2048 resolution 3x Su-17 Skins in 2048x2048 resolution by Flanker Tu-95MS and Tu-142 skins in 2048x512 by kyborg Admiral Kuznetsov repaint by 159th_Blackhawk 2048x2048 resolution Tu-160 skin Engels AB Ticonderoga and Oliver Perry repaints F-16CG-CJ War Pack Textures by D-Scythe 2048x2048 resolution C-130 skins by Alexandra High resolotion An-26 Aeroflot skin High resolution detailed civilian vehicles skins High resolution camo skin for ATZ-60 fuel tanker Luftwaffe and TuAF F-4E Skins IAF F-16C 2048x2048 resolution Skin TuAF F-16C 2048x2048 resolution skin by 141st_c@sper Tu-22M3 Cockpit glass fix and improved skin by Jetfire Removed S-3B "Shamrocks" skin from previous versions and replaced with different skin Included improved Luftwaffe numbers and badge markings USS Carl Vinson "Dirty Decks" textures by iVIPER21 (appologies if i've missed any artists out!) VERSION 1.7 AVAILABLE HERE (MODMAN compatible) http://files.lockon.ru/en/111/

In anticipation of DCS:A-10C, I started creating a checklist. I don't have any A-10C docs (yet!) so I started with the A-10A, but thought I'd share. A10A_startup_rev001.pdf

Weathered MiG-29A/G/S skins for FC2.0, created by 3Sqn_ruggbutt, repackaged in a single .cdds format file by myself :) Download here (MODMAN compatible) http://www.mediafire.com/?zykwwzdimyj

Many of you know me from various Lock On Videos. Well, I have been working on something in Arma II for quite a while, and I wanted to share it with you all. Might be a nice break to keep your feet on the ground for a few minutes! :) I hope I am not breaking any rules by posting a non-Lock On movie (there are planes in it, lol), if so, moderators please close the thread down, but if not, then here it is: xklP-yNuU84

Tacview 0.95a Here a new release which should fix most of your issues: You can now choose where to record your flights! The bug which prevented from loading Tacview 0.95 compressed files has been fixed Several minor fixes Enjoy! http://tacview.strasoftware.com Flights are now recorded by default into [\My Documents\Tacview\]

For Video go here: Take the very first one that is 72.6 mb http://game.amd.com/us-en/drivers_catalyst.aspx?p=win7/windows-7-64bit

@Mustang I just want to thank you for spending your time to create a better looking FC2.0 with that kind of skinpacks! Appreciate your determination and hard work! rhino

У меня опера ,был предыдущий поставил 10.1 недавно ,только что зашел на ютюб все нормально Единственное что старый плагин стерся а нового найти не могу в папках, но работает.

В Файрфоксе была такая-же беда. Там через админку надо было удалять данные о старом плеере и только тогда устанавливать новые версии.

скачивай экзешники по ссылкам http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/thankyou/?installer=Flash_Player_10.1_for_Windows_-_Other_Browsers http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/thankyou/?installer=Flash_Player_10.1_for_Windows_Internet_Explorer закрывай все окна всех браузеров, запускай оба экзешника по очереди устанавливай. перезагружаться необязательно.

Иван владеет информацией,но у него NDA .Олег ,я не вижу проблемы спора вообще.Ответы давали на все вопросы ,но ты их либо не принимаешь ,либо еще что то.Дали ясный и четкий ответ - на данный момент до появления у ракет АФМ изменений не будет.И никаких патчей до выхода А-10С не планируется.Не нужно создавать темы и голосовалки ,пока не пришло время.

Not only that. Keep in mind that FSX is the most power hungry sim today. You need a top-notch rig (even in todays standards), to be able to run it at full settings. Not to mention that main part of FSX is graphics. It doesn't have sophisticated flight model, it doesn't have sophisticated avionics. It has no real AI. It has no ballistic simulation...

Su-27KUB http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7434912035542823676#docid=3028895372107453312

Тебе не кажется, что между январем 2009 и выходом ГС мал-мал времени прошло?

That's how it's supposed to be, as of v1.02. From now on, you'll get Russian language audio if you're fighting for a Red coalition (which will be most of the time in singleplayer), and English audio for a Blue coalition. If you want to have English audio even when you're flying for Russia, there are mods out there that change it back to the way it was before the patch. There's a thread on this forum that discusses all of this, shouldn't be too hard to find by using the search function. Edit: not the thread I was thinking of, but it addresses your issue. http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=54725

Рекомендую больше заботиться об уместности своей персоны, нежели о других. Плюшки добавлены.

Ok, I've been working on the VSD for the past couple nights, a few hours at a time. This is what I have so far: You likes? I figured out a new technique for the twist knobs. Almost makes me want to go back and fix all the other knobs I've done. Aero

Вот пара треков от Yoda для версии ГС 1.12 Поскольку оригинальный трек был утерян, Yoda по моей просьбе вчера записал пару новых треков. Но суть от этого не меняется. Там показан уход от нескольких десятков ракет. Barell Roll FC 1.12.zip

Just to let you guys know, I bought a GTX480 BTW

О том, что тонкий троллинг иногда не в кассу и Ваша личность неуместна в этом топике. Плюшек добавить? :)

Это о чем?

It doesn't light up terrain at higher altitudes. You can be 1m over the terrain in the mountains and you'll see nothing. It will however light up other objects at all levels. Nate

При чем тут фонари? А солнышко - оно у всех одинаково.

Ну а уж если учеть, что днем на больших высотах засветка от солнца и от облаков такая, что ИЛС банально не видно, то уметь пользоваться будильниками очень даже необходимо :) МФИ, кстати говоря, от солнышка тоже страдают :)

I am not sure, but I think I may have found a fix. goto Scripts\Aircrafts\Ka-50\Cockpit\mainpanel_init.lua then change -- Fuel tanks ForwardTankAmount = CreateGauge() ForwardTankAmount.arg_number = 137 ForwardTankAmount.input = {0.0, 1.0} ForwardTankAmount.output = {0.0, 1.0} ForwardTankAmount.controller = controllers.ForwardTankAmount RearTankAmount = CreateGauge() RearTankAmount.arg_number = 138 RearTankAmount.input = {0.0, 1.0} RearTankAmount.output = {0.0, 1.0} RearTankAmount.controller = controllers.RearTankAmount lamp_ForwardTankTest = CreateGauge() lamp_ForwardTankTest.arg_number = 139 lamp_ForwardTankTest.input = {0.0, 1.0} lamp_ForwardTankTest.output = {0.0, 1.0} lamp_ForwardTankTest.controller = controllers.lamp_ForwardTankTest lamp_RearTankTest = CreateGauge() lamp_RearTankTest.arg_number = 140 lamp_RearTankTest.input = {0.0, 1.0} lamp_RearTankTest.output = {0.0, 1.0} lamp_RearTankTest.controller = controllers.lamp_RearTankTest to -- Fuel tanks RearTankAmount = CreateGauge() RearTankAmount.arg_number = 137 RearTankAmount.input = {0.0, 1.0} RearTankAmount.output = {0.0, 1.0} RearTankAmount.controller = controllers.RearTankAmount ForwardTankAmount = CreateGauge() ForwardTankAmount.arg_number = 138 ForwardTankAmount.input = {0.0, 1.0} ForwardTankAmount.output = {0.0, 1.0} ForwardTankAmount.controller = controllers.ForwardTankAmount lamp_ForwardTankTest = CreateGauge() lamp_ForwardTankTest.arg_number = 139 lamp_ForwardTankTest.input = {0.0, 1.0} lamp_ForwardTankTest.output = {0.0, 1.0} lamp_ForwardTankTest.controller = controllers.lamp_ForwardTankTest lamp_RearTankTest = CreateGauge() lamp_RearTankTest.arg_number = 140 lamp_RearTankTest.input = {0.0, 1.0} lamp_RearTankTest.output = {0.0, 1.0} lamp_RearTankTest.controller = controllers.lamp_RearTankTest All works perfect, its been used for a while now by various people and there are 0 problems associated with it, basically just switch the red numbers about so that the forward tank is numbered 138 and the rear tank is numbered 137 and the tanks/guages will be correct ingame. I hope this helps, also its my first ever fix for any of the lockons/dcs sims, so I did get a raging boner when I found a solution :joystick: Just to add, I did more than just swapping the numbers about, I also swapped the paragraphs about so that the rear tank/137 is now above the forward tank/ 138 instead of being below it, purely because of the positioning of the numbers, I simply wanted 137 to be above 138 :music_whistling: have Phun.

Пускают их чаще в ППС, но в ЛО ракета часто взрывается сбоку/сверху/снизу от цели, и у ракеты основная мощь взрыва уйдёт вперёд, туда, где цели нет. Только в ЛО у АИМ-120 взрыватель не направленный, а уберный всеракурсный. P.S. Кстати, разницы между ППС и ЗПС цели для такого взрывателя нет, при направленном вперёд взрыве надо чтобы вражеский самолёт перед взрывом был непосредственно перед носом ракеты. Что в ЛО не так уж часто бывает:music_whistling: Вот пару скриншотов для примера - нос ракеты не повёрнут прямо на самолёт, поэтому эффективность реального взрывателя в данной ситуации под вопросом:music_whistling: Но в ЛО у нас большой всенаправленный взрыв:(

I'm sure everyone has seen some of the following by now: Game Nexus - E3 2010: Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog SimHQ at E3Expo 2010 - Hands-on: Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog Controller Additionally, here's a post by Teej, one of the Virtual Thunderbird pilots on site in LA at the preview event of the HOTAS Warthog, commenting on several of the asked about features/concerns (from the SimHQ forums): http://simhq.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/3032644/Re_Thrustmaster_HOTAS_Warthog_.html#Post3032644

Вопрос. Можно ли в онлайне (на рафе например) пускать ракеты без ПР? Точно не знаю, а хотелось бы использовать.

AFAIK only 2 people voiced an opinion on why they didn't want HL and Viper was responding to your posts about their opinions saying they have the right to voice them and they don't have to concur with your opinions. I will be quite frank, Your attitude towards other's who don't share your opinions tends to be downright hostile. You may just want HL back and in the community which is fine but alot depends on the way you go about doing such. You also tend to misconstrue opinions against an idea as opinions against yourself. I would suggest taking a deep breath and rereading some of the posts to get a better idea about where the "COMMUNITY" stands on this subject.

"I would choose rather watching Bold and beautiful with Brooke and Ridge drama lol" This was not nessesary. I know your just trying to funny, but it wasn't to me. ""I was feeling nostalgic calmness and fanciful boredom when my eyelids accidentially dropped down"?" Again, not nessesary. Your trying too hard to be funny. That is the ONLY reason why you wrote that. What's wrong with saying "It's making me sleepy?" " - unnecessary slow down video - almost no action due to slow down - especially with Mi-24 and Vikhr - music is even nice - movie FPS is low - you moved camera manually in few times " This is much better. You see you can say the things you want without acting like a 6 year old.

I don't know how to say in another way that I felt sleepy? Maybe "I was feeling nostalgic calmness and fanciful boredom when my eyelids accidentially dropped down"? I said what I felt and I am not gonna change facts that are for me: - unnecessary slow down video - almost no action due to slow down - especially with Mi-24 and Vikhr - music is even nice - movie FPS is low - you moved camera manually in few times Overall I would go watch one of the next "exciting" mile-long episode of serie.

Atskiy_KOT, =RAF=KOT, английский ни в зуб ногой, МИГ-С, фека, сушко, миг-а