Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Nipil

  • Birthday 01/22/2000

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS, Il-2 BzS
  • Location
  • Interests
    Wasting my time here

Recent Profile Visitors

1982 profile views
  1. Простите, неправильно понял новость. Я подумал, что под голосовыми командами подразумевается управление игроком при помощи голоса, вопрос был о такого рода функционале.
  2. В связи с новостью о голосовых командах для Петровича и Джорджа вопрос - не планируется ли такая же функция для ведомых в звене и в целом для радиопереговоров?
  3. Су-34, Су-30 (хотя он и является лишь реликтом времен flanker'а) как минимум.
  4. Nipil


    MiG-23 itself will take some more years to complete, given how low it's on Razbam priority list. And by the time it's done, Raz is going to have it's hands full with half a dozen other projects, just ad always. So I would not expect a MiG-27 from Razbam in next 5 years or so. Still, we might (but it's still to be confirmed) get an Su-17/22 from other dev in the coming years, so it's not all bad news.
  5. 2022 and beyond video at 3:09. Nakajima Ki-43? UPD: No, it's a FW-190 with IJA livery, see a comment below by @Silver_Dragon.
  6. We need destructible trees, that's for sure. Yet I believe it's going to drastically lower performance if we had a full-blown damage model for every tree on the map. So simply destroying trees should be enough.
  7. Now imagine how technically difficult it would be to make a proper FPS out of DCS. And how poor will performance be. The engine of DCS is just not suited for this. There is a reason why there isn't a simulator of everything on the market. It's technically impossible to create one, even for giants like EA, Ubisoft and others who have billions of dollars at their disposal.
  8. Adequate AI. Without it singleplayer is pure pain.
  9. FC-3 is unlikely to recieve any new functionality, it's already written off I guess since it's old, low fidelity, and it's going to be replaced by upcoming MAC anyways. Our best hope is that ED does make future full fidelity MiG-29 right, but its release is years away from now and it's not even officially confirmed.
  10. Su-34 has been in DCS for a very long time, might be a mistake from more than 10 years ago the devs didn't bother to correct because it doesn't really affect anything.
  11. It's a really important question for me. Right now I am using it in free trial, and while external model is good and the plane itself is quite interesting and is simply iconic, the cockpit spoils the overall impression significantly. Especially the lower part of it. And the switch logic, as mentioned above, is really counterintuitive after playing all other modules.
  12. Когда планируются светящиеся палочки для ночных операций палубной команды Supercarrier'а? Печально, что об этом уже много месяцев не говорится ни слова, хотя это самая важная с практической точки зрения фича, которая еще не реализована в этом модуле.
  13. AFAIK, there is not enough data available publicly to make a full fidelity Su-34. And Russian government is highly secretive about aircraft currently in service, even those less advanced than the Fullback. At least, that's what have been answered many times to similar wishes by the devs.
  14. We don't even have proper ATC or cloud's impact on AI in an aviation sim, yet you already want resources to be directed to what basically is something completely different than a flying sim. DCS should not try to be everything at the same time, ED simply doesn't have enough resources to deliver even what they've already pledged in time they'd announced. Also, DCS as it is now is not really suited for infantry gameplay in general. This is not to say the idea itself is bad, what I mean is it would steal resources from other things which would be much more beneficial for what is first and foremost a flight sim.
  15. Before new clouds were released it was totally playable. Weather was Case III but visibility was ok for CCIP delivery.
  • Create New...