Expert

Just :doh:

Why do females have problems with male voices while I have no problem playing with female ones? It's such a ridiculous thing to be angry just for the voice. I've always hated people when they try to make a passion subject to sexuality.

Honestly, having all female voices also doesn't change much, and I'm male, but I start to see problems when I see requests like the female driver's body with even hair! I think these requests are sexist, that they have nothing to do with a flying enthusiast but have more to do with a kind of narcissistic procurement or just a boorish feminism. If it were up to me this topic should be re-evaluated in its expressiveness. It's amazing to think how many things this sim has to complete and what do you do? do you start arguing about the pilot's body?

Alto mare? :megalol: leggi la parte sul viper https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4300736#post4300736

I can't quote the wags comment but i leave the link https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4300736#post4300736 This said also applies to razbam. Frankly I am shocked. Now enough, I leave this sim for good. What is happening is scandalous. Have you read the part about the F-16? It's a life that I say it!! Don't make multiple modules at the same time! we don't want them! we don't buy them! I would like to ask Wags, can we have an exact and scientific definition of what a complete and finished module is?

OK but balkans has the aircraft carrier :clap_2:

Glad to know that there are users who understand things as they are :thumbup: The community needs our feedback to improve. I'm tired of these useless comments that distract, it almost seems that you feel obliged to defend the defects of the sim, but isn't it that someone pays you to do it? it is so boring to read these answers. Where do I start to explain why it would be useless to answer you? I think i expressed myself well; compared to current graphics. I see that in the end you understand that it is a question of money. I don't care who they need to get help from to get a decent optimization in non-biblical times, i'm interested in knowing if they can get it quickly in exchange for a fee. Instead of spending money on new modules with no guarantees that come out of EAs after years, spend it to have a decently updated platform rather. Omg, why are you comparing it to 1080ti? do not mix pears with apples.

+1. We already know that the new cards have an average of 25/30%(if we're lucky) more performance without dlss/rtx, with dlss they can reach double compared to the same range 2080-3080/2080TI-3090 So stop saying it does "twice" the performance because it's not true. As dg6546 says, if ED doesn't do a professional job in the code forget about improvements. The sim has a painful optimization, embarrassing for the current level of graphics. Stop buying modules and ask to pay for a new core in DCS 3.0. I know it's unfair, it would be an incorrect policy change but I'm tired of having to wait so long for an updated platform. I'm getting bored of having a thousand thousand modules and not an ecosystem to be able to fully exploit them. ED must realize that VR is the future.

Hi. Yes i mean the poll. Are you referring to the icons above the submit new ..? if yes then what icon it is becouse i want open the poll in the Chit-Chat section. EDIT: problem solved, thx anyway

Why not Balkan?

The real question is: is the online really useful?

Just why?

Interesting. Wags was referring to the polar charts. I believe that in the end it's a complaint not much on what the hornet can do aerodynamically but on how it can perform from the point of view of the maneuvering computer. If it were to be only from the aerodynamic perspective it would not make sense because as I said before it's possible to use reverse engineering, so i don't think so, but if this were to be the case ED should specify it in big letters. This is because a 1:1 reproduction is feasible if allowed, contrary to what "someone" here on the forum said, so it would be necessary to specify when it is known at least for when regarding the fm, what is 1:1 and what no, as FM is often advertised as a 1:1 copy of cards.... I'm talking about the FM. It's obvious that weapons, avionics, ecm etc ... cannot be disclosed if classified. It's not so obvious for the FM. As far as I am concerned the important thing is that it's credible from the arodynamic and physical point of view, for what concerns the FLCS is another matter, but,i repeat, if the censorship were to be relevant to the point that the things doesn't match even using formulas, charts, CFDs and other stuffs, then it is not good and they have to specify it otherwise they are peddling a 1:1 FM equal to the cards when it is not. However, I am waiting for an official response from the TrueGrit as some users on the forum say that the sensations of the pilots and not the cards are important, in spite of the "realistic flight simulation"

No, it isn't (at least for older aircraft, f16/18 for example). it is common sense to think instead that it is useless to create an "inaccurate" FM to avoid revealing the real performances because the latter do not interest the common citizen but the adversary countries, countries that have the means to do reverse engineering and know the performances , in addition to the fact that there is espionage. So no your speech does not make sense. and should i even answer you?

IDS all the life!

Do you have written evidence from ED of what you claim? Nope. I just expect them to tell me officially. It's one thing is to have the cards not classified as many modules in DCS (I know this, then if you have proofs to the contrary, please tell us), is one thing to use the CFD simulation in the absence of documentation, another thing is to invent random data to avoid declassifying the actual performance purposely creating an inaccurate flight model. And from what has been said here i believe this is the last one i said. So I expect a legitimate response from TrueGrit because i don't think it's a foregone conclusion.

Wait a sec, let me understand. The data are classified and that is why it clearly cannot be distributed to the public, but in the end it will be legally possible to create the exact FM of the Eurofighter in the sim or will it be modified to protect classified data? If this is the case, this module should no longer be considered as a study level sim, and consequently, in addition to reporting the fact, a lower price should be applied.

I need help. I can't figure out how to create a post with voting, do you know how?

:thumbup: Hai colto i problemi delle EA. Smettete di comprare accessi anticipati a meno che non ci sia la garanzia del rimborso se entro tot tempo non finiscono il modulo.

Any other images?

Any update?

Ma vedi è questo il punto. I "tempi di sviluppo" non devono per forza gravare su chi copra. Loro vendono un modulo in accesso anticipato ovvero incompleto che migliora piano piano ma i miei soldi se li beccano subito, quelli non li vogliono in accesso anticipato. Perché invece non fanno un abbonamento per le EA a 3 euro al mese? in due anni sperando che completino il modulo, avremmo pagato 72 euro, non mi sembra male come idea, mi sembra più equo. Tu mi dai un prodotto che si completa piano piano e io ti pago piano piano. Per quanto riguarda il core sim. Tutte le missioni, il gioco online, le campagne, non costituiscono la vera essenza del sim. Abbiamo bisogno di un ecosistema realistico e non di una missioncina cinematografica scriptata. Quel sistema si chiama campagna dinamica, e senza un core sim sviluppato appositamente avremo sempre problemi e bug. Il livello di ottimizzazione di questo sim è scandaloso e con l'overhead che c'è su pc ci vorranno 10-15 anni per fare qualcosa di decente in vr con la grafica attuale.

Cerchiamo di salvarci il portafogli la prossima volta non comprate moduli tipo l'F-16 se prima non finiscono ciò che hanno da fare( F18 )

A lot of people still don't understand or refuse to understand it, they only like "buy to support" I suggest ED to hire this guy up to manage who and how certain modules are to be done. Edit: for real, the harrier is the only v/stol module we have, it's iconic, is not tolerable that it's done badly in every aspect, including the graphic one.

Only razbam?