Brainfreeze

Tried to call tanker in SP and MP using AUX and we were getting no response. Switched freq to PRI and called again...tanker responds

Don't have that no. There was a difference some time ago where lighting between the foveated area and the rest was noticeably different but it has largely been ironed out on subsequent releases. Can still see differences is some conditions but not something as extreme as what you describe.... i.e ON /OFF

Re the conquest vr headphone...Just checked their website and seems only in white there and not sure tehy ship to Europe yet... where did u get urs from?

You set that in VB. It is the V-sync option setting. Same place you select motion smoothing (which I use contrary to Dburne)

Did you perform a repair? that is the first thing to do

Found an instance where CDIP seems to correlate with the TGT point elevation instead of ground under the piper. Track file attached. tgt point entered as 6. with elevation of 1500ft instead of 4500ft ground lvl. Low drag delivery .. upon pickle computer goes to AUTO but does not drop bomb ... I went around with pickle pressed and as soon as a solution for bombing the 6. tgt point was found bombs dropped. server-20231007-145814.trk

If things were logical then in DCS u should have headphones and voice directed to your headset, not your realtek (pc speaker)

Bar the bombing range mission (which has its own flaw given the use of a non yet available GBU28 ) I am getting no voice from from WSO communications...just a radio click and then text... Is that normal or just me?

In VIS mode you cannot create a markpoint with HMCS first and then refine it with TGP. The TGP will slew to the markpoint if you select it as steerpoint but then any refinement will be a target point ... which will then not show in your HUD if you switch to CCIP bombing mode

Give it 10-20hrs and you'll see if you adjust or not. I have reverb G2 nostalgia when i got my Aero but after a week or two it vanished never to return!

doesn't match any of our experiences. What system are you running?

Have a go at the M2000 and you'll see what FBW can do

So far enjoying the F-15 airframe better than the F16s which I find less natural to feel/fly in its responses (both engine and aerodynamic). Also really annoying that F16 still has poor radar functionality (TWS...) + stupid TPOD shortcomings (like the impossible to read north indicating arrow which is needed for any talk on CAS stuff) ... also... I trust Razbam (and the excelent M2000) more for development and realism.

you are welcome to push but it seems we have been pushing on a string...

I tried with 1 and ended buying a second one. Too many blind spots if you turn your head to look at your 6o'clock

I do have the same issue but traced it back to the latest update of DCS-DTC... if I launch that after DCS I do not have the issue CORRECTION... Not DTC. Might be Simshaker for Aviator though

Seems the GBU 28 doesn't track the laser at all?? Am I missing something? Have the GBU with Auto/ 1/STA / N/T Tpod is in auto lase and lasing throughout on 1688... but bomb not tracking

super weird. I assume you run DCS MT and with OpenXR?

I am in mode 0 and I get no mask moving around. The all screen is in NVG mode and focussed. Running MT beta version.

true if you have foveated rendering (aero). not sure how it show with other headsets. Still, mode 0 / full screen makes it totally useable if not realistic

?? Don't understand either what is your problem or what the mod doesn't solve

ok found that Tacca's nvg mod works great. I installed v1.2 but there is also a v1.4

You should try the mirage 2k. That is what brakes should be like

yeah sorry. i got triggered a bit . My point is that this is not satisfactory because most users will effectively not be able to experience the realistic behaviour unless they have the exact type of switch on their joystick. Bindings are here to allow users to recreate the realistic behaviour on different hardwares. The way this one is implemented is not optimal and not even intuitive given how it is labelled in the settings

Yeah so what is your point? ... you are suggesting that applying religiously a realistic setting to an unrealistic throttle hardware is the right thing to do? ... because this is a sim and people use joysticks that are multipurpose and not the exact replica of the hardware. What the sim wants to do is replicate the behaviour. Not pretend that it would be the correct behaviour if you had the proper hardware. Brillant idea!! I'll do that. Did not think about it. thanks