Furia

I have just discovered that we already have some JG73 skins but not for the last DCS Mig-29 version MiG-29G Luftwaffe JG-73 Skin-Pack

I was surprised that I could not find a skin for the Luftwaffe Mig-29 post reunification. I would really appreciate if we could have an skin representing the Jagdgeschwader 73 (JG 73) Steinhoff, that waqs based in Laage by 1999. That would be a great addition to missions and campaings played on the map of Germany and representing post reunification era. Thanks

Eagerly checking your page daily

Ok Thanks. The initial video had a high pitch sound that sounded more in par with smaller props with faster rpm such king air or similars than the what I used to hear from the C-130, however its is true that I am more used to the older variants of the Herc and that may explain the difference. Anyway mine was a comment from a video and if you have recorded the sounds from the real airplane that answers my question and I do stand corrected. Thanks!! Looking forward for its release

I hope they work a bit more on the sound package. The audio on the video regarding the external sounds is not accurate and it is not from a C-130 Hear here a flypass by a C-130 You can see what I mean on this video for instance on minute 12:29 where the high pitch sound is more like a King Air where the smaller props turn a higher speeds. But since this is not yet release and will have some time to polish I hope this is taken care off at some time in the future

From the unofficial FAQ thread

Some answers were provided HERE

Thanks for sharing that! I believe we all understand that this could be affected by unexpected delays, but having a reference target timeframe is highly appreciated. Thanks!

This is video was very well made and it is the confirmation that this module brings quality and completeness. They have even worked the full functionalities of the AMU and from what I saw on the previous video the CNI-MU is also fully implemented and this is easier to say that actually doing it. If it would have not been that I have already pre-purchase it the first day it was available, I would purchase it right now. I can see an incredible potential for missions and since the Airplane Company was "new" on DCS I was a bit cautious on this but seeing what we have seen on the provided videos I LOVE IT, another great third party developer that knows how to do its job !!!

I have installed this mod CH-47F Reduced Cockpit Textures [2K, no MipMaps] and I am now enjoying 140 fps with an excellent quality. I was not happy with the "medium" quality textures but with this mod the quality is awesome and the performance excellent. I know we all hope top have a better solution without having to use mods but at least on the meantime, this helps a lot.

This is a nice idea but it is not fixing the issue with the FOV vs Font size in the Chinook. I have tried with a font size 46 and if you increase the font size in this lua, there are some important data fields that are "boxed", for instance the magnetic heading in the PFD where you cannot see the whole number well since the digits are too big. I do fly helicopters with glass cockpit in real life (AW139) although not the CH-47, and numbers and fonts are made to me easy to read at one glance. Having to play with snapview or zooming inside the cockpit although a temporary solucion should not be "the solution". I hope the devs can take a look at this at sometime since this the the human-machine interface and at this time is not optimal. Other helicopters sucj the Apache or the Kiowa also have MDF that contain easy to read information the way it should. Please when possible, fix this. Thanks!

The helicopter displays the ETE as "hour and tenths of hour" but the correct unit would be Minutes and tenths of minute. Here is one screenshot. One with a WP at 9 NM and with an indicated airspeed of 88 knots. The time to fly there would be around 6 minutes at this speed however the indicator shows ETE 0.1 while it should show ETE 6.0 more or less Could you please fix this. This feature it is actually quite useful for precise navigation, accurate TOT and for coordination with other aircraft while the actual indication of "hour and tenths of hour" is not useful at all. Thanks

Hi guys. Although I do know in real life the OH-58D does only carry 2 pilots, I am planning some missions where the Kiowa Warrior "simulates" the MH-6 Little Bird without mast or hellfires and I would like to have the possibility of adding an extra 4 soldiers as the Littlebird can carry I have tried several ways to add the Kiowa to the list of aircraft either by aircraft type using "OH-58D" or "OH-58D(R)" or even using the pilot name but I do not manage to get the CTLD menu and to load troops. In the same mission I can do it nicely in the UH or other helicopter types. I would like to ask if the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior could be used to carry 4 extra soldiers with CTLD or there is an impossibility for that? Thanks!! EDIT FIXED !!!!! the script recognized the helicopter as "OH58D" and not as "OH-58D" or "OH-58D(R)" it works now !!!

When we are dealing with FMS one of the most important items would be navigation database. While in MSFS we have been using Navigraph for years, I am not sure what are the plans for this on this tittle. Most aircrafts that we do have in DCS until now did not used such kind of navigational databases. it is true that we do not have too many airports to service compared with MSFS numbers but still I do not think this has an easy solution in DCS, so I am eagerly looking forward to see how the development team has approached this

In the previous Anubis C-130J Mod we had the capability of loading, transporting air droping, LAPES or ground offloading vehicles and then drive them with Combined Arms. There was also a way to drop paratroopers with that mod. So I have great hopes with this payware module

Same here !!! Great memories and a lot of flying with that addon We already have a great selection of platforms to launch MK-X, GBU-X, AGM-X, AIM-X.... DCS also need to expand other roles and options and the Hercules and the Chinook are great platforms for that. The C-130 has always been one of my favourite aircrafts of all times so I am really happy to have the option to fly it in DCS.

This is the information available in the FAQ on ASC Discord

Thanks. This looks most useful ¡¡¡

Really awesome. A dream come true for DCE !! Thanks for the video

I would love to have this option. I do never touch a new aircraft without going through the manual. Having the manual even on its early state and missing sone future features would be most welcomed.

Purchased !! I have been waiting for a quality C-130 addon for long time !! Looking forward for its release !!

We do need the option to have CASE II when the appropiate meteorological conditions prevail. You can of course practice or fly missions the way you prefer but at this moment the existing build does not provide CASE II ATC when CASE II meteorological conditions exists unless you add rain that is not an element part of the CASE II criteria.

Although it does work this way, I am afraid that this is not the solution for the problem. Rain should not be as precondition for CASE II. It does not mention rain and if you remove the rain in our actual build of DCS there is no chance to get a CASE II so the bug remains. We should be able to get a CASE II. I am attaching a track where the carrier provides a CASE I acknowledging a "Solid layer at 2000 feet and visibility 6 miles" I have tried countless combinations and it simply goes from CASE I to CASE III but I have not been able to get a CASE II. Of course we could add rain but that may have an undesired effect in other aspects of the mission. We should be able to get a CASE II when the "official" CASE II conditions are met without the need of rain. Would be also great to give the editor the possibility of setting the carrier "CASE" condition through triggers so you can practice CASE II and III without having IMC conditions but it is just a wish. But currently we do have a bug where the carrier does not acknowledge properly the current meteorological condition criteria and unless you add rain or snow, there is no chance of CASE II. Please fix it! No CASE II.trk

I am unable to get a CASE II. I am attaching a track where the carrier provides a CASE I acknowledging a "Solid layer at 2000 feet and visibility 6 miles" I have tried countless combinations and it simply goes from CASE I to CASE III but I have not been able to get a CASE II If any one has a mission preferably in the Marianas with a CASE II scenario and could share it here I would highly appreciate that. No CASE II.trk