FlyBy2507

It's a bitmask (see link below). Processor affinity bitmask Example of code #include <Windows.h> #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main () { HANDLE process = GetCurrentProcess(); DWORD_PTR processAffinityMask = 0; /// What to do here? BOOL success = SetProcessAffinityMask(process, processAffinityMask); cout << success << endl; return 0; }

Does size matter? If so, my ex-girlfriends lied to me!

Remember the back reflection of red panel for the FW190-A8 ? Take months to be fixed.

Enjoy! It's an excellent product.

A chinese ballon ?

Channel area at low resolution? It's a shame!

Workaround

Sorry but buy a powerful computer is not the solution, optimized code is the one. It's a pity that someone like Reflected Simulation needs to cheat with number of bomber who drop their bomb or needs to challenge the AI behaviour.

<sarcasm> As fps eater? </sarcasm>

Well, there's always hope...

Why did you removed the passage of Brigg's post in DD_Fendir's answer? A bias perhaps or you have not read it?

In 30 years someone will say exactly the same.

Seems there is an option somewhere where we can delay the tacview flow from server to client to avoid cheating.

Hope that helps

Lense flare.

I understand your point of view and respect it. (sarcasm)but then they need change the name, for WW2 era, as DFS and disarm the planes.(/sarcasm) Got it. Fly safe.

Really ? Aren't you shocked by the inconsistent WW2 planeset?

I agree with you but in the current planeset, she will feel very lonely and very vulnerable.

They fix mossie bugs first I guess...

Here: https://stormofwar.info and here : https://stormofwar.info/fw190a8bugs.php#dh98

Same problem on the FW190-A8. Tube with rocket not fired can be jettisoned. Empty tube can not. Reported since March 2020.

if anyone wants a bug free FW190-A8 he will have to wait a looooooong time.

J'ai remarquer que la courbe appliquée au tangage avait une forte influence sur le trim. Essaye d'appliquer une valeur plus faible (10 ou 15). Joystick MS force Feedback

<sarcasm> That justifies settling for buggy modules. </sarcasm>

Read this on the SOW website : <==== Status update: 13 July 2021 Based on comments from ED staff on Discord and Youtube, we have been led to believe that ED will move resources to at least some of these bugs once the Mosquito is released. SoW will not be integrating the Mosquito into the server's plane-sets until the promised bug fixes are delivered to the customers. DCS FW 190 A-8 problems... ====> Legitimate decision when we know that the designers of the missions on SOW try to be historically very accurate. Mine is not more purchase of modules, maps, add-on until ED fixes bugs (sometimes very old) on the WWII era, especially on the Anton.