Laud

BUT: The 6950 are 50 and not 70 for some reason. + A little more performance - Higher probability of graphic errors (due to the gpu failing the tests to become a 70) - Higher temperatures -> more noise by the cooling vents I chose to run it as it is, because I hate PCs that are louder than my AC! ;)

Just read through the thread and noticed, that this is the only answer to the TOs question "Are tank mounted MGs are too strong?" while all the others (19!!) told him how to fly and fight... :lol:

Had that once for LO. Good job!

That would be really awesome! TY!

Took ramp initially. But for some reason I had to change it to some other state, then roll back to "from ramp" and then the checkbox appears. TY for helping!

Title says it all... When I put an AI aircraft on an airfield, I can't set it to "uncontrolled" anymore. The checkbox isn't available. Taking a 1.2.5 mission, I copy and paste a group with the "uncontrolled"-checkbox ticked on and ending up with a unit/group with no "uncontrolled" checkbox. ??

Any news on this? Still an issue?

What I would do: 1. Let the respective AC l and and observe to which parking position it will taxi. 2. Place a small Trigger Zone at the parking position, and create a trigger with 'unit (or group) in zone', setting a certain flag. 3. Add a trigger with 'time since flag' (for example 300 sec for unloading) AND 'unit (or group) alive' to set another flag. 4. Add a trigger with 'flag is true [your #]' and 'group activate [your reinforcements/supplies]'

Great! TY Paul!!

I have, even though it's not labeled with 'TacView'... ;) But I'm asking for a fresh install and not for moving my old (not) existing installation. I always get an error-msg, whether I tell TacView the real install folder (where I manually created the 'Scripts' folder) of DCS or the Folder in C:\Users\...\DCS.

Vyrtuoz, could you please have look on how to install TacView to DCS-World 1.2.3?! Seems not to work anymore, due to the changed folder structure. TY!

Plus ED fixing DCS World so it can handle 60 clients again... :music_whistling:

As Pilot AND ATC would need to be human It would be kind of MP. However, of course you can fly with only one human controlled aircraft and a human ATC.

Finally something ON topic: Even though I don't know about its A-A capabilities... ;)

Excellent stuff Viper!!! :)

That must be the reason why they came up with LGBs and JDAMs... :)

No matter how many of them three?? :noexpression: (Honestly: Would you want to bring someone to a CAS mission as long as he's not capable to place at least only one out of three bombs within 125ft of the target?? ;) :P ) :music_whistling:

Got a question regarding scoring (based on the SOP): 45HADB: RPL SGL 3, 75ft Scoring: 10pts within 125ft How will this be measured? From the center of the target to the center of the ripple-impact or from the center of the target to the outer border of the ripple-impact?

Great!! TY!!

:thumbup: TY!

Nice one! How about adding an index of acronyms (the delivery-titles are not really always self-explaining ;) )?

To sum it up: Vehicle behaviour is quite correct, except the lack of ability to search for an effective cover. However, (un-)mounting troops for ground vehicles (and helicopters?!!) would be VERY helpful for various situations you may want to create with the mission editor (i.e. soldiers defending their vehicles (and themselves), troops brought to the fight/evacuated from a position by trucks, APCs or choppers, SAR,...). A lot of improvement that could be gained by just that one feature!

The most disappointing thing is, that things seem to look not too promising when it comes to scenery addons in general...

TY Wags for this very detailed statement! Honestly, I alway wondered why your stuff is not way more expensive! So thank you also to ED for a more than fair pricing policy. :thumbup:

I think he means CCIP with LDGP Bombs (which comes along with a bit more altitude). ;)