Jump to content

Jenson

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    300

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Jenson

  1. Jenson
    Here is my wallet, 59.99USD is prepared.
  2. Jenson
    Mission 10 Link: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3328128/ Kneeboard added for mission 01, 02 and 10, I need more time to create those kneeboard pages for other missions, cheers!
  3. Jenson
    Didn't know how to do that before, but will give it a try.
  4. Jenson
    Merry Christmas, update mission 09 https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3328064/
  5. Jenson
    Mission 08 https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3327901/
  6. Jenson
    Mission 07 Operation Hormuz Mission 07 (digitalcombatsimulator.com) [The mission is updated on 11 Dec 2022 again with several bug fix, please re-download and enjoy]
  7. Jenson
    Agreed. But with Steam edition, there is only two version available to choose, 2.5.xxx or Open Beta, I hope ED could let us choose the latest stable version as well.
  8. Jenson
    The Sixth mission is out now. Operation Hormuz Mission 06 (digitalcombatsimulator.com)
  9. Jenson
    As I flew a few missions during the weekend in VR, my feeling is that not only performance dropped in 2.8, but the image quality also gets worse than 2.7. When I look around (in VR), the contrast/brightness will adjust automatically but not in a natural way, which gives a poor experience. In the last 2.7 version, the scene looks much more natural than 2.8 (in VR, maybe it looks better in 2D with 2.8). I assume it's an issue from contrast/shadow but not sure. I hope ED could take this issue more seriously and fix both quality and performance issues in 2.8, otherwise the upgrade looks like a step backward for me (not intend to be negative but just wanna give this feedback to the developement team) Thank you ED as always!
  10. Jenson
    Hi Maverick87Shaka, thanks for your reply. Unfortunately, I found that the aircraft are not (always) arranged by its callsign even in the same group, i.e. Ford 1-2 in first row, Ford 1-3 in second row, Ford 1-4 in third row, and finally Ford 1-1 in fourth row. I selected the first aircraft in the list but didn't notice I was in Ford 1-2 I saw that my Tail Number was wrong, then I go back to the aircraft selection window and see that the aircraft isn't arranged by the full callsign, maybe it has changed after 2.8. Even so, for most of times, players don't pay much attention to their tail #, and also Ford 1-3 could have a tail # far apart from Ford 1-2 and Ford 1-1. I do look forward to seeing ED finishing the ready room, and if possible, after the briefing, player could walk to their aircraft based on the tail # of their assigned aircrafts.
  11. Jenson
    I wonder if it could be integrated as an official module or function in the future?
  12. Jenson
    Agreed. Hopefully they will get this removed in next patch, and hopefully next patch won't be too long.
  13. Jenson
    In aircraft selection window, it only shows the unit's Group Name, Tail Number, but doesn't show full callsign or pilot's name. As a result, players can't tell which aircraft is the flight Lead, and for some multiplayer cooperation missions, triggers are linked to flight Lead only. Could developer team add an column to show the full callsign such as Enfield 1-1, Enfield 1-2, Enfield 1-3 etc. @BIGNEWY Thanks.
  14. Jenson
    Here comes the fifth mission. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3326697/
  15. Jenson
    I've been creating multiplayer missions and when I flew these mission with my squadron friends, we always encounter "your flight is delayed to start" issue in the beginning when the server starts. I'm sure I have spared enough space for the normal spawn/respawn points on deck but still some of the multiplayer clients couldn't get a spawn space on deck. Anyone also encountered the same issue? and how should we do to circumvent this issue? Thank you.
  16. Jenson
    I experienced the same issue, huge fps drop (from 60 to 45) after upgrading 2.8. Personally, I wouldn't trade a 20-25% fps drop for a nicer / dymanic weather etc. 2.7 works just fine for me. Thinking to roll back to 2.7 stable version now. I understand ED is trying their best to improve players experience in every update they release, but just want to add this feedback to bring more attention. Please fix this issue so the game is at least playable, thank you!
  17. Jenson
    in 2.7 i have 60fps in sky but now with 2.8 i only have 45fps, i'm so sad with 2.8.
  18. Jenson
    And yet, this bug still there
  19. Jenson
    Here's the fourth mission, hope you enjoy it. Operation Hormuz Mission 04 (digitalcombatsimulator.com)
  20. Jenson
    Thank you sir!
  21. Jenson
    Hey guys, please leave a comment of what type of task do you want to play in the next mission. Several options are as follow: 1. Anti-ship search and strike 2. Precise attack with Laser bombs 3. Low level in with pop up bombing Cheers!
  22. Jenson
    Here comes the 3rd mission. (There was a revision after initial upload, fixed several bugs, please re-download it if you had downloaded the old one before 24 Sep 2022 noon time) Operation Hormuz Mission 03 (digitalcombatsimulator.com) Pls let me know how you like this campaign, any good ideas or future development, and any bugs need to be fixed, thanks!
  23. Jenson
    Hi TLA, thanks for the notice, HARM code has been corrected now.
  24. Jenson
    Hey all, Here comes the 2nd mission of the series. Let me know how do you like the mission and any feedback is welcome. Also special thanks to @toutenglisse who taught me a lot with the Mission Editor. Operation Hormuz Mission 02 (digitalcombatsimulator.com) Thank you!
  25. Jenson
    It works! Thank you Toutenglisse, you're a magician!
×
×
  • Create New...