Snoopy

And while they’re at it sync clouds for all clients in MP.

I can’t post tech data due to rule 1.16 but I’m curious if ED plans to correct the symbology that is incorrect.

If the USAF goes through with the purchase the F-15X will be the most advanced.

Which we shouldn’t have with the suite we have in DCS World. With some suite 5 isms as well

They have but in all my deployments we have never carried an external with combat loads.

That is how the externals on the A-10 work. I’m not at home so i cant quote the exact text but external fuel tanks on the A-10 feed the wing tanks which feed the mains which feed the engines.

476 vFG's 7th anniversary sortie yesterday afternoon.

Nope currently AI only or when you repair. And realistically when we recover A-10s the only door out of those we open is W79 (panel on the top of the left MLG pod).

Hope the HAS pictures aren’t from Incirlik (can’t tell) cause if they are they’re not correct.

Because ED considers the A-10C feature complete aka no updates to the current module. I’d the won’t fix improper things like a windmilling engine producing 3000 psi or the flaps bleeding down when engines are off they ain’t gonna add new sounds.

The chance of getting the actual real world sounds is slim.

As long as we’re given credit feel free to use however you’d like.

It would be GREAT but without a DCS A-10C 2 being sold (which would be a day one purchase for me) it ain’t gonna happen. Like said above the HMCS was introduced in suite 7 (suite 7 plus if memory serves me correctly). I remember talking to my pilots when it was introduced initially. The “old timers” weren’t a fan of the HMCS because they felt sensory overload but the younger pilots loved it.

Uhm nope, I typed exactly what I meant. Sorry sir, my apologies.

Yes we are, but jet wake would make it more interesting for those of us refueling off the boom.

Now give us jet wash and air refueling behind a KC-135 will get real interesting.

Wake turbulence....does this apply to all aircraft (aka KC-135, KC-130 more specially) or just the Hornet? Not clear to me based on how the news letter was written.

Hahahahaha....okay

I’d much rather RAZBAM focus on what we already have with the Mirage and Harrier, neither of which are complete than continuing to show pictures of a “passion project.” Even more so since ED doesn’t feel the MiG-19 isn’t ready for release. Doesn’t look good from a PR perspective IMO.

Please don’t. Incirlik specifically has hardened shelters missing in the Gulf, India, and Hotel loops and hangers placed where they shouldn’t be. I sent an email to Urga-Media offering help and provide real world info for taxiway labels but haven’t gotten a response.

.

Looks good but curious how a product still in EA (as people always point out when others have complaints about systems not being completed) can have a mid-life upgrade?

I know years ago I supplied the info to one of the devs to make the test interactive but that was after the A-10C was considered feature complete so it didn't get updated. Not a big deal, most people would get tired of having to do it anyways.

You guessed wrong.

In DCS world it isn’t modeled correctly. Pilots have to interact for the test to proceed on the real a-10