Snoopy

If Kandahar isn’t included I won’t purchase the map. Kandahar Has been one of the main places we’ve deployed to with A-10s and they’re there now.

ED changed the names of the MFCDS for export. I’m not at home but fixed it on mine. ADDED I changed it to "LEFT_MFCD" and "RIGHT_MFCD" in the monitor setup lua I use.

Track, video, any evidence besides your statement? If not ED won't look into it until they have those things.

No issues with this mod or Rangers with 2.5.4. Do you have them installed in your saved games, Mods/tech folder?

Outside of the cockpit 3d model I’m happy with the A-10C model. Yeah if we someday got an upgrade to suite 7 (or higher) some things would need to be added (LARS antennas) or removed (pave penny and pylon) but again we’re very unlikely to get those. New cockpit model with the option to turn the pilots body on/off and I’m happy.

Pictures from Mission 1 of Operation Vanguard Anvil

If you searched you'd find at least a dozen posts/threads saying the same thing.

I saw messed up taxi lines when the map was first introduced, but it is a lot worse now than when initially released. Ironically similar issues with taxiway lines at Nellis happened when they pushed the update that introduced all the new airports, so it's a trend. Anyways, this is what I see now (and many other areas have similar issues around Al Dhafra).

A lot changed from suite 3/5 that we currently have and suite 7 where HMCS was added. It’s not just a simple “add the helmet display.” I want a suite 7 plus or 8 A-10C but I’ve accepted ED isn’t gonna do it.

That’s not exactly true either. It’s a hybrid of suite 3 and 5.

I stopped trying to keep post one updated due to Razbams infrequent communication in when systems are implemented and the issue that things were implemented but not completely finished. Personally I’d be okay if this thread was deleted.

Any plans to fix the taxi lines at Al Dhafra? They look like whoever painted them was drunk and IMO kills an otherwise outstanding representation of the base.

That is incorrect, HMCS wasn’t a thing when DCS A-10C was released. The reason we won’t get HMCS is because it was added to the real a-10C in a later suite than we have in the simulator and ED doesn’t plan to update the A-10C.

Psh....lost all respect because “labels”. Lol

Technically the A-10C has never carried an “E” model maverick. The Air Force designation is “L” and yes the A-10C can and does carry them. We shot off a lot my last deployment.

Germany, Spain, Oman, Saudi Arabia, to name a few, were there the same time as me.

Basically

Happened during landing.

If you're in maintenance you should have access in to get the same TO that I did to provide ED the reasons why a windmilling engine wouldn't product hydraulic power like it does in DCS World. I'd happily tell you what it is through .mil email traffic, but not on the forums or through PMs. Here's some damage from a bird strike one of my birds took at Hawgsmoke this year.

The search function on the forum works, plenty of discussions about this over the years. Not to mention the below rule: 1.16 Posting images, file links, and file sharing links of military aircraft documents newer than 1980 is strictly prohibited on our forums. Such posts will be removed.

So what is this post trying to do? It’s wrong, I supplied the data to ED, and i know it’s wrong from real world experience working A-10s.

It's not sensitive at all, I sent the info straight to Nineline, no reason to post it publicly especially with EDs rule about Tech Data posts.

I agree, especially since I was deployed there three years ago launching A-10s against ISIS into Syria.