Snoopy

Updated AN/AAQ-28 repaint for new model in 2.5.5 http://www.476vfightergroup.com/downloads.php?do=file&id=489

Currently our Range Objects mod isn't working, we'll troubleshoot and hopefully get them working again. Unfortunately ED doesn't share any information to anyone that isn't an approved 3rd party so hopefully we can figure it out. If not IMO it will make the NTTR map utterly useless. IMO it's hard to call something the DCS: Nevada Test and Training Range Map without the community mod to realistically populate said ranges.

We’re aware and will attempt to fix. Unfortunately ED doesn't share any information to anyone that isn't an approved 3rd party so hopefully we can figure it out. If not IMO it will make the NTTR map utterly useless. IMO it's hard to call something the DCS: Nevada Test and Training Range Map without the community mod to realistically populate said ranges.

The external engine sound is terrible now, it sounds nothing like a real A-10.

Same here but that’s a chance we take when we use mods and even more so when the mod basically hasn’t been supported in years.

Spent most of the day working on the UAE/Oman FLIP. Below is the updated Table on Contents, UAE & Oman QRL, and Al Dhafra APD updated with what ED finalized with the release of the PG map. Hopefully will have this completed and available to the public before the end of June.

It looked to me like Incirlik AB isn’t modeled correctly. Especially the Golf, Hotel and India loops

Now y’all understand why I don’t post much anymore especially concerning the A-10C. ;)

It being a 3rd party created map it would be up to them to update/fix not ED

All the disappearing features in less than a week from when the preorder window is going to open isn’t good business IMO. You would think these things would have been worked out and decided earlier. I had planned on preordering first thing when available but I’ll wait now.

Just saying.... NATOPS statements DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT C — Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies only and their contractors to protect publications required for official use or for administrative or operational purposes only (15 September 2015). Other requests for this document shall be referred to Commander, Naval Air Systems Command. USAF Tech Data statements DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT - E - Distribution authorized to DoD Components only (Direct Military Support) (10 February 2019). Other requests for this document shall be referred to X-XX System Program Office. WARNING - This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, U.S.C., Sec 2751, et seq.) or the Export Administration Act of 1979 (Title 50, U.S.C., App. 2401 et seq.), as amended. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties. Disseminate in accordance with provisions of DoD Directive 5230.25.

Probably not, we’re doing a much smaller FLIP internally that wouldn’t include all the charts (Al Dhafra and Al Minhad). Not to mention the time it takes to make these because unlike Nevada where all the charts are publicly available and only had to be updated for DCS values PG airfield charts are not available.

Wanting to and actively trying to get those manuals are two different things. ITAR restrictions are no joking matter.

Actually we didn't make those, we have our own but IIRC JaBog made the ones for the Caucasus.

I did one but it I removed it from the 476th downloads section when the new models were introduced.

ED has never made charts to go along with the maps. Everything that’s included was either made by the community and added by ED (Caucasus) or real world (NTTR). Charts for the PG area aren’t easily acquired through google so unless a community members creates, and agrees to let ED include them it ain’t gonna happen.

Sorry but can’t take Wikipedia references seriously. Eddie didn’t say it was the ONLY base but it is in fact one of the important bases.

I was going to do another repaint mod based on various training mavs at Moody for the new models but can seem to get motivated.

And while they’re at it sync clouds for all clients in MP.

I can’t post tech data due to rule 1.16 but I’m curious if ED plans to correct the symbology that is incorrect.

If the USAF goes through with the purchase the F-15X will be the most advanced.

Which we shouldn’t have with the suite we have in DCS World. With some suite 5 isms as well

They have but in all my deployments we have never carried an external with combat loads.

That is how the externals on the A-10 work. I’m not at home so i cant quote the exact text but external fuel tanks on the A-10 feed the wing tanks which feed the mains which feed the engines.