Snoopy

Just saying.... NATOPS statements DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT C — Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies only and their contractors to protect publications required for official use or for administrative or operational purposes only (15 September 2015). Other requests for this document shall be referred to Commander, Naval Air Systems Command. USAF Tech Data statements DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT - E - Distribution authorized to DoD Components only (Direct Military Support) (10 February 2019). Other requests for this document shall be referred to X-XX System Program Office. WARNING - This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, U.S.C., Sec 2751, et seq.) or the Export Administration Act of 1979 (Title 50, U.S.C., App. 2401 et seq.), as amended. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties. Disseminate in accordance with provisions of DoD Directive 5230.25.

Probably not, we’re doing a much smaller FLIP internally that wouldn’t include all the charts (Al Dhafra and Al Minhad). Not to mention the time it takes to make these because unlike Nevada where all the charts are publicly available and only had to be updated for DCS values PG airfield charts are not available.

Wanting to and actively trying to get those manuals are two different things. ITAR restrictions are no joking matter.

Actually we didn't make those, we have our own but IIRC JaBog made the ones for the Caucasus.

I did one but it I removed it from the 476th downloads section when the new models were introduced.

ED has never made charts to go along with the maps. Everything that’s included was either made by the community and added by ED (Caucasus) or real world (NTTR). Charts for the PG area aren’t easily acquired through google so unless a community members creates, and agrees to let ED include them it ain’t gonna happen.

Sorry but can’t take Wikipedia references seriously. Eddie didn’t say it was the ONLY base but it is in fact one of the important bases.

I was going to do another repaint mod based on various training mavs at Moody for the new models but can seem to get motivated.

And while they’re at it sync clouds for all clients in MP.

I can’t post tech data due to rule 1.16 but I’m curious if ED plans to correct the symbology that is incorrect.

If the USAF goes through with the purchase the F-15X will be the most advanced.

Which we shouldn’t have with the suite we have in DCS World. With some suite 5 isms as well

They have but in all my deployments we have never carried an external with combat loads.

That is how the externals on the A-10 work. I’m not at home so i cant quote the exact text but external fuel tanks on the A-10 feed the wing tanks which feed the mains which feed the engines.

476 vFG's 7th anniversary sortie yesterday afternoon.

Nope currently AI only or when you repair. And realistically when we recover A-10s the only door out of those we open is W79 (panel on the top of the left MLG pod).

Hope the HAS pictures aren’t from Incirlik (can’t tell) cause if they are they’re not correct.

Because ED considers the A-10C feature complete aka no updates to the current module. I’d the won’t fix improper things like a windmilling engine producing 3000 psi or the flaps bleeding down when engines are off they ain’t gonna add new sounds.

The chance of getting the actual real world sounds is slim.

As long as we’re given credit feel free to use however you’d like.

It would be GREAT but without a DCS A-10C 2 being sold (which would be a day one purchase for me) it ain’t gonna happen. Like said above the HMCS was introduced in suite 7 (suite 7 plus if memory serves me correctly). I remember talking to my pilots when it was introduced initially. The “old timers” weren’t a fan of the HMCS because they felt sensory overload but the younger pilots loved it.

Uhm nope, I typed exactly what I meant. Sorry sir, my apologies.

Yes we are, but jet wake would make it more interesting for those of us refueling off the boom.

Now give us jet wash and air refueling behind a KC-135 will get real interesting.