miguelaco

IMHO DCS A-10C needs another patch. CTD, multiplayer, and many other things should be addressed. What I'd like to know is whether there will be another patch or not. And by patch I mean some update to the software that actually fix major problems, not some compatibility patch that happens to fix minor things here and there. Why is it so hard to say a simple yes or no?

+1 amen to that. I won't buy any new product until DCS: A-10C is reasonably fixed, specially in MP.

+1 Let me add, if you please: 7) ATC improvement: more messages, METAR reports, better logic for taxi spacing and slot assignment.

+1, volar el P-51D no me entusiasma demasiado y menos en el escenario actual de la serie DCS. De todos modos me alegro que esta gente siga desarrollando nuevos productos y espero que ganen mucho dinero con el Mustang para poder financiar el resto de proyectos que en mi opinión tienen mayor interés que este.

Thx!

Patch working great here. Thx ED for those needed bug fixes! It'd be perfect if refueling was corrected in MP. Still have to abort refuel many times to allow my mates contact the tanker properly.

Not only ATC, all comms in general. Tanker, ATC, AWACS, friendly flights... All need an improvement. And add the MP factor which seems to worsen things even more.

I think it's a known issue with 1.1.1.0, but let's wait for some testers to confirm

+1, it'll make rainy missions more immersive, but focus on bugs and stability issues first, of course.

TACAN/ADI offset has been reported as fixed, so chances are that it will make it into the little patch/hotfix.

Wonderful news!!

Well I guess I'm half with the whiners here. I'm probably not going to buy FC3 and Flying Legends. If FC3 maintain the same simulation level as FC2, I know I'm not going to fly it. It surely could make some interesting missions with A-10C and Ka-50, though. DCS Flying Legends is another story with the same ending. I'm afraid it will not appeal me as I like modern planes more than WW2 or WW1. Also, there are other sims covering these periods in high fidelity. Look at Cliffs of Dover, we all know that sim as today, but what will be its state when DCS Flying Legends come out?. Probably very good and it includes a very interesting theater and more flyables. So to conclude, I'm very interested in everything that expands the current DCS world, maintaining the same simulation level. I know Combined arms, Nevada and the new US jet are my priorities and will be on my hard drive, but meanwhile, we have an A-10C waiting to be finished off.

Thanks Nate, it's ok. Not a critical issue but an issue nonetheless. Regards.

Fixed HSI Course offset from heading by approx 5 degrees. EDITED: Wrong thread. Created new thread at: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=1328905#post1328905 Sorry.

Bug still exists in 1.1.1.0. Thought it was corrected since it had a line in the changelog: The bug looks the same that in Mustang's screenshots, but I can provide new ones if you need/wish.

Have an issue with my accounts (probably registered with two different email addresses): miguelaco miguelaco1 I have purchased FC2 and DCS WH from the ED site, but after login with "miguelaco" I click on purchases and there's nothing there. With "miguelaco1" I can see my DCS: WH purchase. All my copies work perfect in multiplayer, but I cannot get my codes from the web. Am I doing something wrong? Can I have all my purchases associated to "miguelaco" account?

Ohhhhhh, yeah!

Sure you'll be able to record your own very soon :thumbup: (hopefully)

Is laser beam supposed to be visible with NVGs? For A-10C to see TGP LOS of another IR pointer is needed. Which leads me to the following: is it possible for a Warthog to act as night AFAC for a group of Sharks and designate targets using IR pointer? Shark pilots should be able to see the IR beam with NVGs, isn't it?

There is no patch yet. Expect it next week according to latest Wags statement.

This is a good one and inline with my requests a few posts above. I'd like to have clients in the same flight and ATC & AWACS & tanker AI take this into account when communicating.

Wonderful news!! Many thanks!

Look here: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=79163&highlight=offset+page Also, I'm providing three sample images showing the problem when creating a new waypoint providing mh/dis of 180/90. In the third image you can see actual offset is 7 degrees off:

Many thanks. How about the offset page problem? I guess it's been solved in the same pack. Can we have a confirmation?

Any word on this. I still don't know if it's a bug or not, but just in case, I'd like to see it explained/acknowledged. Thx in advance.