Jump to content

muzica9

Members
  • Posts

    111
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by muzica9

  1. how do you make it stay toghether? any link for the Apache head strap ? yeah. basicaly we need something similar to G2 with pancake lens. Built in tracking, good audio solution, no battery, no standalone, just PCVR. That is why Aero is not an option for me.
  2. It has been 3 days since I received my Pimax crystal. The good: excellent image quality, great colors, and a very light optical cable. That is all. The bad: - facial foams (both of them) do not fill your face; there is a big gap on both sides; moving your head around breaks your sweetspot. -lens have visible sweetspot and is very weird, moving your head you can clearly see the difference in plane sims - lens distortion on sides but very visible on the bottom of the lens in menus and plane sims - ghosting on the edges when moving your head left or right - 30-40% less fps/performance than HP G2 in plane sims with high end pc with RTX 4090. even with lowered resolution, even if i set similar resolution as HP G2 in Open XR Toolkit -dmas is not bad, but i still think HP G2 speakers are better -tracking in dim light is better for the HP G2 - Controllers are a joke -power hub in the package is junk - overall build quality doesn't justify the 1900 euro product -you can see led light from the power button in the helmet -Pimax Client/ Pi server eat 10-13% cpu usage and 5-10% gpu usage even on standby, even with helmet powered off. If they don't release eye tracking and DFR in 10 days to recover some of the performance, i will return it. I hate to be an early adopter, especially when i read now that they plan to make changes to the design to fix the problems with comfort.
  3. have any effect at this moment without pimax sofware eye tracking not being ready? LE: after testing: have effect, but image quality is bad. so we need to wait for pimax update
  4. i get this error with openXR version. do not close and do not work in game files are in game \bin directory
  5. right click>>properties>security>>check unblock. do this to archive before extract.
  6. thanks. i have managed to make the .bat file work as single file but do not know how to implement to DCS Updater GUI Utility script box
  7. Yes but look at cpu frametime not only at fps
  8. why is not better than intel 12900 in this video?
  9. Asus has been a joke for a while. What to understand after watch full video and conclusion? The bios updates do not solve the problem? Issue is bigger than software?
  10. by how much exactly? i have now also i9 10900K
  11. In vr above 45 fps? Heavy duty missions?
  12. this problem with fps in cockpit was also in 1.8.0 version, 1.5 years ago. great mod but unplayable.
  13. why is the fps so low in cockpit in vr? if press f2/outside i have +40-50% more fps. 80-90 vs only 45fps inside.
  14. yes. is completely broken for native open xr. only works with opencomposite wich MT version is not recognized.
  15. don't count on ED to solve this problems for FC3 based mods
  16. i did not ask ED. i just pointed that all aircraft mods based on FC3 are dead. also, at this state, this mods can not be repaired without help or guidence from ED.
  17. no stutters and no ghosting in my case. at least i don't see something wrong or something to bother me. but, 60hz for g2 is strobe disco club. with or without virtual sunglasses
  18. all aircraft mods based on FC3 don't work in MT. hope will be a fix
  19. i run at much, much higher settings. clouds at ultra(can't accept less for vr), open xr tlk turbo mode+Frame Rate Throttling 61 fps+Foveated rendering - quality /wide all stable at 60 fps no matter scenario(heavy or low), in ST or MT, at 90hz for G2 only difference in specs: CPU I9 10850k and 48 gb ram btw: i keep my 4090 at 80% power limit as i see no difference in terms of perfomance for DCS or in general.
×
×
  • Create New...