fausete

Mmmm I don't know if this has always been the case. Can you open a bug report to ED, please?

Might be related to the problem you described in another post of the missile entering the cockpit, as maybe with the different size of the BE there is some sort of collision. That problem was in theory fixed by ED a while ago, but judging by your posts it might have resurfaced. All this is speculation of course, we will need to gather more evidence.

Thanks for the report, we will take a look!

Hi @Loukuins, Does this only happen from the back seat? Can you post a TRK?

Hi, This is very likely an ED issue. Could you produce a track and either post it here or post it straight to ED?

Thanks! Keep us updated with the findings

Thanks for the report, is this related to the GBU code adjustment for AI you have commented in the other thread?

Thanks for the report Brems, we will check

Glad you like it

It was like this in the real aircraft (otherwise we would have simulated it in the old panel). Only a few aircraft got equipped with the new IFF panel and crypto unit before the modernisation to the F1M (all of which were equipped with Mode 4). We didn't want to force such a radical change of look in the aircraft cockpit considering that only very few of them actually had the Mode 4 capable IFF and towards the very end of their service life.

Hi, The old panel only has modes 1, 2 and 3 available. Mode 4 won't work despite the panel having the correspondent dials.

Yes, tomorrow they will be public :). More seriously, IFF transponder, the 2310 L tank and many, many bug fixes. This patch has been more about solidifying what is released now, to prepare for additional content in the future. Fortunately, it was added many weeks ago as a result of a petition from users . Take into account that there are internal deadlines so it's impossible to publish new content this fast (and for good reason).

Hi, it is coming on Wednesday's update.

Hi @Rudel_chw! Good document for a more complete start process. Just to clarify, both the incidence test switch and the flight control test panel are fully simulated now.

Hi guys, For both the missile and the cannons we use the DCS standard model (which is what we should use in principle, keep in mind the M-2000 was released before ED took control of weapon implementation and the F1 afterwards). The missile seeker while the missile is still on the aircraft is our own model and DCS' model the instant it is fired. We will contact RB to see if they have info, what if any different design choices they took... This might be something that doesn't need a fix, something that we can change (in the case of the seeker) or something that needs ED's intervention. Just to reiterate and be clear. None of the weapons behaviour themselves have been developed by us, irregardless of the internal naming, ED is now in charge of weapon modelling.

Hi, This sounds like a damaged install. We advise you perform a repair on your install.

Hi guys, Can confirm, one click is one litre.

Hi, It is indeed a bug, it has been fixed internally. Note that, in the meantime, the clickable switch on the right side of the seat does work correctly.

Hi, Thanks for the work reporting. In order to isolate possible sources of the issue, can you repeat the tests with the sight repeater in the rear cockpit turned off?

Hi, which map is this on (and which version)? Would it be possible to test the same in the Caucasus?

Hi, can you include a TRK please (in the Caucasus and SP). Take into account you might be flying into the wake of the tanker.

You're welcome, it's the three kings night in Spain so I thought we could deliver a present

Okay, we've properly added the RPL201 to the flyable F1s. Should be available in the next update most likely.

Okay, then it's a matter of the detotaliser not detecting it. From what I see in the code, the refuel should also not work correctly. Once we get all this adapted for the RPL 201, we will add it for all aircraft.

Exactly, and as the tank empties, the shift upwards of the CoG wouldn't be taken into account, and the computations of the remaining fuel in the aircraft would also be wrong.