BigBorner

Ah, now i understand what you mean, sorry. Maybe its an artifact of debug settings that hasnt been changed.

You pre-program certain Landmarks in the Nav System with their coordinates. Then you lock this point via Shkval (or fly over that). Then you tell the INS that you just showed it this known point with known coordinates. Using that Info, INS can correct the drift because you just told it for a brief moment where the airframe really really is right now.

It has an Instrument showing you remaining fuel and fuel consumption per Engine since the start, yes. Below your right Display. The Data Page for Range / Endurance / Remaining Fuel at Waypoint / ToT etc. is not working yet.

nope

That is also in my "I steal everything Notso says" Kneeboard.

Yeah, thats how it is. 12 CBUs with depending skeets and stuff is kinda torture for your computer. It had to simulate 480 of them in your case. Before upgrading my PC, it made it crash instantly when looking at that mayhem in F6 or F7 View lol

I cant see the Jeff properly. there is something in the way.

Do you have the PP entered in the UFP as current waypoint? Otherwise having a PP point does not help with a LD-10

In contrast, BetAB 500 Shp. (the russian rocket booster bomb with parachute) do work in CCRP above 1000 feet. I have tested those with SU-25T at 1200 and 1500 ft AGL.

Np. Hm, maybe i will give the BetABs a test and see if there are also broken. Mudhen is also slated to get the Durandals.

Runway bomb =\= Glidebomb.

Thank you for the Info! Can you say something to the runway bombs? Those are not functional for a year now. Are you also checking on the SPI Logic (AG Radar sets them by itself) and the TGPs CCD Mode, that for some reason has WHOT and BHOT modes?

Hm, i encountered that i was abled to slew while in SP during testing of the Runway bombs in the current OB. Stupid question, but: The MFD was marked as "SOI" i.e. Star in the Bottom?

And a track to second that. GB6 Short.trk

Because, as far as i know , the symbology for being jammed in the F-16 is quite different and less intrusive, but also gives you less information about the jamming source. Plus, i have the feeling, the F-15E Radar is at the moment especially vulnerable to jamming. Or its just a consequence of the Strike Eagle having a huge radar antenna compared to the F-16, so its also "seeing" jamming earlier. And Counter Jamming technologies are not simulated in the mudhen (yet?) Or its just a combination of all of those factors. In Summary - I dont think that you are doing something wrong or so. Its just what it is.

By eliminating the dude thats jamming. Or ask nicely in case its a blue dude.

I tested yesterday, and its still not working. No chance to drop them above 1000 feet. (Occasionaly it also does not work in between 960 and 1000 feet)

I’ve placed a JSOW directly above a Flat Face SR and it managed to damage it by a whole 32%. I can understand that it’s a biiit frustrating sometimes for some…

„Known issue“ as in they knew that the latest open beta we got this week would break LS-6 and GB-6. and „internally fixed“ as in the next update we are getting will fix them. Hopefully.

If you can still make out the DL Number of the contact, you can crosscheck against the DL contact list on the bottom of the HSD screen. There should be the altitude, too.

It’s not fixed and as per uboats it won’t be fixed with the next update either.

nah its postponed to wednesday

Oh. idk if its more sad that its not fixed or that you only figured that out on the release day of the next update. Did you think about changing the bugfix approach from "lets wait if the issue solves itself" to an approach thats a bit more proactive? Or is this just a sugarcoated abandonment of the module? Can we expect the same with the Peace Pearl once its released and out of EA? Can you give an official statement on DEKAs view on continued support of modules? Whats the overall strategie?

So it’ll be fixed with the update slated for today?

I’m going to upload the miz later today. You can also extract the EXACT miz I used from the trackfiles I posted. Just unzip them. I will recreate your and mine test once todays OB update dropped. I decided that i wont waste any time on testing the Jeff anymore until the community gets an update on how dekas strategy looks to keep it compatible with EDs changes.