Jump to content

Gryzor

Members
  • Posts

    1221
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Gryzor

  1. Try to land in new supercarrier and look when approaching to IFOLS lights. Let me know please if you don´t notice any rare... rendered in one eye at medium distance (not at the end). Like that bug, there a lot of rendering problems with other objects, seems that some specific distances are incorrectly rendered. That is not happens in 2.5.5. I´m sure that everyone has the same issues, please look more deeply, its easily noticeable.
  2. In a couple of weeks... sarcastic mode maybe?
  3. F-14 is more diffucult at least for me. In VR, AV-8B is relatively easy
  4. +1. Looking what´s happens with the sim now, i think it would convenient. I lost all hopes to see perf. improvements looking the history the last year. Vulkan announced since december 2017.... we are now passing 2020 Q2.
  5. +1 I cannot fly any longer IIWW planes due this. Please fix it (as we had fixed in other IIWW sim since many months ago)
  6. Let the team focus in other things please. New physics for AAR only for refueling operation lowering performance even more than now??? we had wake turbulence effects for nasa computers now!!!... better no, thanks. I hope with my 3080ti could reach 45fps in VR... lets dream.
  7. I even would pay for a weather patch and fps optimization... in the original LOMAC the clouds, at least, didn´t disappears with F11 view or after flying 100Km from base. In my opinion LOMAC had better weather implementation. Even remember there was god rays thorought overcast clouds... was very impressive for its time. Much better than now.
  8. Thanks BigNewy. So in a (combat) flight simulator the clouds are a low priority now? perfect, perfect.... Could we know why that decission? I´m sure that for the community the clouds & weather are TOP priorities, much higher that channel map or P-47 (totally unnecessary IMHO). Day after day I see that ED doesn´t listen to anyone. Any ETA now? By the end of 2020 maybe?
  9. Sincerelly, I think that ED doesn´t have programmers with the necessary skills to develop new clouds, appart of performance disaster seen patch after patch (beta or non beta)... the clouds were promised by 2019. 6 month after without any new (I remember Kate saying that were start working in May
  10. Sincerelly, I think that ED doesn´t have programmers with the necessary skills to develop new clouds, appart of performance disaster seen patch after patch (beta or non beta)... the clouds were promised by 2019. 6 month after without any news (I remember Kate saying that were start working in May).
  11. @ED: Fix the damm sim for VR we´re now 5 months without solutions since 2.5.6 disaster (NEAR A HALF YEAR???)... not only in FPS, images not rendered in one EYE, this in pathetic. Stop launching unplayable modules and optimize & put vulkan on play you won´t see any $$$ until fixed.
  12. @ED: Fix the damm sim for VR we´re now 5 months without solutions since 2.5.6 disaster (NEAR A HALF YEAR???)... not only in FPS, images not rendered in one EYE, this in pathetic. Stop launching unplayable modules and optimize & put vulkan on play you won´t see any $$$ until fixed.
  13. It´s not makes sense, don´t understad what improvements ED was working on, I remember Bignewy saying that "performance will increase in the following patches...". Another promise broken (not for Bignewy, I understad he is a representative from ED). Appart of the promise of another one magic VR code to be "merged"... It´s just the same history that happened in the past year with Wags comments saying to expect an increase of "50% more fps"... I´m tired of those magic bullets just watching the reality how performance goes... Please look the other 2WW sim ED: Even that now they improved the graphical engine with deferred shading, performance has increased a lot (even in VR its possible now to mantain 90fps with higher detail settings). With DCS, beta or not beta, patch after patch we´re seeing how performance degrades in VR, just reaching to the point that no PC in earth could even mantain a stable ASW 45 pfs. 5 years ago I bought all modules without doubt. Now, even I don´t consider to buy new channel terrain or P-47... just not for having 15 fps in VR with my high end PC (5.1 Ghz 2080ti 32GB)...better no, thanks.
  14. Nobody noticed significant lower performance in latest 2.5.6.50321? For me, I get 20% less fps than before, with exact the same graphical settings.
  15. This new update bring even more performance to floor. HORRIBLE in VR. Even with other bugs like washed colours. This is the performance improvements & code that were promised not so much time ago?
  16. Hi, the mod doesn´t work with today update. Please it could be possible to enable again? I MISS EXTERNAL CLARITY
  17. There would be patch for today? I remember some commnitacion about F-18 radar would be ready for june3th
  18. ok thanks, passed it (I always ejected)
  19. In 2.5.5. this problem is inexistant, so maybe is not as hard to fix it.
  20. +1 Hope to be resolved for Junte 3th patch
  21. I noticed the same. Appart to not restore in 2.5.6 (now stable...) the performance of 2.5.5, it seems fps degrades from one mission to another, seems to me some sort of memory leak
  22. Hi Bignewy, How is the state now about improvement in VR? It could be possible to know when the code would be ready to be merged? Thanks
  23. Now the Mi-8 Departs, but when returning to home an "invisible" missile hit my plane. Its completely impossible reach home ¿¿¿ what I can do ??? It seems some sort of script (looking the debriefing log..), no really a missile, so what I can do?
  24. WMR reprojection is the better for me, superior to oculus and steamvr. Doesn´t produce artifacts when fighting with other bandit.
×
×
  • Create New...