Bucic

@YoYo , you selfish bugger. The team obviously tries to release the 29 as the first jet with the new Tire Strut Suspension Modelling with the F-5E next in line!

The funny thing is thanks to your post I now have a reference photo of the upper-back part of the landing gear module body

You made a typo in the title so my brain was on high rev with this post I thought it's some million and third English idiom of some sort Tactical Air seems to boast around with a simpit of the 5. It can be seen in one of their posts. I used to be tracking one F-5E operator already and I wonder if it's the same one.

Even with the contemporary setting flying WW2 planes from Marianas just felt more natural compared to Caucasus

Tactical Air Support rubbing it in my face (a finished simpit) https://x.com/TacticalAirUS/status/1701670396934905999

What are you trying to say, man? https://x.com/TacticalAirUS

@Vinc_Vega I appreciate your input but from the first look this doesn't seem to meet my criteria of 'simple' Not to derail the topic here's my thread on the subject

Excellent writeup, Ken! May I ask for a word of advice? I'm just before starting wiring my first panels and to this day I haven't decided what's the best approach to multiply the Arduino inputs, with simplicity, cost effectiveness and DCS-BIOS suitability being the priority variables. From all of my research a manually built board of daisy-chained shift registers is the best solution in my case. What is your take? I find it really odd that out of a dozen of "beginner simpit building guides" the multiplication of Arduino inputs is skimped over. You can't build anything without addressing the issue first!

Good point. With 3 default maps users should be able to uncheck whichever. But it's still less serious than the Heatblur situation for users with no Heatblur modules installed. As for Marianas WW2, a great escape from the old Caucasus and yellow Normandy maps. The Channel map is still my favourite free flight map. Or should I say 'used to be' as I bought Cold War Germany last month BTW, is the close-up tree performance hit bug still active?

Just a thought Haven't the Echo 19 guys already solve it? Take a look https://youtu.be/vHZ62udcFhs?t=140 https://youtu.be/vHZ62udcFhs?t=349 They might have, or they just supress the effects that make the wrong behavior clearly audible in the stock version.

Split Flap Build ASMR - YouTube — https://www.youtube.com/shorts/QYWEgYzy6uA Does anyone have any information on how they are designed internally? Split flap or drum would be my two guesses but how do they fit in such a small space?

In the same document by the AGARD "agency" there's some hard data on wingtip loadout asymetry affecting stability, inertia etc. https://forum.dcs.world/topic/373745-f-5es-aoa-capability-is-too-low-new-document/ Multiple download sources: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=agard+AD-A029+071+stall+spin+PROBLEMS+OF+MILITARY+AIRCRAFT&ia=web Some examples attached.

As I said in the other thread I reviewed my mildoc library and possibly found a new resource document. The original thread is locked https://forum.dcs.world/topic/345813-f-5es-aoa-capability-is-too-low/ so I couldn't add it there. The resource quoted by @nairb121 is F-5E departure warning system algorithm development and validation by J. H. Taylor and A. M. Skow. The one I found is AD-A029 071 STALL/SPIN PROBLEMS OF MILITARY AIRCRAFT - AGARD - ADVISORY GROUP FOR AEROSPACE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. It's almost 250 pages long and contains findings and hard data on both the F-5A and the F-5E. If it wasn't mentioned in the original thread, please merge the info, if you could @NineLine It would be awesome if you could also p r o b e the team about the progress on that issue Multiple download sources: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=agard+AD-A029+071+stall+spin+PROBLEMS+OF+MILITARY+AIRCRAFT&ia=web Some examples attached. #AoA CC: @VPS_Choki @BIGNEWY @Bob1943 @=475FG= Dawger @Kev2go @Gianlc @VPS_SPIT @GGTharos

I checked all of the available cockpit mods and none come close to the remastered apart from indicator glass pieces being better in the old installment. The mesh seems to be the same. Are we forgetting the next gen pilot model again? As for the external model, if you have a problem of that magnitude, I suggest just staring at the exhaust nozzles and landing gear As for 'not just cosmetic' - ED meant 'not just small changes' and you mean 'Mavericks' so...

[Problem] Sketcher: text rendering is "blurry" due to incorrect compositing creating dark fringe around letters · Issue #12394 · FreeCAD/FreeCAD — https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/issues/12394

Memories of a veteran Polish Su-22 pilot - more of Su-22 videos on this channel! Pilot Bojowy SU-22 - Ponad 15000 godzin w powietrzu! Ppłk Bogdan Likus - YouTube — At 9:28 there's a mention of Dionizy Bielanski shot down during an escape attempt 19:40 qualified for Air Force Academy - TS-11 Spark trainer jet 21:10 MiG-15 (1968) 23:00 a preserved Su-22 Veteran Su-22 powerplant mechanic SU 22 Specjalista od silnika Tadeusz Grzybowski Pilot Wojciech Ościk - YouTube —

As for videos it's helpful to enable extended info bar. It can be brought up even in-cockpit. One important thing. The F-5E has been optimized to a specific dogfighting airspeed range. That includes the air intakes and ducts. You can read about it in a published mildoc http://ciar.org/ttk/mbt/air/air.usa.f5.f5e.f-5e_case_study_in_aircraft_design.pdf What I see from the lead is exactly what I'd expect. Not so much in case of the first video.

This or that, a modless track file is required either way. Also, I'd activate TacView recording. It might not have a high polling rate but having the ability to look at graphs is really helpful. Edit: The only other issue this weird I can think off is the RPM force impulse at around 88%

Whenever I test those things I start by comparing "game only" vs "nVcpl only." This makes it easier to troubleshoot.

I think you're the last person that needs convincing to the fact that getting a bug report recognized, accepted and pulled to the official ED tracker is what separates an issue on track to getting resolved from an issue that is guaranteed to never getting fixed. It's like comparing your modest 10 lb bench press progress to an impressive list of past new year resolutions I agree that AoA capability, the pending Tire Strut Suspension Modelling update and radar display update are the biggest bullet points on the hard side of things but the first one has been accepted and the second one is a "we're getting it anyway" sort of thing. I've just finished reviewing my mildoc library and I'm pretty sure I've got one more paper to add to the resources pool pertaining to F-5E AoA capability. As for fruits from higher branches of the tree, indeed, one of the big 3 mentioned above would be a nice juicy bone thrown to the community.

This is interesting! Could you please test the RPM only, eliminating the airspeed variable? I wonder if it isn't tied to the nozzle operation logic instead...

Ah, this again. Months in advance we new it's going to be the same variant. A large number of people fell for nothing but their own uncurbed imagination. The cockpit and the external model alone are worth 15 USD and there are several additional features on top of that. Some not mentioned enough: * next gen pilot body model (on par with the F-16 one?) * cockpit buffetting feedback: component vibrations, audio! * the above is combined with reworked wing flex and added over wing vapor effects * and finally, reignited bug fixing and improvements - in the mere last months we saw more work done on the F-5E than during several years preceeding the Remastered announcement. A good example is the cannon dispersion adjustment.

Isn't it roughly the same ejection seat?

- not a sand map - low USD/PLN exchange rate - "I'd buy it in the future anyway" - 20% off on top - Ugra media releases finished products AND then improves them, as they demonstrated in the past 'if that's not an investment, I don't know what is!'

Chemtrails - Deranged (Live at House Party) - YouTube —