Bucic

@Aronis That ejections controls assembly seems to be metallic. I'm on the fence whether to buy metallic PLA or PET-G. What's your take on this?

Sure. Yeah. Why not. Seriously, the more I gather closeup photos of real aircrafts, the less I'm worried about finishing and details.

Emergency landing Su-22 - vhs

So it has finally happened. I'm sure operationally this was the case for a decade already but this seems to be the last and final days of that Su-17 variant. I think PAF is the last operator globally. Su-22 – pożegnalna sesja air-to-air z udziałem FA-50 -

Year 2025, the Currenthill Asset Packs get integrated into DCS: DCS changelogs seize to be human readable ArmA 3/Reforger players riot in Prague Mission creators employ AI image recognition scripts in Mission Editor to scroll to the desired unit in the unit select drop down lists Disk space occupied by Heatblur modules for people who don't own any Heatblur modules drops to just 20% of the entire DCS installation https://forum.dcs.world/topic/372710-cold-war-sale-currenthill-assets-contention-pvp-servers/

@Red Yeti That looks too good

By featured I meant the pixels were at the center stage

Funny thing is MSAA got featured in the latest Wags's video on DTC, I'm pretty certain.

There's probably a party we've only seen once before

Had it been ATC I would start roasting this thread myself Ah, yes, that's a big one. It doesn't look like Ugra is willing to ditch the 90's RTS game color grading (y-e-l-l-o-w) but it does count as CORE feature in my books for at least two reasons. For one, it's finally not another patch of sand! Two, it DCS finally reaches a part of Central Europe. So yes, that is going to be a big one. I also noticed it uses something akin to normal maps (first seen in Iraqi map?) so it doesn't look like a plastic texture.

Ironing for printing labels-up is absolutely not worth it. Why would anyone go this way if you could just buy a smooth plate for your printer and print everything labels-down?

I think you get it the other way around. My memory serves me quite well and I do appreciate the recent core achievements. It just so happens that very few of them were delivered in Q1 2025 I'm also noticing that updates now seem to have a monthly cadence.

Would it save a player leaving the flaps switch in a wrong position during startup procedure?

So there are upsides to the state of F-5E livery creation problems

Flat 3D printed labels trial. Printed labels down. This is the smaller of the two sizes that are used throughout the cockpit and is 3.5 mm high. Not bad for a 0.4 mm nozzle. Obviously the final print will be done on a smooth printer plate, as opposed to the standard textured one. Now, if only I remembered what I have decided to do to unify the real panel with the crooked panels traced from the in-game cockpit

I might have dropped the ball a bit recently but for a good cause But I'm trying to stay on top of things as far as DCS goes. My impression is simply that vast majority of deliverables in the last ~6 months were module-specific, not Core-specific.

Looking at the entire Q4 2004 and Q1 2025 I must say things got really slow with DCS development. If not for The 5 (personal significance) and The Fog (the true Core) I don't really see much more making into 'this year in review.' To be honest it's completely the opposite from what I thought would happen after the Open Beta/Stable unification ATC and [Suspension], where art thou?

This guy claims the bombing tables don't match. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZfogLnrdwc What doesn't match what I don't remember. In any case you can use the active pause feature to verify and even adjust depression and create your most useful set of corrections.

Nah, just wanted to make sure the devs are aware of it. Most importantly to verify what is actually in the winget repository. As for misidentification, I'm sure ED is aware that in DCS is still identified by some programs, like nVidia's software components, as DCS Black Shark.

Just FYI, the windows package manager winget reports wrong installed DCS version. I've got 2.9+ installed. It sees 2.5. I'm not going to check what happens if I proceed with updating all available packages through winget on my system but maybe it's worth looking into: Name Id Version Available Source ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DCS World OpenBeta EagleDynamics.DCSWorldOpenBeta 2.5 2.9 winget Just in case I added winget pin add EagleDynamics.DCSWorldOpenBeta to exclude it from updating when I use winget upgrade --all.

In-flight only. He obviously bounces on the ground but I found the in-flight animations much more interesting. Unfortunatelly the recording comes from before the LERX vapor update.

May I ask what's the deal with the shark nose and pointy nose AI variants? Both are E-3 but as separate unit types within DCS with separate set of liveries?

Thanks! The smaller "tabs" on the glitching doors also behave in a weird way. Even if the angles are correct for their animation the animation itself is far too abrupt. I'm kind of glad to see this happening as it seems the dev team is messing with the landing gear which obviously means the F-5E is poised to get the new suspension and tire modeling very soon

That's because the video I linked shows a DCS build before the animation broke Please hold on. I'm going to supplement the bug report properly in the evening. In short the MLG doors attached to MLG struts glitch out (literally outward) at one point in the animation.

There's something wrong with the animations. The doors glitch out outboard at some point. I'm going to provide a track in the evening. I only have the release Remastered recording at hand for now which shows the doors operating correctly.