sorcer3r

IMO without engine overheat it is just not a real Huey simulation and this is a big issue for a Huey simulation. ;) DCS is not famous for its performance, AI, campaigns etc. but for its system fidelity. So I would expect that at least this part is finished in a module before I start working on my 5th module... :helpsmilie:

Are you sure that engine overheat for the Huey has to be implemented by ED first?

Need still track files for this ship desync issue? Seems that if a client joins later than other clients he will see different position/movement (or no movement) of ships.

1. late 20th. 2. modern. 3. cold war. More skills than just dogfight skills required. ;)

After a successful flight.... I don't really know what happened but it was fun :D

sounds not bad :) how many ground units do you have in one session on the server?

Glaube nicht, dass bei Kampagnenmissionen vorgesehen ist, das man auf der Homebase nochmal nachlädt und wieder ins Zielgebiet fliegt. Das wäre ja dann wieder eine neue Mission und IMO kein gute Missionsdesign.

Da ist was dran. Bin vielleicht 1-2x mit der F16 alleine geflogen. Sonst immer mit mindestens einem Kollegen. Wenn ich allerdings im Huey fliege, hab ich aber auch gern mal nen 2. Heli um mich rum, die KI im Heli noch nich so viel auf dem Kasten hat ;) (kommt natürlich auf die Missi an).

There are many reasons why the MP community has become smaller in recent years. Hopefully this will change some day.

Markpoints :)

I agree. It is obvious that there is a lack of modern equipped planes / helicopters in DCS. But I would not blame any 3rd party devs for it. Especially if they are new to DCS. On the other hand it is somehow disappointing when they continue with WW2 or other museum era modules after their first modules are almost finished. This could undermine the argument that their first modules are there to learn DCS and to get ready to make more modern/complex aircraft. Maybe it is just too hard to make modern stuff in DCS. Just see that Belsimtek could only add a radar altimeter and a flare dispenser. (Missile warning system, RWR and GPS would need years of developement?) Anyway we can say what we want but I'm afraid it will take a long time until we see something modern again.

Sowohl im TGP also auch im TAD markiert ein kleines grünes Kreuz freundliche Bodeneinheiten, die mit Datalink ausgerüstet sind. Hm. Kommt darauf an, was du unter Martkieren verstehst. Mit Markpoints erstellt du nur dort Wegpunkte wo sich z.B. dein SOI hinschaut.

Achso. Naja, da es viel mit KI-Geschichten zu tun hat, würde ich mal auf Bugs tippen. ;)

That's Isegrim. Everything what has two or more MFDs is kind of extraterrestrial for him. :D Just joking, Ise ;)

da du bei uns ja ab und an im TS bist, können wir da uns gern mal was anschaun im editor. Zum schreiben wär das etwas viel bei den temperaturen ;)

Google kann das. 1-2 mal im Jahr stöber ich auch das russische Forum durch. ;)

Wenn ne A10 weiß, wo sich gerade ein feindlicher Heli befindet, kann auch ein Heli wissen, wo sich gerade eine A10 befindet. ;)

"later update" :D

...only if they are transparent ;)

1. Uh-1h (although not finished) Upcoming modules? Hm. AH-64, UH-60, Mi-24(p?), AH-1F. Ok these aren't upcoming modules. ;) Future of DCS does not look so bright... for me.

TS is not a part / feature of the sim. Ok for sure you could ban people for not using additional software. Not sure if this would be good but maybe it could work?

This! Yes, that's kind of an advantage that falcon MP filters out the non-"hardcore" pilots. But IVC for DCS would be still a gamechanger. If a pilot will join your public server but does not communicate via IVC admins could warn him and finally ban him from the server. Then most people would use IVC and at the end there is a better "atmosphere" in MP.

Would be awesome!. But a modern equipped DCS module (except the A10)... I want to believe. :pilotfly:

"only" this would be enough. :)

btw will e.g. the A10C RWR recognise the Mig21 Radar properly?