sorcer3r

... was soweit ich weiß dann ja dem realen Flugverhalten nahe kommen würde.

:)

Is it possible that the FM behaves a little bit different in 2.1 (roll axis) ?

Any news on dedicated server for 2.5? Server hosts paying for maps (twice) and if all maps are included in one dcs version server hosts will be very limited in hosting dcs instances...

In MP combat missions I have never seen a Gazelle pilot do crazy unrealistic stuff. Everyone flies the gazelle more or less realistic. What I see very often in MP is that Huey pilots flying way beyond the engine overheat limits (full speed at full loadout etc...). Huey is long time out of beta and still has is issues while Gazelle has multicrew and is still WIP. At least patience is needed in this forum section here. ;)

I can just say (again) that from time to time a german military helicopter pilot flies with us in dcs. He owns all dcs helo modules and still the gazelle is currently is favorite module. He hasn't tested the "extremes" of the FM if he has time he flies missions with us and he is flying like he would fly in RL (more or less ;) but it is awesome to fly with him because you see that he knows how to fly in a combat area and you can learn a lot just following him... ) Anyways ;) is the FM perfect? No it is not but IMO it is not so bad that it deserves this harsh critic. ps: currently I only fly the gazelle in dcs. I stopped flying the huey because for me the missing engine overheat is a showstopper compared to the flaws of the gazelle FM.

most wanted asset? -> dedicated serve app. server hosts have to pay for nevada, normandy.. and now assets... not bad

Absolut. Und hätte nichts dagegen die kiste mal in dcs zu fliegen. :thumbup:

"etwas mehr Leistung" ist etwas untertrieben, würde ich ma sagen. ;)

CH53 +1 But also Puma and black Hawk would be big enough for me. ;)

Die Gazelle hat auch ein 2 Mann Pit und funktioniert wunderbar in DCS. Wemm dann noch an Multicrew weiter gebastelt wird, sollte das gar kein Problem mehr sein. ;)

our server is down because currently 2.0 is not stable enough in MP....

It would be really nice if there were AI awacs in the K.O. mission. Then also M2000C pilots which do not want to use this "arcade IFF" have something to work with...;)

In MP it seems if you increase or reduce your fuel it doesnt affect your wheight. e.g.: if you set 100% fuel in mission editor and reduce it on the farp to 20% it seems still to be the weight of 100% already known issue or do you need a track file ?

I know a current EC-135 pilot who bought the Gazelle module 1-2 weeks ago. Now it is his favourite DCS helicopter. Maybe the FM isn't 100% perfect but it could be closer to the real thing than you thought.

*bump* any news? anyone still cares about the mission editor ? oO

Good news about the new tree system. Hopefully. Is it also planned that with 2.5 ( or already before) all the triggers of the mission editor will work...?

Is it working in 1.5.4 ? This bug is definitely a PITA for mission building...

The current FM update is a step in the right direction but you are right there is still room for improvement. Your track file shows very well that e.g. tail rotor roll effect is missing.

Is it fixed in 1.5.4?

Does this also include the tail rotor roll effect?

I really like the current FM updates. :thumbup: But the tail rotor roll effect seems still missing. Is it already WIP or planned to simulate?

Some years ago I was told when work on DCS world 1.0 is done things will improve... but yeah.. maybe this time. ;)

Question about DCS development and communtiy "participation" is an old one. ED has its own priorities and my lesson was lower your expectations.... drastically. ;) +1 Unfortunately DCS open beta releases are not as successful as I was hoping before. For example broken triggers in final releases are in my opinion a no-go.