McBlemmen

You'll get your rio if you get to the ship and if you don't ,give me a call and i'll fly with you.

I was just about to say this. I think (i'm not sure , its been a long time since i've flown in wet weather) that there are some visual effects on the canopy , but definately not enough. Here's hoping edge will improve both wet canopy's and wet runways :) Right now you can barely tell its raining. Hope it will someday look like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yb1W4O_IWZI (first 30ish seconds)

yes

May i redirect you to cobra's signature.

Present age but anything from vietnam and onward will do :)

Only if it has AFM.

They won't , thats why nobody has tried to make a DCS truck sim. Please explain to me how this would be more realistic then ETS 2? Have you SEEN the ground textures and building placement in DCS? Its not about the cockpit its about the world. DCS looks like shit on the ground , and even with EDGE it still wouldn't be good at all compared to ETS. A fancy cockpit alone doesnt make it a good truck sim. And ETS's cockpits look fine. The(edit : there are other simplified things i suppose) only thing thats unrealistic in ETS is the distances , but who wants to drive for 24 hours or however long a delivery would take in real life , anyway? I can't really tell if you're joking or not... get real please. Next up you're gonna ask for a metro simulator within DCS , DCS isnt some universal engine in wich all future simulators should run.

I fly the SU33 alot in singleplayer but not in multiplayer becouse i suck at air to air, and whenever i find a su33 slot on a server its a CAP flight and not a ground strike flight :(

Happy new year guys, good luck with your next project. Please god let it be an F14 <3

pass, euro truck simulator is tons of fun , this would suck.

I agree with Mower. I think DCS should focus on modern day aircraft since the other eras are mostly covered by other sims. But if a third party dev comes along and wants to start making biplanes who am i to say they can't? But i would not buy it , just like i'm not buying any DCS WW2 aircraft.

Oh okay sorry i misunderstood :)

Why would they make so many carriers when we only have 1 right now? 1 time-appropriate carrier is enough imo.

Thumper clearly didn't

OR! It means they are completely ready to go but just have to do one last little thing. I'm pretty sure that's it. YYYup. We'll be flying the F18 tomorrow.

On its own , no. But alongside other modules , definately. Being able to correct AI mistakes on the ground and direct other flights to targets is a must -have

If it means more carrier ops , sign me up!!!

If its an F14 its gonna be fun to play with AIM 54, however with DCS's infamous missile behavior i doubt many would actually use it in A2A combat( ie. : against anyone who's actively fighting back)

I'm not really paying attention to this project becouse i don't want to get excited long before release becouse that sucks , but these screenshots look stunning

EW.... Early warning? Early warning radar? Well that confirms it , its an A-6 with SEAD missiles.

Lol , that second picture needs to be entered in the screenshot contest or something , that's hilarious

I always put the HOF on 97s and 105s on the minimum (i belive its 300 but its been a while so i could be wrong) otherwise i cant hit shit with them , especially with wind conditions mixed in. They just drop for waaaay too long on the medium-high HOF settings

I'm still pretty sure it's an F-14 , but after the F-14 (or during , maybe from another dev group) it would be cool to see an F-5... or should i say "mig 28" to go head to head with the F-14 x)

A playable sniper in DCS would add almost nothing to the game imo. What i would love to see is the ability to send A10s datalink targets like AI jtac's

Nah , i personally don't think it would be a good use of development time. Not for a DCS : AC130 anyway. An AI one i could get behind , though.