pepin1234

I can confirm my graphic drivers are not up to date. I saw few days ago the new drivers just skipped for later.

I don’t use mod. Not a single one. I will upload my log crash tomorrow.

I can’t get in in any Syria map server. DCS just crash after get in server.

The Flanker 2.5 is a Russian independent product. The current DCS is a western product with Russia programmers

Can I use it in Multiplayer server with anti cheating?

For 16 year long.... Come on GGTharos we also have the right to discuss some issues in harmony. The superiority facts and all your antagonist behavior for all Russian in Russian thread is nonsense in a forum with a lot of diversity. Just try it better

@GGTharos if you don’t mind leave this thread clean of personal discussion. I mean at least help the thread with something positive for the question we debate here. All your superiority facts are nonsense. I am sure you can help community with something different than be pissing on the Russian missiles thread continually for 15 years long. A good ice cream, beer, a night club. They are really good stuff can help.

Yes you’re right. Something that make me worry is the R-27ET with 40% less flight performance than his brother R-27ER. When you read official description of both missile you will see about a different of ~5% more in range in favor ER version. Let’s add another 15% less for ET because the guidance is different. That is a total about 20% less range. What we are getting in a combat starting launches from 35km is about 40% less energy in range for ET. The difference is too big. Every weakness you find in description for everything you will find in game twice. And then we must see people coming here telling something is a fact en bla bla bla.

Do you plan add more air bases? I see Deir ez-Zur have the radio station but nothing there.

nop :(

Here some interesting pictures about what have been change in comparison with the previous DCS update. Same track, same situation with different results. I cant tell right now how exactly performs R-27 in comparison because AI did a different maneuver after update and that impact a lot the final result. So I want to share with you this detail. The 360 turns on counter attack is a move made by humans. In this case we got AI doing a second move after runaway. So good by ED with this AI regard. first picture all remain almost the same. At same time frame. Second picture. AI try a Notch move instead keep pushing. See 90 degrees. Same time frame. Here the Hits doesn't happen and AI F-18 go in 360 to after that come back for next attack. Same time frame

Really need this to put somewhere on map in mission editor. I am worry about the open desert and navigation for lower flight.

Mig-21 also use RSBN. I don’t understand why we dont have mobile station. There are many situations we will need an extra station at specific area.

Please read again my previous post. I did a test with same track and Aim-120 performed the same after update. Not the same for R-27. Not a single R-27 hit. So I will keep doing some test. So basically what I wanted to tell you is not going well after all. Not for R-27R, R-27T keep very bad as before. But..but... I need to confirm they also improved the F-18 behave to a more realistic combat profile. Such I am ok about. I can adapt myself for that AI. I have some pictures about that.

What such a powerful person you are that you request your personal desire to a DCS producer. You request weakness for R-27 in chaff condition but you don't request ECM implementation for screw Aim-120. And it is exactly what we got. :doh: After all your opinion is that ''that is good''

after today update the track show worst result. all missiles missed. R-27ER seem to go even more to chaff CM. Also seem they tuned the way F-18 behave doing 360 turns and weird things. Seem They didn't improve anything as announced. as track show a downgraded R-27 performance in general. remarkable on this situation Aim-120 show the same result as expected but R-27 much worst. see track: R-27ET on the face-8.trk

Iraq?

With Override you have a solid lock with onboard sensors and head seeker is pointing the locked target but without a solid IR signature. That's why is my question about the 5sec straight flight to after that waste of energy go for the homing head position flight. see my last track. what is wrong with that? 1- during that first 5sec straight flight the target is moving out from the head seeker angle trajectory. 2- add extra turn, waste of energy. PS: to replicate that. make a launch with 45 degrees from target.

You didn't understand at all. make a research in the forum or ask in a better manner.

Will be a mobile station?

You’re right.

I don’t use mod. Anyway Thanks for your help. Some people out there will be more than happy with this mod.

I will not spend almost $40 for only one model without crew animation I want to own to use It with Su-33. So we must see how Su-33 don’t get a Superwhatever package even when we want similar stuff for Su-33 followers. With this situation I have two options. Keep with old model or go pay for something I don’t use to get a single aircraft carrier without crew animation and whatever they want to put on this supposed module. With this situation they only keep working for a particular customer profile.

I always got this question: why there are not open source community projects?

WWII only.