pepin1234

I have exclamation marks on some key entries in control setup. what that mean?

In case they end in a Mig-29A. It is still a dangerous machine. If you set two ER and doing override to that missile even when the radar computing is not for that longer range missile, you still have the real option to calculate manually the launch. Hey... you gonna kill the best fighters with the help of EWR or AWACS for real. (Without counting the on steroids Aim-54...) Now... without ECM is a really downside. But as long ED keep the current kindergarten ECM level, then the 29 9.12 is still on fight. IRL Belorussian and Russians made a really interesting ECM pod rail for 9.12 but I don’t expect this add in DCS.

this mod is amazing. never see this complexity of work in a mod in DCS so this is top notch job

thanks for your advice buddy. I just need the grip in combination with warthog base.

Is some of you guys have this combination tested, can you please share your experience. I know the new bases are really rock solid hardware but hey I want keep my TM Warthog for a while more so I just looking for the grip stick for now. 1- Compatibilities with TM Warthog base? 2- What will not work with this mod? 3- TARGET Software compatibility? 3- I need adapter?

the ironic part of this Mi-24P aggressor units in USA use the RWR SPO-15 configuration. F-16, Mirage, F-18 at some point have some incompatible payload for the version. But we get what we get in RU side without a solid reason even when export versions for Mi-24P were sold with SPO-15 as picture show in this aggressor Hind:

happen the same with Mig-29 in some different rate and speed. You do the same with F-15 and like a boss happen nothing to his wings. Is obvious there is programing into this, not a bug at all.

Did you notice the new R-73L in Encyclopedia?

video is not available

is obvious they want to make some Syria operation from now days. At this point they should make a similar job for a mixed Syrian/Iranian soldier or Israeli new model. At least they are working on that. I expect a little bit beyond a 3D model only. the Syria map now days war is mostly infantry.

maybe is a new ammunition for new generation Mi-35. We gonna get Mi-24 from 80s. just my guess.

today happen that. R-73 was about 850kmh at the moment of this miss and only 8m without detonation. There is a reason for R-73 doesn't detonate when speed get bellow 900kmh? Seem a kind of code for missiles when get lower speed to tend to fail detonation.

about 3D models From the last newsletter 3D Unit Modelling (digitalcombatsimulator.com) They are talking about crew, but they are showing a paratrooper instead. they are planning paratroopers implementation? That sound really cool and honestly they are needed. I cant accept a battlefield without infantry. they are terrifying in real life. we are not getting that in our game. Mission designers just don't add infantries and take care of 3D models is good news. I would like they tell us more about what is next, or what is planned to try give a new life to infantries? I am not asking for a first person simulator, just thinking in a practical implementation into our Sim without kill game performance and add enjoyability with real life simulation in this regard.

if this mod have a new 3D cockpit that gonna be really good news. Red side need a bomber with afterburner.

When is the release date for the Su-17? Sorry I can’t wait to tell that...

Seriously... I was expecting to test the S-200 today as I was more than 2 years without touching the mission editor, ...and Bump!!! I don't find S-200 in the editor. They add it to a specific country?? or they just didn't implemented yet the S-200 announced since more than 3 - 4 years??

the President-S is out right?

Mi-8 for navigation and Ka-50 for unguided weapons (Mi-8 behave worse than Mi-24 with unguided weapons, need some correctios not applied in Mi-24)

update please?

why we got that extra pylon station? Was not there before.

was a question... not a request.

When I go to payload in Mig-31 mission editor, I see an extra external pylon, the one is used for R-73 and also R-77 APU rail. As that is in the standalone version, There is an official plan for R-73 in near future? I know real life it is a payload but never see that before in DCS. Primorye Gebiet, Russland. 25 Okt, 2018. PRIMORYE GEBIET, Russland - Oktober 25, 2018: Ein Vympel R-73 Luft-Luft-Rakete auf einer Mikoyan MiG-31 BM interceptor Flugzeug vor einem Flug am Tsentralnaya Uglovaya Flugplatz. Juri Smityuk/TASS Credit: ITAR-TASS News Agentur/Alamy leben Nachrichten Stockfotografie - Alamy

seriously... you make question at the same time your last posts show you argue with people with more knowledge. Why not try PlayStation 5 games and leave respectful people alone with their stuffs...?

All your last post in this thread are to attack people in how they look this situation. Keep going you are almost creating your own dictatorship. The truth against the unfair must be judged. And the truth is that a simple RWR that was in real life in export versions, developers don’t want to add this system to the Mi-24. if F-14 kill in low altitude and in mountains with Aim-54 and nobody care, Mirage 2000 have systems never had, F-16 have payloads never had and nobody care in ED (including YOU, I don’t see you asking for change for that but bothering people when ask for real RWR for a Russian module) let me guess...? You use more often the fake hardware allowed in this game and when the opposite side want to talk about real systems from real life you come out with "let’s learn use what developers gave to us" keep going you almost get a contract from ED.

Don't exaggerate... we are talking about a RWR it is not the best of the best but work and export versions have it and is real. We are not making any difference with this RWR other than have more Situation awareness and is not for kill others but for defense.