Jump to content

Darkwolf

Members
  • Posts

    1595
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Darkwolf

  1. En fait y a un script express dans l'éditeur maintenant. Si t'as un hélico de transport tu peut faire une manip dans l'éditeur mais je me rapelle plus le nom de la commande.
  2. NOT FAIR AT ALL :P I did won a couple of dogfights with the Huey.. ... Against an A10-C flew by a friend. The Huey can fire gatling in a 270° radius. Not the others. It has superior manoeuvrability and is PITA to destroy. It's a damn B17 with a rotor. That is not fair at all....
  3. Not impressed unless serious change to ground warfare. [i'm thinking that because everytime i'm thinking ED will mess, they prove me wrong :P ]
  4. /me dream of combat mission game mechanics in DCS.....
  5. Availability is quite random. Last year they were a couple of month were it was depleted everywhere in France/Belgium/Netherlands. And we got quite nice shops around (simw and aviationmegastore)
  6. They really deserved the Cup. They were the only team with great players, and great teamplay. Other teams had either Teamplay, either great player, but not both at the same time. Yet - I still wonder how brazil got so far in the cup. :P
  7. Yup damage model is wrong : i fall whatever caliber is fired at me. 12.7mm, 27mm, 9mm.... even when i m not fired at, i fall from the sky. Er......wait...could it be my lack of skill ? :P
  8. I am all wet now :P
  9. In my opinion, the key element that DCS miss is a Armed Assault style GUI integration for mission designer. In that game, anyone with some scripting knowledge can create an in-game GUI which can be used for various things. This would unlock a lot of things editor-wise
  10. Well, both are great simulators with their pros and cons - You may want to stay on that note and don't compare too much - moderators never sleeps :P
  11. Rain is useless anyway : we don't have proper rain effect that affect visibility in DCS yet. Just the background rain/snow effect that doesn't change gameplay at all.
  12. You must see CA as a strategic interface within DCS with integrated JTAC capability. consider driving stuff around is just an option and not the main "feature" of the product. I appreciate CA this way. Quite frankly, the control system just sucks. FCS is a welcome addition but stays ages behind what would qualify as decent. They is no IR sight. They is no decent ground troops system (imho - should really inspirate from Combat Mission, versus having infantry as single entity).... But keeping in mind this is more a strategic system than a vehicle simulation make the pain less harder :)
  13. Those are two great sticks. I used to have a G940, then moved to the Warthog. I do miss the Force Feedback Effect. However, when i fly with my cats on my knees, it replace it perfectly :) - My friend who purchased the G940 from me, had reliability issue with it afterward. I would suggest the Warthog over the G940. The stick don't move, but the stick full metal. It's something when you have it in the hand. You can fly the warthog with the G940, but not as smoothly than the warthog. It is also possible to put it easily between your leg, either by extending the stick, or extending the grip base. (I used PVC pipe with quick disconnect system). Either way you choose, you'll have good time.
  14. Well, nothing prevented them to jump in and say "sorry fellas, we have not much to say". Some people will always feel the need to advocate things/people they don't understand anything about. Simple fact is : It is Thursday, they did not communicated. It is not a matter of being entitled to claim an update, it is a matter of a company not holding its word. It is damaging them, little part by little part. That is not surprising but it's sad, because i'm following their facebook page and they are very responsive and involved in FSX community (for example, helping other company with 3d models). From what i saw/heard about them, they are great folks and they have the potential of doing great things around.
  15. Well they can wait for them now. US govt isn't fast with delivery.
  16. Remember that it is not only a matter of quality, but a matter of quantity too. You can do battle against F15/F16 too, just add more Migs in the air. :) In MP, the few first day we will have massive fire all around the airport due to missed take-off/landing. After a few days, everyone will be flying the Mig21, so only a few (uninterrested-by-mig21) F15 drivers against them, So they'll be a LOT of burning F15. After a few time, it will even a little more and mig 21 will fall from the sky like flies.
  17. Hi guyz - Time for an eventual completely stupid question. It is in my understanding that Flamming cliffs 3 and the standalone F15C are completely the same. however i've come accross a few discution were it wasn't completely clear and suggesting stand alone version had some differences. Are both the same of not ?
  18. Everyone is with you. Don't get mad after all those dude asking for release. When you do something such beautiful and highly expected, it is normal that people goes crazy. This is not against you - it's more like ... santa claus effect. They can't wait to play. Kudos for the work you and the team did, i really hope the ressource and time investment will pay out well and that leatherneck will become a productive and successful developer. :)
  19. Must not be viable, US would not work on aim9 capable of 180° after firing.
  20. Je ne suis pas sur mais il me semble que c'est le switch qui délimite le max RPM.
  21. AMD R-something-i-don't-recall.
  22. EVEN GRUMPY CAT IS HAPPY
  23. If ED works the core - people will complain that modules aren't coming fast enough - If ED works module - people will complain that core isn't stable. :)
×
×
  • Create New...