Jump to content

Madone

Members
  • Posts

    666
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Madone

  1. ok content que ça marche pour toi! :)
  2. Pour moi, ça ressemble à un problème de configuration ou de détection. Vérifie que rien n'interfère et que la sensibilité est correcte.
  3. I think the Thrustmaster T.FLIGHT X HOTAS could be pretty good for you, I personally tweaked mine a bit and it works like a charm! You can detach the controls, and with the use of a modifier (to trim), I have all the buttons I need. I bought it 36€ on Amazon so you can probably found it for 50$. As said above, a HOTAS is the way to go with the A10.
  4. AFAIK Russians and China are both huge countries with a lot of population so potentially a lot of money... Your statement is quiet wrong, I could set it in the other way and that would go full circle...
  5. Yes but he said it was working correctly before the update so I guess he didn't changed his settings. As said above try to be careful in the graphic settings, there are pointless things, for me, mirrors, tree view distance and bushes have a big impact.
  6. Well you'll get used to frequent updates, e.g Steam can make you download 10 updates in a day... lol. So DCS is really far from being an annoying bandwidth eater!
  7. Hi, you should try repairing the game maybe.
  8. That's a difference between the Mirage 2000 and the Rafale. The Rafale is more cost effective simply because it requires less engineers and less "stuff", the availability is also increased because they changed their methods. The Rafale is probably more expensive than a Mirage but once operationnal, the maintenance is easily done. Looking at the present situation is rather a good thing...
  9. The Rafale is a good aircraft, it's cheap and quick to maintain, modern avionics... but we also have some incredible pilots, as the Rafale is pretty expensive to buy, there's less slots and trust me, the recruits fight like dogs to get their arse in one...
  10. I think he has no hope in the "everything is subject to change" but of course that's wrong..
  11. I agree with that, Combined Arms has a good concept, but I think peoples not really interested in JTAC'ing will miss some eye candy. I personally prefer to be JTAC than flying then I prefer to play the famous Arma 2 with it's mod which IMHO allows more realism for a JTAC role (though the realism can depend of the server you play on). Otherwise I don't think you'll regret CA, it's pretty good, and it will of course get better in the future...
  12. :lol: Ammunition depots are a common problem... 2 GBU-10 is enough, at least IRL that should be, last time I took out that kind of target, I aimed the 2 bombs at each side of the depot. But aiming in the middle should work. Do you have a track file of that?
  13. I had a friend flying as civilian but he stopped because it was really annoying and difficult to navigate with altitudes and too expensive. But I think that's like everything, there's pro & cons, but I don't think the first flights can't bore you, but if you fly at the same place all the time it can get pretty boring
  14. T'as raison je viens de le découvrir, c'est sous le nom de USA UN :doh:
  15. Sympa les skins, est ce qu'il y en aura pour le UH-1?
  16. Hi, no it's not really strange, I experienced the same with my CPU, the fact is that I can only increase the bus frequency on my i3 so if I go too high, the CPU fails and create errors which apparently leads to a system crash or data loss decreasing the performance, that's what I've been told and it seems a possible explanation. :( Maybe it's the something similar for you?
  17. It's not, DCS already used 4GB on my system, same for Planetside 2, though I've to say that I run some monitoring softwares in the background but it's not a big deal. Encoding videos can use up to 8GB of RAM as well but it depends the software you're using.
  18. Thanks I find a new game to party :thumbup:
  19. Then they must be very surprised when watching a firework lol
  20. De rien, n'hésite pas si tu as d'autres questions!
  21. Thanks for the laugh dude, I like the reverse tip! XD
  22. Bonjour Dark Angel et bienvenue dans DCS! C'est très simple, "heading 36" représente l'azimut vers la piste d'atterrissage, le "for 2" donne la distance en nautiques. Donc tu te trouves à environ 2 nautiques de la piste. C'est la même chose quand tu repères une cible (du moins c'est ce que l'IA dira en anglais) à partir de références diverses (bullseye, avion...). Il y a un joli pavé page 650 du manuel sur la communication ATC. J'espère avoir aidé, cordialement :)
  23. Ok MegOhm, I'll just come back on the OP, I personally let Catalyst as it is, I didn't make any profile. I did some profiles for FC 2 which had no AA but DCS World as already good ingame settings so I don't feel the need to override them. I think it's always better to use the features developped for the game.
  24. I personally don't know any game using 6 cores, DCS uses 2 cores as said above, but hey look in the future, a nice quadcore will do the job on other games such as Arma or Cliffs of Dover maybe and DCS will probably evolve to use 4 cores. Looking at the prices, I don't see the point for a 6 cores, unless you do some 3D modeling for example.
  25. This processor is quiet amazing indeed, but the problem is that DCS will use only 2 cores. I guess he has a good overclocking maybe? but seriously, DCS maxed out on a 52"... that's demanding :D And you're welcome Garth!
×
×
  • Create New...