I never said such a thing. What I did say or actually implied was that at those ranges the missile shouldn't have run out of energy. That's why I fired at close range instead of 25 NM expecting a kill.
We were both over the ocean. Not many places to hide. Even so the land near the shore was pretty flat for quite a ways.
In that case I learned something.
Let's be fair here. Even if I didn't turn around I wouldn't have seen what happened anyway. I might have been able to visually track his plane at max zoom but I'm not going to see the missiles. As for radar tracking, I had him locked at all times until radar gimbals at which point he was still coming at me, a good deal after the first missile. Cranked but certainly not in a notch. The first missile should have hit by then.
Firing en mass didn't help anyway as all missed. Of course I don't expect range or agility to increase, I was hoping at least one would track.
I get that it's fair. It's just as bad for the Russian birds too. I've argued that its bad for both many times on these forums. And I did say I'm not a great virtual pilot but tactics or not, 6 missiles shouldn't have missed from that kind of shot. Nowhere to run or hide.
And to add, I don't expect to be a better pilot with improved missiles. That's not what I'm saying. I would like to score some hits more often though. Especially in my situation that I had last night. With every advantage like that, there shouldn't have been 6 misses.