AKULA_OPTIMUS

See, what did I told you?:D When ED estimates a time frame, its ALWAYS left to the very last day of that time frame. Anyway, thanks Wags for the update:thumbup:

Yes, please, because there is nothing I hope more than to be wrong about this:D

We wont get 2.5 until the end of January, just accept it, it would be easier :p

So we can expect it at the very end of January:music_whistling:, after two years waitting, I guess thats not too much hehe. It looks awesome, and with the new lighting and shadows even the bombs or rockets will look stunning.

:thumbup::thumbup:Things like this are much appreciated!!

I´m happy with any kind of aircraft as long they are good quality, more to choose from :D

Clear what? That he tested the harrier in both versions and it works? Ok, but that doens´t tell you anything about the release date of each version, so its not clear at all. The module will be released in "X" versions of the game, "X" date for version "X", and "X" date for version "X", is as easy as that, I don´t understand why they dont say things this way, Exactly, thats why things must be said as clear as possible, no mistery or mistake.

All of this only shows the lack of caring and comunication between ED and the comunity, it has always been like that. If not, I dont´t understand how is possible that people don´t even know in what versions the product they pursached will work. Wait and see is not a serious nor professional way to answer to the people that had already spend their money.

Is nowhere that big, and forget about Qatar or Barein:(

And most of it water probably:(

Here are some countries with an area similar to 90.000 sq miles to help compare:music_whistling: Guinea 94,926 square miles United Kingdom 93,638 square miles Uganda 93,072 square miles Ghana 92,098 square miles Laos 91,400 square miles Guyana 83,000 square miles Belarus 80,153 square miles

I don´t know, but seeing this videos and watching how easy this people take off and land this airplane with almost no trainning, worries me about the realism of the flight model, I´m the only one???:(

Inflation from where? I´m pretty sure most of the customers aren´t from the USA, and ED is a russian company so, what inlation are you talking about? USA, Russia,the global one.... venezuelan? :music_whistling:

You mean unfinished products and pre-pursache things aren´t for me, because there is a lot of other modules that are perfectly fine, with lots of support and superb quality, those are the ones I buy, also you have many sales during the year when you can buy them for a very reasonable price, of course is the game for me, this Harrier module (for now) is not.

Looks really nice, but first they have to finish the M2000 before I buy anything else from RAZBAM, I will not preorder a product that could be finished in 2019. And that last change in price... I´ll wait for a sale:D

This:D

The political reason is just plain stupid, by that reasoning, we wouldn´t be able to fly sims in any part of the world in conflict.

Still, to have the ones we had is more realistic than dont have any at all like right now.

Looks awesome.

I don´t understand, why it is a crusade? And how people can think they are unrealistic? You only have to watch some real life videos to see the scraches all over the canopy on real aircraft. Some examples: Canopy scratches More canopy scratches Aaaand at min 2:15....Canopy scratches!!!

In wich way they where unrealistic? Real aircraft have them, I would like to have them back, at least as an optional featurette, they added a lot of realism, now its like there is no glass between you and the exterior.

Yep, I have the same issue.

Looks really good!!

Even easier, place then as static objects in the editor.

The problem is when will that happen, can be in 2 or 3 months or a year and a half, my advice is to keep the 1.5, since Nevada can become "boring" very soon, you can´t do realistic combat missions there. So until there is more info about 2.5 and when it will be ready, I would´t remove the 1.5 for now. :thumbup: