Jump to content

fragal

ED Closed Beta Testers Team
  • Posts

    495
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by fragal

  1. Any new Vids, screens or updates planned soon ?
  2. Thank you U-boats for confirming :)
  3. Funny thing is razbam said they had a date earlier today on their discord then a few hours later said yeah it’s Friday. hb said they had a date nearly a week ago and we’re still waiting.....why so hard just tell us and end this overhyped speculation saga...
  4. Be interesting to find out if we're getting the RD-93 or the WS-13 powerplant. RD93 - slower WS13 - Faster now in full production to replace the RD93's
  5. ^^
  6. Standby, to Standby - Standard HB status update whole things turned into a meme
  7. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvXXUrGCF3wV3bbZ6pFQ00g/community case in point - this is a tad annoying
  8. I want fast can't wait to get my hands on it :D
  9. No probs. @aeriaGloria not sure to be honest https://thaimilitaryandasianregion.wordpress.com/2015/10/23/jf-17-thunder-fighter-or-cac-fc-1-xiaolong-jets/ this is a fantastic read through on the JF17 though it seems to be a bit of a mixture of Block 1 and II info but you should come away with a general idea of what to expect.
  10. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3742211&postcount=247
  11. Because it's not on the real one it's a -5 thing not a 2000C
  12. Hey GG, been a while hope you've been keeping well ? @borchi No your right i'm not an expert but i have a fairly good general understanding of missile physics though and from your mention of the motor it's the mistral 2 we have ? I would maybe suggest in that case you do try and make that known in game along with some appropriate model updates though unfortunately i still fail to see how the first stage ejection motor is able to power when it separates from the missile maybe 15ft from the launcher is enough to help boost that missile up 17500k feet and it still going 1400knots also will just leave this here as well because i still feel skeptical that the missile can do it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5_-hzqBGHI
  13. But it literally is BS and from this thread i'm not the only one who thinks that....so i guess lets replace all land based shorad with mistrals and every a2a weapon as it's clearly superior to everything else it outperforms 90% of every other short range missile in game. Including SA15's. That's a powerful little motor with it's 2 second burn time.
  14. Sorry but since when does a stinger or Igla happily fly up to 17500ft still going 1200knots it's literally unbelievable - fix your broken missile it's BS As for burn times you can quite literally count the burn time in the video as well as in all these
  15. Just wondering what this means from the patch notes ? "Updated all aircraft models." Is this a model update as well ?
  16. Confirmed, it kind of works however after rearm you have to warm each maverick up individually so 3 minutes per maverick and there's no cool down timer track link attached via dropbox https://www.dropbox.com/s/2k53tamedurbyv4/server-20181205-210729.trk?dl=0
  17. fragal

    walleyue

    Same It's basically a non powered maverick, the cool stuff comes with the datalink pod without it it's fire and forget with the datalink pod you can keep the targeting camera active and update target and flight path in real time as it's falling it's pretty cool.
  18. It's like a mini targeting pod for your head, you can look and designate points under a crosshair so in theory you should be to slave a seeker to that point for almost any selected weapon, It's basically about 20 times more useful than the russian one in the migs and flankers. It's not just a fancy helmet for sidewinders.
  19. Sure it's the E and the F because they're the only ones navy hornets carry in real life and we have a navy hornet, other countries or users may carry different ones but ours doesn't. So we get the E and F.
  20. 4 I believe, one per pylon unless someone knows different?
  21. Looking forward to them surprised they didn't come earlier to be honest because there's nothing special about them seeing as 3 aircraft in game already use them a maverick is a maverick, interesting to see if they link into the JHMCS in any way i.e designate a target point by looking then slaving the seeker to the marked ground point.
  22. Yoyo, Any chance of a detailed write up on the 29 and it's new flight model ? Would love to hear some details say any major differences between the A, G and S :D
  23. I think the unannounced control presets have been messing around with axis settings, if your having extreme over pitch issues try clearing and rebinding your pitch and roll axis, worked for me and seemed to damp it out a bit i can now set a decent curve and it flies quite lovely. I noticed this when i had the input overlay up i pulled back the stick seemed to noticeably glitch out. Redid the axis and now seems fine.
  24. got the trim but it literally feels like i touch the pitch up and it feels like i've gone full deflection up on the elevators it's a bit weird.
  25. Is the pitch up supposed to be this aggressive ? Literally feels like i've got the cobra button pressed all the time on the su27 anyone found a pitch to damp it out a touch?
×
×
  • Create New...