Boris

I get the impression lowering the graphics hardly does anything for performance. I even get the feeling, that turning some settings up gives me better fps. I think I've fixed my head tracking stuttering issue by connecting both my Oculus Cameras to the same USB board. There must have been an input disparity that caused it.

Try putting the files in the rar attached into the Saved Games\DCS\Config\View folder. View.rar

Is this performance drop you guys are experiencing associated with stuttering and tearing? I'm getting a really choppy motion when leaning from side to side especially.

No luck. The chat window doesn't let me type...

This isn't accurate. You can't set zoom (FOV) in VR.

You mean at an increase in distance though, yes? I have the problem where planes can be seen from a distance and when one approaches them, the models revert to the actual 3d model and they almost disappear. We should not have a situation where moving towards a target makes it harder to see. The same phenomenon can be seen when zooming.

It doesn't really

I can get the chat window to open, but I am unable to type in it.

I can't type chats in VR. Is this normal?

Basically it's like looking at your screen from 20cm away.

Whoa necropost! No drivers needed. Windows should detect as is.

I don't think the snap views work, but you won't need them. Just lean in a little bit if something is hard to see or read.

I'll check my axis commands again when I get home...

Shouldn't be a problem at all since he has the TM Warthog :thumbup:

Sorry to dig this up, but I'm having the very same issue. The L-39 will yaw abruptly, seemingly at random, in normal, even straight and level flight. I'm certain it has nothing to do with the controllers as this is not an issue in any other module.

You sound like you really want to learn how to fly, so I agree with others in that you're fine to start with the A-10C, even if it's overwhelming. I would actually advise against learning on FC3 aircraft. In fact, don't fly FC3 ever. That's my radical opinion. The beauty of DCS is that you can learn an aircraft and it's systems as they are in real life (or at least extremely close to). I'd recommend learning on an aircraft with no HUD, so that you get in the habit of relying on the analog gauges from the start. The L-39 is perfect for this, and it's a trainer, so it's quite appropriate. I think that's important, as you seem to have very little experience in aircraft controls and need to get the hang of the fundamentals. Once you have that mastered, the A-10C will be a breeze to fly.

Is that realistic behaviour though, or a bug? I can't imagine the radar not being able to pick up the target in real life, if there is no interference.

If eventually they manage it so that buildings really DO change, that would be awesome. But it would be a huge amount of work I expect... Towns would be much larger in their present form, completely different layouts, builings types and ground textures. Would be nice for flying the Mirage 2000 out of Évreux-Fauville though.

Very often I'm having trouble picking up aircraft on radar. I'll have a target dead ahead visually acquired, maybe 10 to 15km away, slightly above, open spaces... and the radar picks up nothing. How can this be?

How realistic is this, seeing as DCS just recently moved to a new engine where this STILL is the case? Would not another completely new engine be required?

Having a 4k screen and knowing how DCS World performs on that, I doubt that it's viable, even for the most powerful systems, to maintain good fps. Unless they come up with some kind of very drastic performance enhancing rendering system... The higher resolution would be very welcome of course, but I think it will take a few more years for the hardware to get to a stage where those pixels can be pushed in DCS.

You know what else would fit perfect into DCSW right now? An F/A-18C :megalol:

What are you talking about? Yes, ED modules take a long time to complete, but the F/A-18 is in the late stages of development... They're producing a new map for it as well as a carrier module. Of course it's going to be released.

Why isn't this a thing yet? I would be great to have full fidelity AWACS modules with different positions modelled, but I'd also settle for something simplified. Maybe just a generic AWACS interface with a radar screen and frequency settings. And why not player controlled GCI as well? It would make multiplayer a lot more interesting, especially for the older generation fighters.

Great, thanks!