Winfield_Gold

Doug Masters pulled the same manoeuvre in a 172 :megalol:

Yes that seems correct, Having the Maintenance manual would end the rocket motor discussion, However Janes Defence 1988 lists 2 rocket motors that were used: Propulsion Rocketdyne MK 47 or Aerojet MK 60 single-stage solid-fueled rocket motor However it does not state which production versions of the 54 had which rocket motors. Of Notable interest, refer Figure D page 6 http://enu.kz/repository/2011/AIAA-2011-6941.pdf Sources: http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=15336.0 http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-54.html http://www.aviatia.net/armament/aam-missiles-air-to-air/aim-54-phoenix/

Good to hear Zeus, looking forward to the upload once your internet is sorted

fantabulous work

Nice

We had news here in Australia that the USA electrical grid was going to be shut down last November to test if the backup systems in place would kick in. That turned out to be a well reported hoax.

Maybe they got caught up flying this awesome jet they haven't had time to put a newsletter together yet

Amazing work gents. Can't wait to buy this puppy

Not uncommon. This still happens with the A-10C in certain situations with SAM missile hits. Wings fall off yet the missiles still remain attached as if floating in thin air.

Looks like it's placed in the right spot as per OP's example video

I am sure some DCS fans just turned in their graves after re-opening this thead

Hi, I'm trying to make it so that and a mission is to destroy a Russian FAC. Using radio coms borrowed from youtube, I've set a zone radius around the FAC and the radio plays, however I want it quieter the further away from the target the blue force is but as they get closer the radio volume get's louder. It's a bit hard to spot 2 infantry on a mountain where the only information being supplied is that the FAC is "to the north of the base" Or do I need to make it several zones and change the radius to say 1500, then another at 1300 and another at 1000 changing the radio volume in each zone so it's louder and louder? I haven't tried that but if someone has an easier way please post it

Good to see. I'm going to miss it when it's fixed

Can't argue with that :) Cheers for posting

EDIT: Question answered

However, the Swedes may be working on implementing the Swedish Made Vehicle (SMV) into DCS World

imagine the incockpit fps on a gtx260 if old mate has his way Does this mean OP wants to see creases in the flight gear as the body produces movement as it would in real life? What about dust particles, maybe OP wants that rendered in the cockpit, as the pilot presses cockpit buttons, a finger moves and touches the panel producing dust particles which happen in real life to fly around and be seen be the awesome light shader or am I just asking to much??

I'd like to fly as RIO. I think it would be good to have knowledge of both sides of the coin. If I created a mission in the ME, will there be an option so that I can choose to be RIO with an AI pilot?

edit: thank you revelation, I found the press release you mention In addition to the actual aircraft, there are other elements that need to be created such as an improved Nimitz-class aircraft carrier, much better carrier operations, and a new combat theater map tailored to this aircraft. We hear you and realize that many of you are very anxious and looking forward to hearing more about this project. As we get closer to an early beta, we will be discussing this more. The team is currently working on a new combat theater map to support DCS: F/A-18C Hornet.”

Where did you get this information regarding an updated carrier? The only information I had on it was when CTD said in a press release they were working on a carrier that would be released with the super hornet. Now that the Super hornet has been put on hold that also means all their other projects are no doubt put on hold. I don't ever remember reading that DCS, ED or the fighter collection where releasing an updated carrier with the C Variant that is being worked on in the current news letter and previous news letters.

1 person not buying the module, 3000+ who are, not really a loss :megalol:

you could always make one yourself.....

I'd like to see a Dassault Rafale one day.

Here I was thinking this was an F-104 thread, how wrong was I