Winfield_Gold

Happy to buy any module endorsed by ED. Looking forward to this one

I am a driver of several older cars. I own 2 aussie built wagons both with worn out rear shocks. When I tow the trailer with 2 motorbikes in the back the car tends to bounce, even on the M1 in Brisbane. I can hit a pretty solid bump, get to a set of traffic lights 100mtrs down the road, stop dead and the car is still bouncing. Point is, maybe the MIG-21 has been modeled with stuffed shocks, after all the plane was designed and built in the 50's. I agree with you 100%, and maybe if it was an F-22 or F-35 that was modeled, maybe the suspension would not bounce as much given the age of the aircraft components. Leatherneck have modeled the aircraft to the age and with aged components, can't get more realistic than that :)

F-16 vs F-16?

Thanks for your comment John, I was informed that it will be "taking up greener pastures in canada" Not sure if it was airworthy before it was stripped but the 2 guys responsible wore shirts from this company for those interested http://www.lortieaviation.com/

Our airport also had a Mig-15 which was privately owned. Unfortunately the local owner and his wife moved to Brisbane to operate the company and aircraft as our city is only small and the operation was not viable here.

An Aircraft based out of Rockhampton Australia which rarely leaves it's hanger was sold and began it's move to Canada on Thursday. One of our plane spotters was on hand to capture the efforts. I sold the ratchet straps and lifting gear to the members who had purchased the aircraft. One was a French National and the other a Canadian National. If I had known about this aircraft earlier I could have gotten some close ups and cockpit photos if a developer was keen to bring this aircraft to DCS.

Filmed on a pentium 486 with overclocked to 50 MHz? :lol:

love it, that's why i'm still running a 486 with x-tree pro

you may as well go back to fsx if your not happy with the product or go and waste your time with x-plane. For every customer who gripes about graphics or tanks on bridges and has a rant, 3 new ED customers are born. You and many like yourself need to go play yeagers air combat for another 5 or so years then come back to DCS. Maybe you will then be satisfied. Let's be serious here, even in it's current form, DCS is better than anything the Janes series ever produced

wow first time I have heard of this. I used the search function up the top of the page and it seems no one else had heard of this issue either. Are you sure it's not just happening on your computer?

derelor was doing this for the a-10c manual. If someone wants to have a crack at the sabre, I suggest forwarding your idea in that direction. Either way, thank you for forwarding your proposal :thumbup: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=78443&highlight=10c+flight+manual+update

Switch from which and create what exactly?

did the set it for player or client? btw the cockpit looks awesome :thumbup:

IDKFA unlocks everything, IDDQD gives you god mode. For the 30+ peeps MLI gives full health and all ammo for every plane

What happens when AI shut down

no campaign.....don't get too excited. I think overall BST have done an amazing job on this aircraft.

I was wondering the same thing when Bruce Willis came out in "Die Hard 4.0" EDIT: I am sure some of the explosions used EDGE technology, especially when the house blows up

Thank you. This is the answer I was seeking

So if EDGE is delayed, Mig will be delayed?

indeed, as would be my goals if I was a software developer. Still does not answer the question as to why it has been previously stated that the rendering engine has nothing to do with planes yet mig boys released a statement saying that it needs EDGE to be released before the mig can be released. If that is the case, why does the sabre work with out edge and the mig doesn't? Previous statements have said that aircraft have nil to do with the rendering engine. Why does it seem that it actually does now?

When VEAO said the hawk needed 1.2.8 to be released prior to release of the hawk, before the legal issues were later stated to be the main hold up. Many times since then, it was said that the rendering engine has nothing to do with planes (boats, cars, helo's etc). 5 months on and apparently it does play a role. Mig guys have stated that EDGE needs to be released (public) prior to the Mig (public). Does this mean that if EDGE is delayed, the mig will be as will? Sabre can be released with out EDGE as was the previous plan, curious why the mig guys need EDGE to make their plane work considering it was previously stated the rendering engine has nothing to do with aircraft. Not phased when it's released as it will be a day 1 buy as with the HAWK and any other aircraft. Curious why moderators and ED testers say one thing yet the developer says another thing entirely different. ED Testers would all no doubt have copies of the Mig, Hawk, Sabre etc etc, has anyone tried it with 1.2.8? Curious to know why it won't work in 1.2.8

I would have gone inverted and flipped him the bird

Great work guys, can't wait to test this against some hawk pilots.

Hope so, can't wait for DCS: Weather Balloon

all this talk of patches makes me want to take up knitting