Winfield_Gold

look at your aircraft compass heading or heading on the HUD. Runway 22 is 220 degrees, runway 16 is 160 degrees etc etc, Or runway 2 is 20 degrees, 7 is 70 degrees that's the real world way of knowing which runway to take off from. wow....those replies above came in quick

i'd rather see another phantom poll than see a civi aircraft poll. AI yes to an extent or free mods yes but paid 172's or airbus a380 etc is a no for me. I have both FSX and X-plane specifically to fly civ aircraft and take in the scenic views. I play DCS to blow stuff up, not phased if world 2.0 comes out in 1 year or 10 years, the reason I'm here buying aircraft is to drop bombs and shoot stuff.

Being Australian, I have to admit that it's true, we do make dodgy camera's Quality control? What quality control?

It's 12:30AM 01\15\2015 and no download link......:)

one could say the Tsar bomba test went wrong. It was designed to be approx 25-30Mt where as in reality is was 50+ does this mean we are getting the Tsar bomba?

Looks internal I believe

wow they had thrust vectoring back in the day

I flew with your old man. VF-51, the Oriskany. You're a lot like he was. Only better... and worse. :)

Fantastic

well it is designed to run on Diesel fuel as well as gasoline and jet fuel. possible cause is rising gasoline prices....

PM Grimes, if it is possible via a script.....he will find the answer

in the OP, the server admin is on the ball hence the problem lies with the client not updating when the server is updated.... in this case...the client needs to be on the ball

anybody else love how it's the same polls using the same aircraft and recycled every month on different threads, especially the 3rd party dev threads. How many times in the last year has the Phantom or Mirage been included in the "next aircraft polls?

I have read through this thread http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=81101&highlight=ai+hold+waypoint+units+dead However, this works for ground units. There is no "hold" for air units. How would it be possible to set an AI chopper to hold at a waypoint until the enemy forces are cleared from a landing zone? I would say that the command "orbit" would have something to do with this, however after testing it a few times, I am not sure how set a trigger so that the AI helo continues to follow the flight path. The stop condition would either be an estimated time it would take to eliminate the enemy forces at the landing zone or via the a Lua predicate where the stop condition would be if 'unit' is destroyed. What would the script be for the lua predicate? has anyone else tried to have an AI helo hold at a waypoint then continue on after enemy units are destroyed? Example mission uploaded for testing. EDIT: Never mind, I figured it out, however those who wish to pull the mission apart can do so. I placed a trigger in front of the friendly ground units, once the grounds units enter the zone, the AI choppers leave waypoint 2 and continue to the drop point. Trigger can be changed to units in zone dead set flag 1 on and it works a treat. case closed Weapons Test.miz

an AI controlled F-111 would be suitable in this sim.

hardly a productive post..... have you no idea how long people have been waiting for the bridge bug to be fixed? The latest update shows a huge amount of progress being made. ED should be commended on their effort, not ranted at about ground troops on their knees.

I'd much prefer a B-52H myself with different players in the positions, and a tail gunner for added bonus.

Not related but not worth starting a new thread about Looks like an M1 Garand, anyone seen this happen before? Looks like it jams at 14.5 seconds, she bolts another round into the chamber and fires I would not like to see the aftermath if it happened to the OP rifle

If aircraft are designed around Beauty, the Harrier would in my books is a heffer.

Armchair pilot strikes again

go ahead, search all 300+ posts, if you have that much time on your hands you need to find a woman. :megalol:

What are you on about exactly? my post was aimed at those on the first few pages complaining how the aircraft doesn't handle right. What is right? My response is justified considering those pointing out how poor the aircraft handles Indeed it is a funny situation when you can't read a sentence written in English and interpret it to be french....:lol:

Robinson R44

reading through this thread is quite amusing, People bagging out the trim and the way the aircraft pulls in 'said' direction How many people on these forums have actually flown the real thing? Only real pilots of this bird should pass the judgment, not keyboard warriors who assume how the bird should handle. When I ask 'flown the real thing' I mean, you took off, flew a pattern and landed. Proof would be video (go pro) with radio coms and spoken english between tower and pilot Anyone who has flown a 210 or similar species of Cessna need not comment.

Indeed it does, and when compared to the video right at the 4 second mark, viewed in full screen, it is obvious that the model used in the video is the "C" varient, unlike the quoted photo I posted Which concludes that as I said previously, Jolly rogers never flew the C model.