Boberro

Well, I am bit sad. It's been said integration probably will end on December. It is February now - it is not 2 week slow down. It is 2.5 months lol.

As far I see only via mails;]

8 votes to go, so tiny.... people vote!

Add auto tracking for Tunguska because you cannot have your mouse movement so stable to keep target designator all time over the target. There should be some kind of lock, like in Shkval or some margin of error, example circle on target. If you manage to keep TD in this circle missile will hit (damage) plane, if you are not able to keep TD in circle over the targeted plane, missile will miss.

Thanks, so count me in :)

I have question - if I vote, does it mean I am obligated to buy it for the negotiated price? What if I am not satisfied with final price? It can go from 199 USD of Saitek's to 189 USD of this site. Then lower price is meaningless so I wouldn't buy it.

But it won't bring divisibility for all cores (nowadays it is 4 mostly), as far I understand everything will be like it is now, but there will be support for multi GPU, which is rarely used.

Such terms as "better" in real life have impact of error margin, so unnoticeable at all.

Nah, vanilla Su-25 would be welcomed in DCS: WWII at most :)

I don't know if to get it or wait for pr0 version which I think will be release after time.

It is Su-25UB, normal Su-25 but double seats.

There is no Rhino or I am blind.

Dank u :)

Are you sure multi GPU not multi CPU? Multi GPU is not widely used so it will benefit almost nobody. Pffff.

There wasn't to be FC3, wasn't to be upgraded cockpit for 25T and more :) It seems there are, so I guess it will be too.

But they will have to do it - are there any other such large maps? Caucasus is classic. If they leave it as is, it would be very weird - it would mean EDGE (better graphic) is reserved only for small, tiny map. It'd mean in practice for most gamers nothing changed at all, because they won't play all the time Nevada only.

This. Of course it could be turnable on\off, but such addons highly improve visual quality IMHO. Some things can be overrated, ones like saturated colors, high bloom ect but if you like it, the overall visuals are much nicer. I remember bloom mod for FC1 or 2. It was good visual boost.

Yes I hope so ^^ And I hope there were much deeper changes made to get better useability of current processors. Significantly better. I know not all things have been finished, is this lighting even possible to achieve in DCS? IMHO much more realistic than weird DCS colors (I believe this is morning map too): Mountains have great tiny fog or whatever that is :)

Well, to be honest I don't see difference between this EDGE screenshot and current engine. Maybe it was done in mission editor.... or EDGE is faster than prettier. Dunno.

It doesn't have "classic" patch. F-16 is known by anyone on the planet, F-18 is just something better than meh :P Nowadays autos have also great goodies and can drive you everywhere. But don't you think Cadillacs have something magnetizing? :D F-16 is such Cadillac.

F-16 would be the huge kicker for DCS and finally plane would be in cool environment. What stops of making it?

For me 100% model viewer as there are no example lighting, images are ugly without shaders and other goodies.

Missiles in HOJ mode are crappy, I mean it is very high chance of miss.

Short without beating around the bush :D

:) So if keeping so huge process on one core, while leaving 3 of them free (in 4 core system) is hardly a problem, so what isn't in terms of getting better performance? Maybe I don't get it right - but for me keeping almost everything on 1 core is a bit odd when we have so heavy app. I hope future design will use all cores, they are not for nice look and stats.