Jump to content

Boberro

Members
  • Posts

    6363
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Boberro

  1. Till ED doesn't do true multi core app, nothing will help. It is not matter of CPU, but application. Even now DCS has huge requirements.
  2. It looks very nice! I hope those ordinary cloud layer textures will be changed though.... they look very weird.
  3. As far I've been told Russian side has much more "free hand" than English. This is why Russians always are few steps ahead. It is good to glance there, Google Translator is helpful.
  4. This is good, some people build hardened underground facilities capable to support living up to 1 year. If I had had big farm I'd have built similar structure my own. These are uncertain times.
  5. It might be right :) Well, doesn't RuAF have more urgend spendings than mighty race for speed?
  6. And the purpose of this, is?
  7. That's nothing. I've seen in Military thread quote of few very big pictures (I don't know I guess minimum 5000x4000 px) only to say "nice pics" :megalol::D
  8. It will never be released so why is it here? Lol
  9. If Nevada comes with same quality as this Azerbejdan it will be OK, if not there won't :P ED could buy this terrain or make this maker to sell them for some price :)
  10. Those who are not interested in Su-22 will burn in hell, painfully :D
  11. It's been a looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong time since last update, so it means ED picked something up and put Nevada aside or something went terrible wrong. Or they want surprise us and release whole new engine together with MiG-21 :D
  12. Whole original DCS graphics looks cartoonish due to weird colors, so why not to get more of it :D
  13. Did I miss smth, because I don't see this update regarding Bison
  14. Amazing :O
  15. SweetFX I suggest :)
  16. After reading this thread I am getting to think
  17. Thanks for update :) It is sad you've been left without funding, but fortunately MiG is on the final end. And I hope you will do MiG-23 and Su-17M4\M5, they're fantastic iconic planes :)
  18. Is it really so important to get their "allowance"? Who cares if there is Lockheed Martin logo or not. There were plenty of other F-16 games around.
  19. There is also mention about Tunguska module possibility: http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2000625&postcount=1740
  20. I am not surprised people are bit tensy about Nevada. It takes longer and longer time. It's been said many planes would come in, how many of them is reality? So far only MiG-21, rest still on the beginning. And there is no beloved F-16 to come :D
  21. HB ^ :)
  22. As far I know if it is burned... it is burned. When I drove 1200 km and had phone camera on, upper part of app burned screen. I only heard very fast change of image (example green, yellow, white, black and so on over and over) can minimize effect. But only very small defects.
  23. But I'd like to fly F-16 when my body is still functional, not when I hit 60 years :P
  24. C'mon stop talking and just make it :D I don't know how it is possible that ED didn't even seriously touch this subject. It is the most famous plane over the world. Some kind of agreement with BMS modders or what.
×
×
  • Create New...