Plagi_Arism

i fix it 2u

Oh man, you gave up this too quickly. Where is your perseverance? (the perseverance what is always pays off - maybe not today but later)

Same here. Immediate crash. Tried revert to 2.5.0 but did not help :huh: 2.5.0 release and openbeta version also crash after reverting. I think the new updater s*rewed up everything (2.7.0.45). :disgust: Downdate also not available (revert) to earlier 2.5.0 openbeta versions.:bomb:

as usual

Really? Because the original Aerosoft 3D model is inaccurate in at least 50 various positions but this ripped model mixing by the "high degree" competence of the neophyte remaker just raised the numbers of the improper places. :doh: Consequently: poor design. p.s. Blaze's "personal" model looks better but very far from perfection too but I am not surprised. ED models (Su-27, Su-33, MiG-29s, F-15s etc.) are also defective in many places. So I'm just crying as you :cry:

Right around ??? :doh: :animals_bunny: And are you still believe in fairy tales too ? :noexpression: OMG :closedeyes:

:doh: OMG !!! Can't imagine the unthinkable ? Sorry man but you are so wrong :smilewink:

Everything is possible in DCS ™ :D For experienced modders this tot (and more difficult things) never will be a problem.

Looks great ? I am a "bit" pessimistic. Unfortunately I do not know how the F-14 flies in real life as many others. I (we) will need to believe in you guys and in the illusion what we will get as a filght model but for God sake: 30 months gone by since we saw the first pics of the "upcoming" Tomcat 3D model and still no textures? (I know what "placeholder" and WIP means but this is crazy) Nozzles look still wrong and inaccurate, plus would have been better to not "put on" those AIM-7s and AIM-9s. Incorrect positions and rotations. Just like a noob modder do. Pain to my eyes. :cry: Again: I am a "bit" pessimistic. How will this module and its flight model "one of the best and most accurate in DCS World" if the visual things that are visible to everybody do not fit ??? :(

? ? ? ? ? missing images :(

You already know the name who can do that easily.

:thumbup:

You need to hire a veteran DCSW expert or a team who can easily achieve your goal. (With their 15+ yrs DCS & LOMAC experiences) They are not only 3Dmodellers, designers, modders, hackers or arists. Much more than that but all DCSW-specific specialist. Not a free but a quick and accurate solution. Maybe you can get some quantitative discount from their fees if you need multiple models or maps. (Don't want to piss you off but they already made several detailed maps which are already used under 2.1+ eke - Certainly for private use) Model conversion with updating LODs, animations, visibilities, making it to PBR shader friendly for 2.1 is cheap, perhaps. AFAIK they can correct and upgrade the 3D model or add special effect too, such as wing and fuselage flex with vapour effects, detailed damage modeling, volumetric spotlights and burners, unique explosions etc. but those are for custom fees.

Today? Cool :thumbup:

Ah, so we need to wait only 83.5 years more. Until the next century. Or...You (or Wags) should surprise us by some screenshots of the new model. If it's true.

Yep. I am sure. Will no issue with this model as an unofficial AI but this won't be realized as official, with permission of ED. Unfortunately.

Unfortunately they won't implement this model. For the same reason why RAZBAM is not making the MiG-23. ED wants to remake the present but old models. MiG-23, MiG-25, Tu-95, F-4E, B-1B, F-16C etc.

:thumbup: Good idea.

Seems there are somewhere a five(+) season mod :( what is 3 years old https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=1999932#post1999932 And I found some screenshots of an interesting old mod too. Longer wingtip vortices but the vortices more visible at higher Gs. :shocking: (it must be 3 yrs old too) About those fake trees above: IIRC modders talked about silly ED erased the back face culling and non-culling function in DCS shaders and in EDM models :doh:, so I guess the problem is those trees got only 1 sided polygons that's why faces cannot be visible as earlier as a non back face culled models. (back faces were visible in that case but without shading on the back side)

Unfortunately the old-style lightning (5 years ago in 1.1.2.1 and before) looked more realistic.

Reaction time of developers and bug-fixers are awfully slow usually. Modders fixed this NAV light problem and the left gear bay door UVW map problem more than a year ago, shortly after the module release. (They already made tons of unreleased/unofficial corrections and updates. Seems like modders letting 3rd party developers and ED to work for their income. :D ) However those visual problems are the most recognizable and the easiest/fastest repairable issues. :doh: The real question is who are actually interested to fix these problems quickly. RAZBAM fix for that left gear bay door UVW map issue come out just about a month. Developers have different priority list than modders and correctors. Always. :music_whistling: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3042832#post3042832 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3033687#post3033687

Good job :thumbup:

Yeah, and I would know that model will be done in the next century. :cry: