Jump to content

EagleEye

ED Translators
  • Posts

    2661
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by EagleEye

  1. Should work now with 1.14.:)
  2. I currently enjoy this game despite the bugs and issues. After all other controllers are unplugged the mouse control works well for me. I had a single CTD until now and performance is good on my old PC. I agree many things are broken and they somewhat failed to deliver a first-time user experience. Visually it`s stunning with the huge stations and I like the fact that you can land on it and visit it. They may lack of diversity, though I have to find out.
  3. OP, see also this one at 1:33: T2wf08tuOX8?t Thread:http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=115728
  4. Release Trailer: 3JyxryysGP8 :joystick:
  5. I´m very much looking forward to the next steps.:thumbup:
  6. I will wait for the first user reports before buying it. From what I´ve seen so far I like the changes they have made.
  7. Also this one: We can only hope, that one day we will get the Ka-52 playable. I don`t hold my breath though. I guess we will have the Mi-24 before...
  8. Oh man...:blow:
  9. Great find Silver! I´m very happy that CA will be improved. Can`t wait for the official announcement.
  10. When I first saw pic 2 then I thought on this:
  11. No problem mate. I thought this was just a funny addition to the everlasting tree discussion.:) And these guys just exaggerate on that topic.:D Isn`t AFM the advanced forest model?:lol:
  12. What!? Where just about to get collidable trees (and that one is still in question) and you ask for trees which will break?:megalol:
  13. The last official I´ve read was this: That was posted on the 2nd of October. Source: http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1892410&postcount=22
  14. Successfull sub kill with waterbombs (released by a Su-25): (Truth mode was enabled later)
  15. Cool, thanks for the heads-up.:thumbup:
  16. Looking good for what it's worth.:thumbup:
  17. Agree! I can imagine that to have tree`s with collisions is not a trivial task, not only for performance reasons but because of the different vehicles (air and ground) in DCS. - will ground vehicles get stuck by a single tree? - can AI vehicles drive around such obstacles? - tree collisions only for aircrafts? - what about the LoS for AI? When thinking about all the ifs and buts I doubt we will get a reasonable solution.
  18. Fingers crossed for reasonable performance with tree collisions test...
  19. Ja, könnte man meiner Meinung nach weglassen. Es hat keinerlei Auswirkungen auf das Spiel. Und wen interessiert es schon was man in einem Spiel fürn Dienstgrad hat...;)
  20. Nicht ganz, die P-51 war eine Spielerei von ED Mitarbeitern (oder nur von Yo-Yo?), die dann irgendwann Nick Grey (von TFC) gezeigt wurde. Nick war so begeistert davon, dass ED (nebenbei) weiter an der P-51 arbeitete und schliesslich gab es ein GO! für ein P-51 DCS Modul. (Quelle: Sicher gibt es einen großen Markt für WWII Flieger und die P-51 zeigte, dass auch Props in DCS gemacht werden können.
  21. Ich verstehe sehr gut, dass einige misstrauisch gegenüber Ilya sind. Ich bin es auch, ABER mitnichten ist er allein an dem Clodo Disaster schuld! Man sollte dem Mann einfach eine zweite Chance geben! Gepledged habe ich für WWII:Europe dennoch nicht. Erstmal abwarten und dann gucken wenns fertig ist...
  22. Seems http://www.leroni.net/ isn`t reachable anymore. Don`t know where one can buy the original campaign now. But you can use BBQ`s updated mission files one by one, without the campaign structure though.
  23. Ah, ok. I thought that can`t be so good looking... Yes, still some hope here as well.
×
×
  • Create New...