MAD-MM

+1

The Good old Question, what he think in Pro and Contra about the old revials 109 and Spit, was these adversary over Time equal? what did he enjoyed on Flying each of the Warbirds what not?

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=205750

After we discuss often witch Setup is workable in Terms of DCS Time and Recourses, and looking in the other Simulations why there are more Players.... DCS is lacking more substantial Setup of Planes... Should get go from the current Planes at First for short Time Period of Development, my Wish list: P-51 1944 Version Fw-190A G/F for Ground Pounding and more reasonable 1944 Setup Bf-109G6 ASM same Reason Hawker Tempest/P-38 for Ground Pounding (replacement for P-47 :( Later one Mosquito Me-410 B-17 or Ju-88 only fly small part of the Players in every other Simulation...don't see this bring us anywhere...

Finally

Leider scheints da ganz schön rund zu gehen momentan, Polychop behauptet der Reddit Post ist mehr oder weniger ein Fake... Polychop-Simulations not sure where ED has said anything on thier official forum. If you are referring zo Hoggit and the person talking in the name of ED, that is forwarded. I personally can not tolerate such bashing and the community should not either, cause in the end this can do a lot of damage to the community too. About contracts with whom and where and what manufacturers back up I am not talking anymore. People have to understand that such behavior of unprofesdional bashing has consequences at some point, which might be that we will not share news for a long time and just produce. It is sad that I have to concider that move

Nothing to say enjoy..

Dogfight Movie from me and David...Hope you like it... Was done on the BS-Server... When DCS is working

Doesn't want that Thread go down in a Whine Thread, only want to point out that eekz can move the Size backwards and fowards in without change of the Player Numbers. Yes i still like DCS, thats why I still complaign foward and backwards... Silence is the Worst...:pilotfly:

And back to DCS, that is not possible for Eekz because the AI makes a stuttering Fest out of the MP session... Even when new players are joining the MP Session, you have currently 5 sec of stuttering and Freezes... And the down Size of the Mission is pain for Allies and Axis, the most know from what is speak Camp Fest par excellence without fun for both Sides..

DCS have every time a lack of Player because of the poor Environment of Planes.. Need ages to come across something new, that's most of the Time the Problem Players rejecting DCS.. There only comes at Times back when Normandie or 2.5 was released, when they dont like the far Distance they could play ACG as Example but there is also not any Player left... But dont see any Time soon changes or new stuff that would increase the Player numbers sadly...

Dani wie hast du den bis jetzt die Flugzeuge gekauft? Weil MIG-21 hast dir ja auch geholt soweit ich mitgelesen hab? Vielleicht mal über Paypal nachgedacht? Ich will dir nichts aufreden, Paypal geht am einfachsten mit DCS...

Danke :thumbup: mal wieder was dazu gelernt.. So geht's natürlich wesentlich einfacher...

Hey Kapott, also normal sind deine Kopfbewegungen im Replay Track mit drin, am bestens nichts drücken im Replay weil sonst meistens die Aufzeichnung deiner Kopfbewegung als erstes verschwindet bzw abschaltet. Die Aussenansicht oder besser nicht Aussenansicht wird auch im Replay von den Server einstellungen vorgegeben, es geht mit einem kleinen Trick... Nimm dein Replay .trk File aus deinem Replay Ordner, du musst dan die Dateiendung dan in .miz umbennen, mit dem Missionseditor öffnen und dan Aussenansicht erlauben einstellen. Danach wieder File in .trk umbennen, aber schau dir deine Replays vorher erst an, weil die meisten nach 10-20Min nicht mehr Brauchbar sind weil die MP Aufzeichnung nicht mehr Sychron ist zu dem was tatsächlich passiert ist leider :/ Weil DCS nicht wirklich deinen Flug aufnimmt, sondern deine Eingaben speichert und nach fliegt..

Is just me or is change log going shorter and short for 16 GB unpacked Patch...would be nice to know what actually does?

Thx Pat, have to ask again because for me pretty anoying, I use 2 seperate Joysticks for Vivane and Flight controll. (Sidewinder and XK-12+joystick) The Joystick interfering each other in the Vivane Controll, the Sidewinder moves the Vivane in Hover but this not setup in the Controll Menue anywhere. I am not able to setup only my second Joystick for Controll Box. Is there way to fix this? or comes this from Multicrew Cockpit? Thx

Would also interested how could I Send a Gift?

Saburo that doesn't help, its not related to Language I try this... Something with DCS...

With the F-5 DCS instant crashes after unpause the Game...

Have the same Spit without Power, K4 is on instant Flight all Systems off, and FW-190 Gear Buttons are in Neutral Position (not possible) when you give electric Power the Gear comes up :D And downloaded Patch normal per Torrent. By the Way have German DCS Edition, my Wingman with English doesn't encounter this Problems... Something with Translation for the Keys wrong possible?

Is the Spit now fixed or not? there is no Notes in the Patch?

New Jets are so unstable that even Pilot can not Fly this thing with PC in the Back Round, and why the do this to enhance manoeuvrability to neutral stable Plane. From WW2 perspective without Computer Chips in the Planes they have stable Layout, but always with Focus to reduce as much as Possible Drag and enhance Flying Characteristic, was not a help to make a easy handle Plane for the Pilot. And there is more then once mentioned in the German Literature the Pilots make the Tail heavy Trim to over come the Stick Forces and be more agile when they get Jump from above, the Spitfire is there wonderful with little bit Training, but even the RAF claimed the Spit have a little bit to low Stickforces and hard to handle. This doesn't make comfortable Ride for Level Flight. German Pilots makes fun about it they have different strong Legs to counter Engine Torque because of constant ruder input....

And next one..

The Dora is realy sensitive where the Center of Gravity is located for Turn Fights, as all other Planes also... When you defuel on the Ground it's drains first the rear Tank empty, before the defueling touch the Front Tank. This shifts the COG more foward in a even more unpleasant Position as it should be, with turning Capacity of a Brick. For normal Flight Conditions the Foward Tank is the first one how is empty with á difference of 100 Liters to the rear Tank. With full fuel Load it is to heavy for the most small dogfight Areas.... Should work like on the P-51, where you not fly with one Wing Tank full and the other empty.

The "Hind-E" carried two hard points for these missiles at the wing endplates. Experiments were conducted around 1986 to increase the firepower of the Mi-24V by doubling the number of missiles attached to the wing tips and also by hanging under the outboard wing pylons double racks that could carry four additional missiles each (they were probably the same type of rack as that fitted to the Ka-29). Therefore, a Mi-24V in that configuration could carry up to 16 anti-tank missiles! We hardly dare to imagine the devastation that a single squadron equipped like that could, at least theoretically, have inflicted on the armored forces of NATO... However, we do not know to what extent that weapon configuration had been implemented at the unit level. The fact is that such a configuration was observed at least partially in the GDR, as shown in the photo above left. The usual configuration, however, was limited to two missiles attached to the wing tips (four missiles in total), sometimes augmented by two additional missiles attached to double racks under each outer wing pylon (eight missiles in total).