Farlander

Your opinions sounded rather close to being statements, but sure.. I am sorry if it sounded hostile, not meant to be that way, i really don't care much about what version would be best. Personally i'd take a russian aircraft over anything :P Edit: Btw.. i responded to mattegubben the way i did becuase he properly states that it is his opinion, and he sees the subject from both sides.. Does anyone know if any Navy variants were fitted with maverics?

No worries, i'd like either.. :P I just don't like it when people insist their vision is more correct than others because of their opinions. Either version will be more than capable tbh...

Like most people i would not draw to any assumptions on what most people would like without any proof. Personally i don't see why you can say your interests are more valid than what my opinion is.. Yes personally i'd rather have the ability to land on carriers and do carrier ops with friends in F-14's, F-18's than the ability to carry a gun and be more "multi role". That's my opinion, does not need to be your's.. but i don't need to tell everyone who don't agree with me that their opinion is shittier than mine.. I like muh carrier landings. Sorry.

just make it a option in the menu to have it simplified...

Personally i'll take a carrier hook over a gun. In my opinion with the upcoming carriers it will make for alot of interesting missions compared to what we have now.. Gun is nice, but we need more naval aircraft :)

These comparisons are taking it too far..

Leatherneck is love, Leatherneck is life :) Can't wait to fly the MiG and shoot some virtual svenskjævlar ;) Oh, nvm.. I'll probably be too hyped over a scandinavian a/c to fly the MiG...

Hello :) Lonewolf (for now) Callsign: [uSSR] Farlander Side: Red Preferred A/C: MiG-21Bis

This does not work in MP, right? (normal servers)

1+

Umm..

I wanted to report that my cable mod has worked, and after i modded it the cable has never broke the connections again. I had to do this because my flight seat is also my normal seat so i need to use the connection several times a day. Been working for the last 4 months. Much longer than the initial two weeks at least :P PM me anyone if you have troubles with it and i can help you out. Great product, i highly reccommend it.

How close are we to get both out the way? I want the 262 :D :joystick:

It's a joke on reddit where he promised to eat a sock if the mirage didn't release on the planned day.. Reddit remembers for a long time...

I don't know if you've been following development.. but.. Su-33, F-14, F-4U? those will all take advantage of new carriers.. (maybe not so much the F-4U)

In most peoples mind, anything being added to the game will slow down the f-18 devlopment by x^2 amounts of months. x being how long it took to develop the new feature.. I'd love to see more vehicles in DCS :) you can pull the digital combat simulator card on trainers, but not on combat vehicles :)

I have a feeling uboats would feel at home here in the uboats thread :)

I'll add sock eating to the progress chart so that we don't forget it :)

Many. :D

I was told the hump was first fitted on the F variant, but E's recieved an upgrade. I can see why people would like a version without it, so it would be cool if we could make two variants, but for now this version will be the one. #humpsneedlovetoo

The initial part was for RAZBAM That part you quoted there is a joke.. They sent out pictures of the AT-802 some time back when the speculation was going on..

I pray for AT-802 every night, but i will take this for compensation. Leatherneck, please.. hear my cries!! :(

Thanks, you are welcome to help any time! :)

Joining in a bit late here guys.. Thanks to all of you for the nice comments.. We are all quite hyped over having our own project and the positive reaction from you guys help us going at it. It's driven by the community afterall..

I've landed the MiG-15 on the carrier, are you saying i cannot make it in the f-5 even if the hook works?