Jump to content

Farlander

3rd Party Developers
  • Posts

    574
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Farlander

  1. Little different for me.. in coop missions im getting 1000 ping in some missions and in others as low as 80 (normal).. In any other plane im getting normal ping.
  2. Sorry, but i haven't gotten a good image from you during this time. All i've seen is complaining from you, most would just let it go and check back once in a while, but you feel that you need to continue to bring the project down as much as you can. has he done anything to you? because from what i can remember it is 100% a personal choise to keep spending time hyping yourself up for something. I welcome all people who want to expand to flight sim products, no matter if it stays as a project or goes full scale production. I do not remember him taking any money for his projects, so like i've said earlier, what's so bad about it? 3 years without a finished product makes me less likely to trust him, but in no way an embarrassment.. he's done more than most here and not charged anyone for it.
  3. To do by radar fix for Rb-15 deployment- press BX press a number on the numpad ( 8 ) press T1 fix slew cursor onto radar contact press TV Fix to set it Do the same procedure for BX7 but put it a (little) away from the target along the path you want to engage from hope that works out for you :)
  4. Personally i'd rather have various airplanes over historically accurate maps for all units.. for me it isn't that game breaking to fly ww2 aircraft over caucasus anyways, it's just terrain like any other..
  5. Farlander

    I-16

    Absolutely can't wait! One of my favorite looking warbirds!
  6. It was! we're loving this new feature. I heard now that they got a total of 6 kills last night (after i left :( )
  7. It's gonna try it's best to make you fail. AIM-9B's and a gun that isn't known for reliability. Maybe we should just model the gun constant jammed for realism.
  8. Awesome work! Bit dissapointed it's in NTTR, but keep up the good work. This is exactly what DCS needs.
  9. Farlander

    I-16

    Awesome!
  10. Do we know what version of MiG-19 this is, it has a radar in the nose it seems, so maybe it's the P or later variant? One could hope for K-13 support :D
  11. Oh, cool. i stand corrected.
  12. Meh, personally i can't see how there would be a big difference between 3dsmax 2014 and 2017.. but a blender plugin is awesome!
  13. They literally said on the AMA, "why not", "we'd love to do another soviet aircraft". You're trying to speculate too much, why would a soviet fighter take more time than a western one?
  14. What? Come with sources please.. Asked in the AMA if they were looking at ever making a soviet plane again, the didn't say they werent. Dont know where you got this from, some speculation?
  15. Awesome guys! looks great
  16. This looks great guys! Would love to see this going forwards. It can be a steep hill, as i think most people who have created aircraft for dcs has found out, and we certinly found out as we worked on the A-4, but i think you have guys have good potential to manage it. Definately recommend just doing one plane first though, it's great to have two models available, but i think you'll find one is more than enough work to finish. Get in contact with wags, your 3d models seem within the needs :)
  17. X-Plane 11 Beta available now! http://www.x-plane.com/
  18. First of all a random poll is probably not a deciding factor.. second of all.. what are these choices? If you do make a poll, at least include app aircraft that could fill the role, not just some few that you like. This coud really just be said in any of the other whishlist threads (not being mad or anything, just.. dunno) As for what airplane i'd choose.. probably the Tunnan
  19. Reasonable. I think stuff is actually happening now, we've seen some prototypes of CDU etc. seems promising. I think we'll be seeing more prototypes in the future (i hope)
  20. I have absolutely nothing against an opinion, free speech. But there is a time and a place. If you had a set deal with some guy about a product and money was exchanged and nothing came. That is a real problem, but to be complaining on some sim enthusiast who is working towards selling sim equipment and who is still just working on it and hasn't made any real promises or taken money is in my opinion, a bit too much. You decide to hold off your purchase of something else by this project, ok. that's your choice. he does not have any responsibility for what you do, and if you did hold off it had to be pretty evident to you how there are risks of it not being released when you hoped for. You can voice your opinion, it's fine, but when i see this thread now i'd personally actually rather want it to just be locked to actual development updates from hegykc. Because most of the discussion seems to be not of the products, and more on discussing how he will fail/not fail. i don't want to discuss the same thing that's been going on for long over a year with little added criticism other than "he's not shown anything yet" or "im dissapointed by his delays" or "it's a scam" or similar. Actual production advice, ideas etc would be nicer. I understand you can be disappointed, but have you read the last 50 pages?
  21. Some of us likes to follow progress. I dont mind seeing projects i cant buy. I do mind reading through a thread about it with most comments being "when will you give us update?", "this project will fail/failed" and other just, non needed comments.
  22. Im surprised too. Do we really feel we need to bash this guy with hundreds of comments on how we still cant purchase his stuff? Hes not sold anything, you've not given him anything, if you don't think it's worth waiting for tell yourself that and leave without a comment. Seriously, it has only taken up one thread slot for a few years, it doesn't hurt.
  23. And counterweight i think
×
×
  • Create New...