kobeshow

Me and quite a few other regulars have been wishing for this for a while now (since round 7 or something). It is basically the single best thing you can do for fuelruns. Everyone can do it, chopper pilots don't feel like flying mules and can concentrate on attacks/defenses, and the cargo plane script can just be left out, one thing less to put strain on the server, and it was broken 50% of the time anyways.

Yeah, shared lives for red side currently. But it is something to think about, would it be possible to have an overall lives pool in addition to the individual lives that get reset? Throw all aircraft into the same category, or give them different values and treat these like tickets, if a side goes down to zero it loses.

Yes I was going to say that at first, but I thought I'd give him SOMETHING, since the chopper combinations that he wanted to be effective + CAP can practically destroy anything already:D

This is sadly not the case. It is a problem that I alludet to earlier, please refer to my comments in this thread. They beauty of things is that apparently no one is to blame for this, and something seems to be going wrong in the "chain of commmand". In the end it doesn't matter who is responsible for the missing patchnotes, it just gives an unprofessional look to an already dicey subject.

So you are saying the only helicopter which can effectively attack something is the KA50, which is the only attack helicopter in the game:huh:? Any measure that would lead to not requiring help from other players to accomplish a task is counterproductive to the spirit of Blueflag.

Precisely the reason why I stopped using the mods, no IFF. Sedenion, it would be greatly appreciated if you find the time to update them, I was especially fond of the VTH one, made things easier to read and less cluttered. Thanks in advance, and don't listen to the naysayers, no one is forcing them to use your great mods :thumbup:

Sooo, what is up with ED not having included any of the changes to the Mirage in their official updates, however small they may have been since the Harrier announcement?

Completely asymmetric units are all fine and dandy but you will have to consider the capability of those units aswell, and tailor the respective side's victory conditions to them. Right now both sides have the same victory conditions, so not having a F18/A10/Harrier? (the truly capable strikers that can kill multiple targets in one pass easily) would cripple red if the scenario stayed the same. I wish I were able to put some time into DCS scripting to come up with a proof of concept mission to showcase that maybe having asymmetric starting conditions and asymmetric goals might spice things up. What I have in mind is to award victory points for certain actions/objectives for the sides, and the first side to get to X points gets the WIN. The fact that the map is also not a mirrored playing field might help with this idea even more.

webpage is still stuck for me ):

Yeah it has been stuck for a week, now it has changed but seems to be stuck again in a different state.

Die Frage war meiner Meinung nach recht deutlich gestellt, aber mit dem Rest hast du auch Recht.

Bullseye anzeigen lassen: -sicherstellen das der gewünschte Wegpunkt auf dem Radar zu sehen sein könnte (range, heading) -PREP 01 (wenn Wegpunkt 01 dein BE werden soll) -direkt danach VAL, und es erscheint ein +1 (für WP02 ein +2 usw.) auf dem Radarschirm um den Wegpunkt zu markieren -man kann sich bis zu 4 WP anzeigen lassen Es ist wichtig dass man immer frisch den Wegpunkt mit PREP auswählt, selbst wenn er schon auf 01 steht, denn sobald ein wenig Zeit vergangen ist wird VAL nicht mehr den Wegpunkt auf dem VTB sichtbar machen.

of course, I kind of include that as in "covering friendly airfield/FARP"

I just think that chopper pilots feel alone most of the time, so they want to have something they can do on their own time, but I think Blueflag is not the place for that. Blueflag is also not the place for fighters to just fly towards the enemy and kill them. If you are not covering something you are not doing anything.

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=156951&page=4 Soll angeblich nicht funktionieren im Moment, habe das selber aber nicht testen können im neusten patch. Wenn du es vorher schonmal benutzt hast dann weisst du sicher dass der Lichtkegel sehr kurz ist, darauf also Acht geben.

Me neither, but apparently people expirience all kinds of trouble, when using SRS, that I'm not having, but that could be an excuse of course (;

Was noch fehlt ( + o.g. Dinge ): Um der Mirage noch mehr Möglichkeiten im Lufkampf zu geben wären die Funktionen am VTB ganz nett, target sorting sollte dann noch angenehmer werden. Ansonsten noch paar Funktionen für den Comfort(zB HUD brightness), und as automatische Aufschalten auf das alte Ziel in den CCM. Dann muss das INS noch gefixt werden. Und ein paar der Bomben sind zwar schon drin, aber die funktionieren halt nicht so wie sie eigentlich sollten, da wird noch auf Waffentemplates seitens ED gewartet. Weiterhin wird auch im Moment die Logik für die Auswahl am PCA, und auch ein bisschen was an der HUD Symbolik angepasst. Dann soll es wohl noch paar Kleinigkeiten am Flugmodell geben, aber die gibts ja immer. EDIT: was mir noch so einfällt Luft-Boden Raketen Präzision anpassen (wie bei der GUN geschehen) Takeoff roll ist wohl auch nicht ganz koscher, kann ich aber selber nix zu sagen

I was more adressing the SRS specific problems on disconnects and insta death that jackmckay was alluding to (never expirienced them myself). If you are dead you have the time to alt-tab and reconnect to SRS. And yes I am on TS and SRS, and sometimes even relay messages to people who refuse to use one or the other.

So the only times SRS doesn't work is when you are dead ? That doesn't sound too bad. Keep in mind that you can connect to SRS at any time, no need to restart the game or reconnect to servers.

tja ich bin echt ein bisschen baff, https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3130849&postcount=1154 bestätigt nur meine Befürchtung dass das angestrebte Ziel von 2 Modulen pro Jahr für RAZBAM wohl auf ein "bis 80% fertigstellen und dann schnell zum nächsten Modul" hinausläuft. Aber hey vielleicht ist das ja auch Bedingung für Drittentwickler :D

I think they need some more time to remove that flag aft of the boat, that looks dangerous :D

It depends, but people on red somehow have the opinion that using SRS akes you a try hard. Personally I disagree with that notion. No one demands perfect brevity, but just giving information that is relevant for other people on the same channel in a clear&compact manner would go a long way on red side. Sadly it may never happen. I have resorted to being on all the coms channels, I try to ignore the blabbering and really need to focus on what is relevant to me, sadly that does not give you a feeling of flying in a team that often. SOMETIMES IT IS HAPPENING THOUGH !

Shame, there was a time when it worked, albeit without an additional HOTAS command. And since we are on the subject of exterior lights anyways, is there a chance that RAZBAM could increase the length of the light cones for taxi/landing/refuel/police -lights? I suppose that is something on EDs side but hey, you never know^^ wait didn't they work on a new lighting engine? just two more weeks, but then the light will be new and the cones still short, they will be aware of the issue and it will be a WIP ...

Wenn man die Augen ganz eng zusammenkneift kann man wenigstens den Flugzeuträger erkennen :D