Destroyer37

I would also like to see this additional airbase, however I'm not holding my breath.

P-3 Orion P-8 Poseidon IL-38 IRIAF C-130 C-5 Galaxy Just to name a few. Thanks!

Anyone?

I would love to see an Advanced Waypoint option to allow unlimited fuel. Similar to the advanced Waypoint action that allows you to have invulnerability turned on for the ships. What I'm thinking is for tankers that are up in the air.

Is there a server config file somewhere where you set the servers IP address?

There is an old thread out there where Cobra stated the F-14 would come with ANVIS-9's. I'll see if I can find it.

I would like to propose the addition of a third Faction, Grey. Currently in DCS you can either be red or blue. If there is a selectable neutral faction inside of the mission editor, you could have red fight blue and grey, or blue fight red and grey. And the neutral faction could fight everyone.

@Cobra, Thank you not only for the Chromecat but also the transparency and quick responsiveness to users questions. We really do appreciate all of Heatblurs effort in developing what I believe will be the best and most popular module in DCS history both past and future and I for one cannot wait to get my hands on it. Well done, and thank you again.

@Cobra, Any intent of keeping the chromecat paint for the end user?

If it had it I would expect it. The pod should be an option to expect limitations of DCS or otherwise.

Thanks Eddie

Look at your flow gauges in the pit, it should tell you a readout of fuel flow in lbs per hour for each engine. They are near your right thigh in the A-10.

Minimum fuel to return to intended point of landing plus taxi fuel. It's very subjective and many factors go into planning it. Take your average fuel burn and multiply that by how long it will take you to get back. I know it likely not the answer your looking for but I hope it helps.

Things are "Needed" or things are wanted Capt? I personally think the F-5E-3 is on par with what the aircraft actually is...just sayin. I need one of those sweet golf carts though in the video above!

ANVIS-9's properly modeled with binocular imaging tube's would be more appropriate. I'm fairly unhappy with the state of the NVG's in 2.5ob. Something else to consider when wearing NVG's you wear them quite close to your eye. Thus eliminating some of the outside images we see currently in DCS.

Same issue as OP +1

Well, Bagram looks about like I remember...

Redundancy, in case of system failure or damage. Or if they just want to make a quick visual adjustment to the fall of the rounds. When I was in the military on our crew served weapons the gunner was usually down the sights while spotters or observers were observing the fall of the rounds. Without tracers that is still possible but much more difficult. Tracers can also be used for ranging information.

If for nothing else the conformal fuel tanks look great, not 3.7 million great but pretty good none the less.

I'm having this issue as well.

Same exact issue.

Wish list item: Take off from ground option for all aircraft in the simulator. This will allow mission makers such as myself the ability to populate smaller airports with more aircraft if all the parking spots are taken.

Hey folks. I have a triple monitor setup ( 3 x horizontal 5760*1080), using the 3 Screen option in DCS with the correct aspect ratio everything is working fine. However there is a fish eye effect on every screen so it causes a different focal point on all three screens with very slight bending at the edges. Does anyone know how to fix this? Its almost like having six eyes looking in six different directions. For what its worth, I am NOT using nvidia surround. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I also have this issue in 2.2

One thing you can do now is place aircraft on the ground as "Takeoff from Ground", now you have a blank canvas, throw some buildings around it and have fun!