Jump to content

RoflSeal

Members
  • Posts

    333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RoflSeal

  1. Someone give that man a Track IR/Trackhat/soldered together LEDs.
  2. Are you flying between 1200-1300?
  3. The best multi-function of the two is the Sabre. It can carry both rockets and some heavy bombs while the MiG only has 2 100kg bombs. Both have clickable cockpits, they both have EFM if that is what you ask, but Belsimtek is still tweaking them since they mentioned them in the 1.5 patchnotes. There are some premade missions for both of them though its not much. There is no campaign. Sadly multiplayer scene is pretty empty. I pretty much never see a Korea server with more then half a dozen people. Sabre vs MiG dogfights are probably the most intense in the game when you get in one. (And even more sadly, the timing of the MiG vs Sabre contest couldn't of been at a worst time for me :( )
  4. Yep I have the same problem just this update. Have not changed anything and no problems with other modules.
  5. ☐ Not rekt ☑ Rekt ☑ Really Rekt ☑ Tyrannosaurus Rekt
  6. Anybody else think that the 2 aircraft are both Viggens?
  7. AFAIK Konkurs does not use laser guidance, Kornet on the other hand is a beam rider. (also can someone help me since all the buttons on the forum (e.g. edit, quote etc) are now in Russian)
  8. i5 vs i7 shouldn't be much different since no games currently take advantage of hyperthreading that i7 CPUs have. If you want smooth 4K you need multiple high end GPUs (980Ti, Fury X etc), CPUs haven't advanced nowhere near as much as GPU. e.g. 2011 i7-2600K is not that much slower then i7-6700K (only like 10-15% slower and you can pretty much close that distance by overclocking), whilst a GTX 580 just cannot compete vs GTX 980 If you want smooth 4K you need substantial VRAM (which I would say 3.5GB of GTX 970 is just not enough)
  9. Dynamic Campaign would be so sweet.
  10. Well Ground forces AI need to be massively improved for a DCS ground module to be viable especially regarding things like soft cover.
  11. Not really since we already have aircraft with relaxed stability in DCS (Su-27). It's not something new in DCS.
  12. You have to turn them on now on startup (its on the left side of the cockpit)
  13. It's also a problem in the MiG-15 and F-86. The canopies are dirty as hell.
  14. But Zeros didn't drop torpedos. If we are going to have the Pacific, I would rather have a map where a protracted campaign took place like Guadalcanal and the surrounding islands in the Solomons rather then where 1 days worth of airstrikes took place.
  15. Why not both? It's not likely that the 3D artist is the same person who does the programming for the FM.
  16. WW2 G-3 suits used by USAAF had ~1G resistance.
  17. Is there actually an animation of them getting out? I do want to see a video of that.
  18. I honestly think Boeing weren't even trying and just put their B-Team up to it.
  19. It's probably hard to see in the picture because there is so much crap and scratches on the MiG-21s windscreen + it's a picture so the Su-27 is not moving and instead camoflages with the rubbish. Human eye is attracted to movement.
  20. Yeah, but contemperory means built/produced/living around the same time. So both F-4 and F-5 are contemperories.
  21. You can see it here at around 1:40
  22. F-15 and Su-27 use PFM A-10A, Su-25 and Su-25T (I guess you can lob that in with FC3 style) use AFM/AFM+ Only Su-33 and MiG-29 use SFM and ED said those will be updated in the future.
  23. RoflSeal

    Anime Thread

    I like the Characters designs. in Flight Highschool more.
  24. I dunno what to say except thanks :)
×
×
  • Create New...