Redacuragsr

Yea that's true, I enjoy having having the option to enjoy the work of different modders, free or paid. But from what I understand if it does become upgraded to NTTR standard, then there might be a possibility of it being locked, either way then everyone will get a free upgrade anyway, it just might take while. In the mean time I can enjoy new content....I hate waiting.

Very nice job Starway, probably a day 1 buy for me. I can't believe people are complaining about an OPTIONAL DLC. For those that can't afford it I understand that, and there are really good options out there for you for FREE, like Bartheks texture and other modders which look just as good if not even better. But for me $15 is totally worth it, and I am thankful that there are members of the community that are able to add to the creation of content so that ED can concentrate on what they do best, the core product. After spending so much money on our PC's whats a few more dollars to enhance the experience (at least for me).

Figured out the p-51 problem...immortal setting Duhhh Interesting theory about the F-15, but strange because first of all the flanker was designed second and to take on the f-15 so I would think the Russians would design it with the characteristics of the 15 in mind (if they were fully known of course at the time) In fact when they build the first prototype the main engineer decided to scrap the project and go back to the drawing board because it could not match the known characteristics of the 15. Why is it not likely that the F-15 will pull enough g's to bring it anywhere near to taking serious over-g damage? Is it because of the FBW limits? Or is it because it is a BVR fighter so it has no need? Theoretically speaking wouldn't the flanker reduce it operational hours as well by pulling high G's but not necessarily break its wings, other wise you would pretty much have a fleet of planes that are useless if piolets break the g limits for a few secs. I think that the laws of physics apply to all the planes equally (with some adjustments of course for structural design). regarding the s keys and the 30g turns, well yea that is pretty ridiculous and would definetly do some damage. From what i remember from playing BMS the F-16 and even the mirage both have a FBW over ride switches for extreme situations, not sure if the 15 does or not, but it seems that it probably would have something similar as well, in which case it should be able to break a wing also IMHO ofcourse.

I assume that holds true for other aircraft as well, the g-load limit being reduced that is...like the f-15 for example. I noticed a couple of other strange things after the last update though (Well may be they are strange), I was flying fully loaded at around 900 kph when I executed 30 degree left bank without even pulling back on the stick yet and lost my left wing, so if you are just banking to one direction is there supposed to be a possibility of loosing a wing as well? also (and i know this is not related to this thread)but while flying the P-51D I was trying to do everything possible to break my wings, but couldn't do it after this update, i remember from flying this aircraft before that it wasn't too hard to do it before. To be fair its been a few months since i flew the mustang though so not sure if its the last update, but can't help to think that it could be related to the update. Just wanted to put it out there. Thanks.

Thanks for the explanation GGTharos. I guess that makes sense, I always assumed that the plane was designed to be more capable than the piolet even with a full combat load.

This might have been discussed here already, so I apologies if I'm asking it again. How come the wings on the flanker break off all of a sudden when doing high g turns, wouldn't the piolet black out first, so that would be your indication that you are pulling to many g's, however in this case the wings just break off without any indication of a pilot going into g lock. Does that mean the piolet can sustain a higher g load than the plane? That's what seems strange to me, or am I missing something?

+1

They already had all these objects created and placed, and from what I remember they were pretty historicly accurate. With some good retexturing it would be very sweet.

It would be really cool if ED came out with a DLC to repopulate the old Crimean map from the lock on days, I mean we can still fly there. I would definitely pay for that. Sorry to go off topic, just wanted to put it out there.

Just found your post, haven't looked at it yet, but definitely looks interesting. Always interested in learning different peoples approach to BVR. Thanks.

Dogfighting yes....BVR is a different story, I think a Mig-29A with the 80's load out is a pretty challenging and a fair opponent for the Mirage even in its current stage.

Thats what I like to hear, if the Mirage is any indicator of the quality of work you guys are doing, the F-15E its going to be freaking awesome (and I am a Russian birds kind of guy), definitely a day one pre-order for me. You guys are just amazing, RAZBAM you have me as a customer for life.

I like it, keep up the good work

You are the man, this is the mod that I have been looking for for a long time :thumbup:

Here are some videos made by my buddy TAW_Tkid

Yea he is definitely wasting his resources. Because he is doing everything from scratch himself, I think thats why this project is probably dead, no updates from the developer in a long time. But the avionics and systems looked very very detailed for both cockpits. If he just became a 3rd party developer he wouldn't have to do it from scratch, and this would have turned out to be a very cool module, and probably would gave been out by now. Thats really too bad :(

Here is a video:

There was a guy that build a really cool Apache simulator by himself, but not sure what happened to it. I wish he would be a 3rd party developer. Check out his work right here: http://www.combat-helo.com/

Sorry if I am a little slow to catch on, but I also just read through this entire thread and don't understand what the exploit is. Can some one please explain it to me in simple terms. Are you saying saying that Russian missiles don't work good at all, or they work too good, or is there something wrong with using a lot of chaff and flares? Besides the usual lag and warping that makes missiles loose track, is there something else that's not right or is considered cheating? What exactly are we talking about.

I am having a similar issue since the last patch as well, also on the 104th and other servers as well.

Razbam is the model of what a 3rd party developer should be like, a 4th gen aircraft that everybody wants, on time releases, great communication with the community, and an excellent work ethic. Keep up the good work. I will buy everything you make, you got a customer for life.

I am big Flanker fan, but if you guys came out with the F-15E next, I would definitely switch to the eagle. Too many good memories in that bird from the Janes F-15 days.

I would love to see the F-15E

Very interesting thread. Before I read this I thought I was going crazy, I found similar flight model changes in 2.0 with other aircraft as well, like the Flanker, the Eagle, and the Blackshark, just in case anyone is interested.

That's an exciting clue. Looks like 2016 will be a great year for DCS.