petsild

I remember that before the update, VRS with a much lighter machine was a common thing and that's why I didn't use AI. If it helps I'm in favor of adjusting the speed. thank you for responding.

It behaves randomly, I crash at the end of a short recording. VRS.trk

I fly with no ammo in the gun and only 70% fuel, that's not my case.

It's just happening from the slowest speed.

On the second attempt to stop, I fell into the VRS, George is still dangerous.

Currently the NLR pad has no support for helicopters?

Hi, lately DCS has been taking too long to start, it happened after a recent update. The cockpit also takes too long to load in multiplayer. I have a fairly fast M2 ssd and 64Gb ram along with RTX4090 graphics. The same problem is confirmed by other fellow pilots, so the components have a minimal effect on the long loading.

Be sure to disable all e-cores directly in the bios. Everything will be smoother with higher fps and lower consumption.

New Sinai Trailer Reveals Functional salute Animation?

I confirm the main rotor disappears.

There must be a significantly larger speed difference without FSR and full armament, just read the notes of real pilots!

Otherwise, why is the Apache slow without ammo/fcr with minimal fuel?

Currently it is not possible to fire in pilot mode am I understanding this correctly?

Hi, the principle of how the helicopter works is clear to me, but the explanation from Raptor9 is general for all helicopters. But this does not correspond to our Apache, what is in the DCS, if I remove the weight of the helicopter, without ammunition, fuel and without FSR, it is still too slow and the comfortable control speed is at a low 125-135knots. Moreover, after exceeding such a speed, the helicopter becomes quite uncontrollable. At the same time, all well-known military encyclopedias mention significantly higher speeds of the loaded machine! Please ED Apache needs flight model revision thank you. https://asc.army.mil/web/portfolio-item/apache-attack-helicopter-ah-64d-e/

First you need the latest beta version: https://www.guru3d.com/files-details/msi-afterburner-beta-download.html

Do you think that the best graphics card will always provide you with 144 fps?

Try the latest beta which is ready for fresh graphics. https://download-eu2.guru3d.com/afterburner/[Guru3D.com]-MSIAfterburnerSetup465Beta4Build16358.rar

I currently find the Apache cockpit the most demanding, and it doesn't even have a functional radar, but it also depends on the number of ground units on the map. For the benchmark, I would choose the free module route in combination with a challenging mission.

I have added the data.

Raw data of Plasma Torture Map on RTX 4090. 4x MSAA + x1,5 SSAA: Average framerate : 97.2 FPS Minimum framerate : 66.9 FPS Maximum framerate : 122.3 FPS 1% low framerate : 53.3 FPS 0.1% low framerate : 44.4 FPS Edit: details settings as recommended by video and resolution 2560x1440. My hw build now matches the signature.

I don't have a VR set yet and I don't plan to in 2023 either.

Great now the benchmark is complete, thank you. I bought a 4090 today, when I can fit the graphics into the case I can provide the data.

Hi, some of the most useful data I've seen so far, great job. It's just a shame that it's not on the same trk file as the previous tests.

Hi, can you please increase the AA value to 4x and add SSAA at least x1.5 to rerun the benchmark, thank you very much.

So the position of the shooter is fixed, a nice present under the tree, thank you.