Sweep

It isn't colored? ;) Yeah yeah, real one, whatever...Ours should be the same IF we ever get "other modes".

4vmany BVR against 4th gens. Edit: And not AIs. :D

Real men use these:

:megalol::megalol::megalol: :thumbup: 11/10

Over 9000:1 Actually, its more like 4.8:1 overall. (counting all three (or two??) stats rotations) If only I could add a nice 5.2 to that... :mad:

I'm not sure it works that way bud...

15 seconds for all the FC3 jammers AFAIK.

ITT:

Just some more F99th Eagle Porn...I take NO responsibility for these screenshots, all credits go to this guy.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiight...:music_whistling:

Daniel refresh the page! :lol:

The S in MiG-29S means Salt-truck, right? :lol: Seriously, though, why are you using IRST against a high aspect target at 10 nmi? You got what you deserved: Degraded SA and no shot.

AFAIK "instagc" isn't a bot. I've seen that name on other servers...

FB-22

+1

RIP... (I know "RIP" sounds so unoriginal, but I don't want to say much else for obvious reasons)

+1 to all of that.

F-15s wacking SA-6 radars is perfectly realistic. :P :thumbup:

Why not simply get rid of all SEAD weapons? Mavericks and 29Ts are more fun IMO :D

In-game the Slammer has a range basically ~1/4 or worse than what its known to have IRL. Usually something like a 6-7 mile effective range at 15-20k/transonic launch versus the same... The same goes for all BVR AAMs in-game. I believe its the way ED interprets the charts that gives us much much closer engagements than what'd probably happen IRL. (Something about the DLZ's max range indication implying Raero instead of Rpi, I think?) I hope this will change with future modules (see how Mirage's missiles work?).

^ :thumbup:

^That DL stuff doesn't really exist outside of the internet, though. Think of lag as defensive jamming...At least in radar engagements...:P

Can we get our Fighter/Attacker/Helo channels set up like the Red ones with some flight/group channels?

Will do...? I guess? :yawn: