amalahama

Plus we are still in summer vacation time

Cool thanks. Looking forward to your first DBS2 picture on an airbase :D

Hi I'm pretty amaze by the RBM mode showed recently in your Facebook page, thank you! Could you share some screens showing DBS mode as well? Regards

I'm afraid it's eyecandy only, it doesn't detect actual clouds. Regards

In general, I think the whole dumb ammunition delivery system needs to be revamped, to take into account the different ways to solve the triangulation problem during the ordinance delivery, in order to model properly the lack of accuracy when Target is not designated with the arbs. Heatblur did a masterpiece in the Viggen in that regards.

Well, diverting a bit from the discussion, something I'd REALLY like to see implemented is wind correction for AUTO and CCIP modes. Oh, and some sort of dithering/low res filter in the ARBS video, in RL it's an analogue camera similar to Maverick's, it cannot provide the same image quality as the TPOD. Same for HUD FLIR.

Nice summary! Personally I prefer GR.4, maybe early ones from the end 90s without brimstones and all the stuff, which may still be classified.

And it's realistic? During night missions it's specially annoying

Hi! Is it normal that when I switch on AP hold mode, the altitude warning lights up regardless how high I'm flying?

So I retested it tonight paying more attention and it works! yesterday I was flying over an area with many small islands and I probably mixed them up. However RB75s don't lock onto oil tankers, do they?

I auto-quote myself. It still shows the 9 as placeholder :(

I will check again more thoroughly this evening and come back to you. Thanks!

Unfortunately I doubt so, RAZBAM always misses these sort of details. I don't think wind drifting is taken into account in the bombing solution either.

It's not realistic, therefore it's highly likely that RAZBAM will implemented it down the road...

In the Ground Radar 2.0 feature description they stated it can now detect civilian traffic: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=225862 Make civilian traffic visible. Trains, static ships, parked aircraft etc. - will now be visible on the radar. Some of these objects are highly reflective owing to their large RCS and materials. Therefore it looks like a bug to me Regards

Hi, I just had a relaxing flight with the Viggen along UAE's shoreline and I noticed that oil tankers don't show up in the radar. I played with LOG/LIN, gain, pulse length with no avail. Being a big target with a large RCS in the middle of the sea, it should be easy to pick up

Do we have the minus sign in the ck-37 display now?

Thanks Cobra Don't forget sound department and the annoying loop effect

I don't know what you mean by 'clean' I tried yesterday and it worked flawlessly

I agree. If it comes like that, I wont buy it

There is absolutely no information on the third pylon, either...

ED quote or didn't happen

Now we are talking. Absolutely agree with your opinion now. Whatever it takes to make the Shark more realistic is an instant-buy to me. Regards

The number of rays used in the AG radar modeling is wayyyyyyyy less than the number you would need for an effective computation - you would need a dedicated monster-GPU 2080-like just for getting enough rays to work out a significative RCS value in real time for just one 3D object, and yet the behaviour of microwaves are fundamentally different to visible waves, specially at low frequencies. Bref: No, this technique is not useful for assessing RCS in a realistic way.

This topic is getting REALLY interesting with deep insights on the different Ka-50 variations throughout the years. Well done! No third pylon on the Ka-50 though :P