amalahama

I agree. If it comes like that, I wont buy it

There is absolutely no information on the third pylon, either...

ED quote or didn't happen

Now we are talking. Absolutely agree with your opinion now. Whatever it takes to make the Shark more realistic is an instant-buy to me. Regards

The number of rays used in the AG radar modeling is wayyyyyyyy less than the number you would need for an effective computation - you would need a dedicated monster-GPU 2080-like just for getting enough rays to work out a significative RCS value in real time for just one 3D object, and yet the behaviour of microwaves are fundamentally different to visible waves, specially at low frequencies. Bref: No, this technique is not useful for assessing RCS in a realistic way.

This topic is getting REALLY interesting with deep insights on the different Ka-50 variations throughout the years. Well done! No third pylon on the Ka-50 though :P

No I'm not

There won't be third pylon. Now get over it and move on

MWS - missile Warning system

Well known it's the Ka50Sh, it came in two flavors, with one and two eo turrets (made by Sagem IIRC). It was presented in MAKS some time ago. Then, it seems a variant of the Shkval with the same sensor from Mercure (LLTV) was installed in one of the prototypes, but I haven't been able to either find a picture or more relevant info.

Apache is one noteworthy omission among all third parties. I'm quite sure ED reserved it for themselves. I cant wait to revisit the janes longbow spirit in DCS!! Regards

Hey very good news RagnarDa! It was one of the long standing (and annoying) bugs in the avionics. Are you guys going to have a look to the high-speed, high level performances as well?

Somebody commented Shkval-N with an IR sensor existed in RL and was fitted in some Ka-50 prototypes. Is it true? Not the Ka-50Sh abomination with the suplementary EO/IR turret, but a complete upgrade of the Shkval system

Hi, Will long time forgotten misses, like the electrical system (ultra-simplified in the current v2) and the Shkval filters be implemented? I'm actually more interested on a well-polished Ka-50 existing version rather than new exotic systems only installed in prototypes and not very realistic from the operational point of view. Regards

For some reason my post about the BLU-107 has been closed but yeah, absolutely in for Durandals - maybe not operational today but I doubt the capability has been removed from 2007's Blk50 OFC. Regards

BLU-107 anti-runway bomb? Hi, Apparently F-16 was certified to carry this store http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9622 It might not have been used profusely in operation, but the peculiar drop profile makes it a very exciting tool for our virtual missions. Thoughts?

Don't hold your breath...

Yes, fingers crossed

Man, no JASSM is disappointing, I was really looking forward to it. I noticed no GBU-32, either.

Hi. Isn't there any Man-in-the-loop weapon integrated in the USAF's F-16Cs?

Cool, 2021 we might have the viggen exciting EA and RAT fully functional

https://www.dropbox.com/s/oya6o79zz0kfv9e/D.Utah_1_16-cr-00034-DAK-BCW_1_0.pdf?dl=0&fbclid=IwAR3nfB2Q2vAgTbtHehaxZT2OGyiJCt07TaEnTEnbTDHfm1qFbmFmdEPMVK8 Regards

This And this are the two worst bugs in the Viggen ATM Regards

That's the way RAZBAM fixes bugs - moving them to the 'solved' section

FLIR projection on the HUD could be a tad more realistic (hard borders). Also Maverick and ARBS image resolution are irrealistically sharp, especially taking into account that both produce analog video feed