-
Posts
581 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Swordsman422
-
Oh, the VF-2 beachball... talk about a loud helmet. null
-
In other aircraft like the F/A-18 or F-14, I try to release against a moving target from the head-on quarter. Since the bomb will be in lag pursuit anyway, it's far more likely to hit.
-
Not all at once. You could have broken these down by CVW and dates as well. Also, these carriers weren't always with the same fleet. Sometimes they shifted between Atlantic and Pacific fleets, though that's telling here with Atlantic and Pacific squadrons seeing time aboard.
-
Thanks! VFA-34 is my favorite legacy hornet squadron.
-
So you don't get VFA34_JOKER_CVW-17_USS_George_Washington_2002 when you download it?
-
The link on the downloads page is incorrect.
-
I solved mine. I had some back seat switchology issues that I didn't even consider. Maybe keep this topic open for anyone having trouble with the TPOD to discuss.
-
Yes. I never move it off of TGT. I do have CDES boxed as well. I don't know if this is relevant, and it shouldn't be, but I am targeting static ground vehicles instead of live ones. This is a ground attack training range custom mission that I have made.
-
Hey guys, I've been trying to learn the use of the TPOD and LGBs, and am having a rather frustrating time. I have watched both the Grim Reapers and Spudknocker tutorial videos multiple times and I cannot figure out what I'm doing wrong. I am in A/G Master Mode, my PACS for the GBUs are set, master arm is on, laser is armed, weapons selected. When I use TDC press to designate a target, the target cursor goes off PTRK/ATRK and into snowplow so that I have to move the cursor back over the target and use auto acquisition press to box PTRK/ATRK again. I get the bomb azimuth line, but it is off center and does not line up with the target. I never get TREL and TTGT is always 00:00. Any hints? Thanks.
-
Now we can all sit back and play the second movement of "March to Glory" on repeat like it's 1999 all over again.
-
Caught the new DCS profile photo on the FB page like 5 minutes after it was updated and decided to pop onto the website. Decked out in SE, so I ran the updater and sure enough, she's ready to be put in the stable.
-
Naval F-4 Phantom | Livery Request Thread
Swordsman422 replied to Zaakuro's topic in DCS: F-4E Phantom
A very special hell? The one they reserve for child molesters and people who talk at the theater? (referencing Firefly for anyone not aware...) Yeah... Navy liveries look really janky on long-nose phantoms. Back to the topic at hand, VF-143's unusual red F-4J liveries are some I'd like to see. -
Why is a cable stretched between the bolts?
Swordsman422 replied to ASW's topic in Bugs and Problems
Part of the Heatblur Forge. You'll see a variety of minor cockpit modifications randomly applied to your plane. In this case, your aircraft's ACM panel has buttons that habitually come loose during cat shots, and the safety wire is an attempt to prevent that from occurring. -
F14 Skinners thread (Paintkit in 1st post)
Swordsman422 replied to David A Sell's topic in DCS: F-14A & B
Awesome. That's my favorite VF-154 livery, the TPS with just the two grey stripes on the tail. Those birds worked hard for a living. -
People are talking about removing the glove pylons, but I'd like the ability to define what pylon is attached to 1B and 8B if they are empty. You didn't often see those pylons downloaded if they weren't being used.
-
Bear in mind that it's not universally true for US aircraft. The F-14 being a prime example (original F-14B prototype, F-14A+ production aircraft assuming the F-14B label later on, etc). The waters get muddier the further back you go, especially in USN inventories (looking at you, F-4 Phantom and F-8 Crusader).
-
Please note I'm not coming down on either side of the issue. Since someone asked, here is the Wikipedia list of US air-to-air combat victories since post-Vietnam. I'm searching for a list of F-15 kills in other services that include the weapon used, but am so far coming up empty. Still, here is as good a place to start as any. USAF F-15Cs have accounted for 36 of the F-15's 102 air combat victories. Notable that USAF F-15s have 10 kills with the AiM-9, 23 with the AiM-7, and 3 with the AiM-120. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_combat_victories_of_United_States_military_aircraft_since_the_Vietnam_War
-
No. That's the livery that VF-84 was wearing at the time of filming. Unlike Top Gun, there were no special fictional paint schemes for Final Countdown.
-
Does the DCS 2023 & Beyond trailer hint at a F-14D?
Swordsman422 replied to JupiterJoe's topic in DCS: F-14A & B
Ah, that's the A I missed. The one with the VF-103 F-14B livery. Definitely not a D. -
Does the DCS 2023 & Beyond trailer hint at a F-14D?
Swordsman422 replied to JupiterJoe's topic in DCS: F-14A & B
A lot of the systems that were maintenance-heavy remained on the D. The wiring, hydraulics, and wing sweep mechanisms were some of the big time items, and those didn't go away when the D was introduced. About a third of the Ds built were actually rebuilds of As. They were still hogs, just hogs with more digital data busses and MFDs in place of CRT screens. -
Does the DCS 2023 & Beyond trailer hint at a F-14D?
Swordsman422 replied to JupiterJoe's topic in DCS: F-14A & B
The only new Grumman product I noticed in the trailer was an F6F Hellcat. The F-14s I saw were all Bs. -
Just tested this and can confirm. They must have done it quietly. I never saw them add it for SC users in the changelog.
-
Bugs & issues
Swordsman422 replied to Sandman Simulations's topic in DCS: F-14B Operation Sandworm Campaign
I'm glad that we have a full squadron of VF-24 represented, but one nitpick is that in the US Navy after 1980, the numbers 8 and 9 were not used in carrier-based fixed-wing aircraft, so there would not be a 208 or 209 in 1998. It would be more appropriate for these aircraft to be 214 and 215. -
Is a net device available on the carrier?
Swordsman422 replied to scommander2's topic in DCS: F-14A & B
This belongs in the Supercarrier forum, as it is a feature pertinent to that module and not the F-14. If this had been about the Forrestal, it'd be a different story. Anyway, no, the barricade and barricade recoveries have not yet been implemented for the SC module. -
The F-14B was called the F-14B before the advent of LANTIRN and PTID. The F-14A+ production ended in 1990 and it was redesignated F-14B on 1 May, 1991. The first LANTIRN upgrades were made in testing in March of 1995. So there were NEVER new F-14Bs delivered with the PTID. As with the F-14A, they were upgraded with it as they received LANTIRN capability.
