MrDieing

Say no more my friend, say no more...

In the form of only half the buttons clickable and a PFM for the front half of the aircraft? ;) I do agree with you though and I hope that if one day they have to make this decision for what ever reason, they find this middle ground. And by the way, only two more weeks for the P-47 boys, I can feel it. :joystick:

The French are just as secret about the M2K-5 as they are about the M2K-D, same goes for M2K-N, Rafale, hell they are even secret about that vacuum cleaner of an Alpha Jet..

Always those bloody Brits nagging about 'their' Harrier.. Will we get GR7/GR9? Will we have RAF/RN skins? Will we have HMS Ark Royal? Yeah yeah, we get it, you invented the bloody thing and America stole it :D

If ED one day decides to pull stuff like throwing FC3-level planes all over the place, that would be suicide, and they know that. The standard they set to themselves and the other 3rd Parties is what sets them apart from current and future competitors.

What the hell does it actually matter? You are digging up something old and outdated and try to connect it to the present without knowing what happend in between. Answers were given above, stop trying to make it all look like some evil weird ass conspiracy.

Always difficult, those higher powers.. :doh:

Really? And what logic did you use to determine this? I seem to be unable to retrieve any sense of time from this message.

Perhaps this too is dependent on what modification we are getting, lets say the Russian one has 750 and perhaps the Azerbaijanis modified theirs to spare some weight and carry less ammo.

Not anymore, VEAO has cancelled all projects for DCS except the P-40F. Also, they were able to get this information because they had been contracted by the British DoD, to create a full fidelity simulator for them. They were given permission to create a commercial version without the strictly classified stuff. Good luck trying that from French DoD..

There is a certain level of reality that ED requires from themselves and 3rd parties in order to make a module. Even though there might be some docs on the M2K-5, its probably nowhere near enough to create a 'realistic' module. Combining this with the fact that the French are extremely reluctant to share about their techologies, we yet again come to the point, as stated several times before in this thread, that its not possible and that its not going to happen. Period.

Unfortunately yes, but patience is a good thing I suppose. Lovely signature picture by the way, I was at Araxos back in 2014 when the HAF said goodbye to the mighty Corsair. Also, when more information becomes available in due time, I will update the main post with it to have a overview of what we know etc.

Damn, this looks better than both my sticks..

This and regardless of what everyone thinks still should be added/improved, they look hella better then what we have now, so I suggest a little less of the saying “Bachelors’ wives and maidens’ children are well taught.” and a little more enjoying and thank saying for all the effort the devs took to bring this good stuff to us :thumbup:

Some people's logic in this thread is quite hilarious. Its ready when its ready, maybe next week, maybe next month, maybe next year.

No

Anyone up for a little bet? I'm putting my money on 2028 for this module.

They are doing the A-7E, which is the USN variant.

I see, and yes, sadly that is somewhat of a truth these days.

Looks like I offended a Frenchman. Calm down, it was just a joke.

That is probably because they are scared to show their partners that their missile is not very good compared to the American and other European missiles :D

Kind of a weird way of announing that its now on the Live version too, by just putting it between the patch notes and no further remarks to it. Oh well..

The left bar represents the Radar Angle while the right bar represents the angle of the TV/IR/EC.

I remember an other thread where 'place' in DCS was quite heavily discussed and I don't mean to open this discussion again, all I am going to say is that although I understand your POV, I respectfully disagree with this and believe there is no 'place' in DCS. There is room for everything and everyone :)

Does anybody have an idea with what exactly they mean with DCS Su-33 in the changelog?