Jump to content

Nero.ger

Members
  • Posts

    838
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nero.ger

  1. last time i check if you try to make an Addon/Plugin similar to the ns430 and add it to an existing Plane, DCS throws this error Scripting: plugin: test_addon unit modification F-5E not allowed it works perfectly fine with a UserMade Plane (like CubanAces su57 for example) if there has been a change to that, that would be great news (and yes the test_addon was in the SavedGames folder as other Mods)
  2. if ED would not block usermade addons, we could do it ourselfs.....
  3. hopefully this gets fixed befor we get GBU38s
  4. i had the following issue. Entered Coordinates and it changed the "Seconds", in my case from '20 to '19 anyone else encountered this issue?
  5. +1 and to copy it to the Windows-clipboard
  6. how awesome it would be to have in the L-39 ZA too
  7. and this is a real problem, and i hope someday companys will learn that
  8. only as a "pop-up"-magic
  9. as long as it looks like "the real deal", i am sure nobody minds that its a little hack under the hood :)
  10. Just remove the IC check that prevents us to build our own Addons for Airplanes. Then we can integrate the NS4 into other planes ourselfs and free up your devtime. side note: "NS 430 for the L-39 and Pop-up Window" you might add the "C" to "L-39" in the shop to avoid further confusion.
  11. +1 its puzzling that this is still in....
  12. best thing about this mod, it tunes down those stupid reflections on the glass
  13. you are describing a bug that was there a few version ago, is suggest runinng the DCS updater
  14. the Vikher is a beam rider (it looks for the laserbeam behind the missle instead for the laserspot at the target), so you and your wingmen would need to be in roughly the same spot to make this even remotly possible
  15. not that there was any doubt, just to confirm i tested it and its triggering IC problems
  16. this looks VERY interresting. Does it work in MP or does the Integrity Check freak out?
  17. and if it is too hard i am sure people from the community are more than happy to help the janitors.
  18. i am no expert or even amatuer on flight dynamics, so i stay WAY clear of THAT discussion ;)
  19. amatuer point of view: if it pitches up, it looses speed > slowly pitches down > gains speed > pitches up again. so you have to use trim (which is a bit crude, no idea if its that crude irl) and throttle to maintain a neutral pitch. and just accept small changes in pitch up down and correct them yourself. just be happy its not a warbird with prop-torc :)
  20. @rudel... you know trolling your customers is a very bad idea... people bought the module bevor all those anyoing additional effects like reflections where implemented and they voice thier concern and all you do is insult/laught at them for paying you money... maybe you dont understand that people actualy like play the game instead of treating it like a piece of art, only to be looked at, in the way his creator intended. i looked at the Steam page and the pictures shows the cockpit in a very favorible angles so you cant see those reflections and shit. So how about updating the pictures with the real deal you seem to be so proud of that you refuse to accknowladge an issue that many people have.
  21. ooooooooo its not a Mig21...so your point is? but i understand that at this point the the "conversation" its very hard to jump over ones own shadow and just make an alternativ livery for the cockpit, like for different languages. So the consumer has a choice.
  22. +1 thanks for the work of everyone involved much more fun flying the F18 now!
  23. nothing is stopping a server from using a Mod plane
×
×
  • Create New...